Search Results

There are 99801 results for: content related to: Understanding and Avoiding the Adverse Psychological Effects of Screening: A Commentary

  1. You have free access to this content
    Informing on prenatal screening for Down syndrome prior to conception. An empirical and ethical perspective

    American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A

    Volume 158A, Issue 3, March 2012, Pages: 485–497, Marleen Schoonen, Boukje van der Zee, Hajo Wildschut, Inez de Beaufort, Guido de Wert, Harry de Koning, Marie-Louise Essink-Bot and Eric Steegers

    Version of Record online : 2 FEB 2012, DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.35213

  2. You have free access to this content
    References

    Genetic Testing: Care, Consent, and Liability

    Neil F. Sharpe, Ronald F. Carter, Pages: 453–566, 2006

    Published Online : 4 JAN 2006, DOI: 10.1002/0471748897.refs

  3. Prenatal screening and diagnosis of congenital toxoplasmosis: a review of safety issues and psychological consequences for women who undergo screening

    Prenatal Diagnosis

    Volume 27, Issue 5, May 2007, Pages: 395–403, Babak Khoshnood, Catherine De Vigan, François Goffinet and Valériane Leroy

    Version of Record online : 22 MAR 2007, DOI: 10.1002/pd.1715

  4. Towards informed decisions about prenatal testing: A review

    Prenatal Diagnosis

    Volume 15, Issue 13, December 1995, Pages: 1215–1226, Theresa M. Marteau

    Version of Record online : 14 DEC 2005, DOI: 10.1002/pd.1970151304

  5. Uptake of a prenatal screening test: the role of healthcare professionals' attitudes towards the test

    Prenatal Diagnosis

    Volume 24, Issue 11, November 2004, Pages: 864–868, Elizabeth Dormandy and Theresa M. Marteau

    Version of Record online : 24 NOV 2004, DOI: 10.1002/pd.1028

  6. You have free access to this content
    Providing information about prenatal screening for Down syndrome: a systematic review

    Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

    Volume 94, Issue 2, February 2015, Pages: 125–132, Mette M. Skjøth, Eva Draborg, Claus D. Pedersen, Helle P. Hansen, Ronald F. Lamont and Jan S. Jørgensen

    Version of Record online : 11 DEC 2014, DOI: 10.1111/aogs.12543

  7. Facilitating informed choice in prenatal testing: How well are we doing?

    American Journal of Medical Genetics

    Volume 106, Issue 3, Autumn (Fall) 2001, Pages: 185–190, Theresa M. Marteau and Elizabeth Dormandy

    Version of Record online : 9 SEP 2001, DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.10006

  8. Decisional needs assessment regarding Down syndrome prenatal testing: a systematic review of the perceptions of women, their partners and health professionals

    Prenatal Diagnosis

    Volume 28, Issue 13, December 2008, Pages: 1183–1203, Sylvie St-Jacques, Sonya Grenier, Marc Charland, Jean-Claude Forest, François Rousseau and France Légaré

    Version of Record online : 18 DEC 2008, DOI: 10.1002/pd.2059

  9. The psychosocial impact of human papillomavirus testing in primary cervical screening—a study within a randomized trial

    International Journal of Gynecological Cancer

    Volume 18, Issue 4, July/August 2008, Pages: 743–748, H.C. KITCHENER, I. FLETCHER, C. ROBERTS, P. WHEELER, M. ALMONTE and P. MAGUIRE

    Version of Record online : 18 OCT 2007, DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2007.01113.x

  10. Population screening for cystic fibrosis: Knowledge and emotional consequences 18 months later

    American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A

    Volume 120A, Issue 2, 15 July 2003, Pages: 199–208, Claire Gordon, Ian Walpole, Stephen R. Zubrick and Carol Bower

    Version of Record online : 20 JUN 2003, DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.20259

  11. Does prenatal screening influence anxiety levels of pregnant women? A longitudinal randomised controlled trial

    Prenatal Diagnosis

    Volume 26, Issue 4, April 2006, Pages: 354–361, Johanna H. Kleinveld, Danielle R. M. Timmermans, Denhard J. de Smit, Herman J. Adér, Gerrit van der Wal and Leo P. ten Kate

    Version of Record online : 2 MAR 2006, DOI: 10.1002/pd.1419

  12. Use of videotapes for viewing at home to inform choice in Down syndrome screening: a randomised controlled trial

    Prenatal Diagnosis

    Volume 21, Issue 2, February 2001, Pages: 146–149, Jenny Hewison, Howard Cuckle, Catherine Baillie, Indera Sehmi, Steve Lindow, Fiona Jackson and Joy Batty

    Version of Record online : 27 FEB 2001, DOI: 10.1002/1097-0223(200102)21:2<146::AID-PD3>3.0.CO;2-M

  13. Considerations in using tumor markers: what the psycho-oncologist needs to know

    Psycho-Oncology

    Volume 10, Issue 5, September/October 2001, Pages: 370–379, Debra L. Fertig and Daniel F. Hayes

    Version of Record online : 28 AUG 2001, DOI: 10.1002/pon.514

  14. Women's preferences in screening for Down syndrome

    Prenatal Diagnosis

    Volume 26, Issue 9, September 2006, Pages: 837–841, Mark Deverill and Stephen Robson

    Version of Record online : 17 JUL 2006, DOI: 10.1002/pd.1517

  15. Women's opinions on the offer and use of nuchal translucency screening for Down syndrome

    Prenatal Diagnosis

    Volume 26, Issue 2, February 2006, Pages: 105–111, Moira A. Müller, Otto P. Bleker, Gouke J. Bonsel and Caterina M. Bilardo

    Version of Record online : 6 FEB 2006, DOI: 10.1002/pd.1344

  16. You have free access to this content
    Prenatal testing: towards realistic expectations of patients, providers and policy makers

    Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology

    Volume 19, Issue 1, January 2002, Pages: 5–6, T. M. Marteau

    Version of Record online : 12 DEC 2002, DOI: 10.1046/j.0960-7692.2001.00619.x

  17. Prenatal Screening for Down's Syndrome: Parent and Healthcare Practitioner Experiences

    Sociology Compass

    Volume 8, Issue 6, June 2014, Pages: 837–850, Gareth M. Thomas

    Version of Record online : 19 JUN 2014, DOI: 10.1111/soc4.12185

  18. Psychology and screening: Narrowing the gap between efficacy and effectiveness

    British Journal of Clinical Psychology

    Volume 33, Issue 1, February 1994, Pages: 1–10, Theresa M. Matteau

    Version of Record online : 12 JUL 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1994.tb01089.x

  19. Accepting or declining the offer of prenatal screening for congenital defects: test uptake and women's reasons

    Prenatal Diagnosis

    Volume 25, Issue 1, January 2005, Pages: 84–90, Matthijs van den Berg, Danielle R. M. Timmermans, Johanna H. Kleinveld, Elisa Garcia, John M. G. van Vugt and Gerrit van der Wal

    Version of Record online : 20 JAN 2005, DOI: 10.1002/pd.1090

  20. You have free access to this content
    Use of a decision aid for prenatal testing of fetal abnormalities to improve women’s informed decision making: a cluster randomised controlled trial [ISRCTN22532458]

    BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology

    Volume 115, Issue 3, February 2008, Pages: 339–347, C Nagle, J Gunn, R Bell, S Lewis, B Meiser, S Metcalfe, OC Ukoumunne and J Halliday

    Version of Record online : 8 JAN 2008, DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01576.x