Search Results

There are 56810 results for: content related to: Payments for Environmental Services: Conservation with Pro-Poor Benefits

  1. What should we call instruments commonly known as payments for environmental services? A review of the literature and a proposal

    Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

    Volume 1219, Issue 1, February 2011, Pages: 209–225, Barry G. Shelley

    Article first published online : 17 FEB 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05941.x

  2. Pro-poor payments for environmental services: Challenges for the government and administrative agencies in Vietnam

    Public Administration and Development

    Volume 28, Issue 5, December 2008, Pages: 363–373, Pham Thu Thuy, Hoang Minh Ha and Bruce M. Campbell

    Article first published online : 27 NOV 2008, DOI: 10.1002/pad.513

  3. Paying for environmental services: The case of Brazilian Amazonia

    Journal of International Development

    Volume 20, Issue 7, October 2008, Pages: 965–981, Anthony Hall

    Article first published online : 8 JUL 2008, DOI: 10.1002/jid.1456

  4. Market Masquerades: Uncovering the Politics of Community-level Payments for Environmental Services in Cambodia

    Development and Change

    Volume 43, Issue 1, January 2012, Pages: 133–158, Sarah Milne and Bill Adams

    Article first published online : 21 FEB 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2011.01748.x

  5. Evaluating Institutional Performance: Payments for Environmental Services in Costa Rica

    Latin American Policy

    Volume 3, Issue 2, December 2012, Pages: 195–207, Melissa Bollman and Scott D. Hardy

    Article first published online : 2 NOV 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.2041-7373.2012.00070.x

  6. Farmers’ Willingness to Participate in Payment-for-Environmental-Services Programmes

    Journal of Agricultural Economics

    Volume 63, Issue 3, September 2012, Pages: 604–626, Shan Ma, Scott M. Swinton, Frank Lupi and Christina Jolejole-Foreman

    Article first published online : 27 AUG 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-9552.2012.00358.x

  7. Unequal Access to Payments for Ecosystem Services: The Case of Costa Rica

    Development and Change

    Volume 45, Issue 6, November 2014, Pages: 1310–1331, David M. Lansing

    Article first published online : 23 OCT 2014, DOI: 10.1111/dech.12134

  8. You have full text access to this Open Access content
    When payments for environmental services will work for conservation

    Conservation Letters

    Volume 6, Issue 4, July/August 2013, Pages: 230–237, Sven Wunder

    Article first published online : 10 JUN 2013, DOI: 10.1111/conl.12034

  9. You have free access to this content
    The Contradictory Logic of Global Ecosystem Services Markets

    Development and Change

    Volume 43, Issue 1, January 2012, Pages: 105–131, Kathleen McAfee

    Article first published online : 21 FEB 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2011.01745.x

  10. Enduring footprint of historical land tenure on modern land cover in eastern Mexico: implications for environmental services programmes


    Volume 46, Issue 4, December 2014, Pages: 398–409, Alexandra G Ponette-González and Matthew Fry

    Article first published online : 20 OCT 2014, DOI: 10.1111/area.12125

  11. Payments for Ecosystem Services in Nicaragua: Do Market-based Approaches Work?

    Development and Change

    Volume 41, Issue 3, May 2010, Pages: 421–444, Gert Van Hecken and Johan Bastiaensen

    Article first published online : 25 JUN 2010, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2010.01644.x

  12. You have free access to this content
    The Future of Payments for Environmental Services

    Conservation Biology

    Volume 25, Issue 6, December 2011, Pages: 1134–1138, PAUL J. FERRARO

    Article first published online : 9 NOV 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01791.x

  13. Impact of a Community-Based Payment for Environmental Services Intervention on Forest Use in Menabe, Madagascar

    Conservation Biology

    Volume 24, Issue 6, December 2010, Pages: 1488–1498, MATTHEW SOMMERVILLE, E.J. MILNER-GULLAND, MICHAEL RAHAJAHARISON and JULIA P.G. JONES

    Article first published online : 11 NOV 2010, DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01526.x

  14. Why keep lions instead of livestock? Assessing wildlife tourism-based payment for ecosystem services involving herders in the Maasai Mara, Kenya

    Natural Resources Forum

    Volume 37, Issue 4, November 2013, Pages: 242–256, Philip M. Osano, Mohammed Y. Said, Jan de Leeuw, Nicholas Ndiwa, Dickson Kaelo, Sarah Schomers, Regina Birner and Joseph O. Ogutu

    Article first published online : 9 OCT 2013, DOI: 10.1111/1477-8947.12027

  15. Technologies Applicable to Specific Chemicals

    Wiley's Remediation Technologies Handbook: Major Contaminant Chemicals and Chemical Groups

    Jay H. Lehr, Pages: 11–319, 2005

    Published Online : 28 JAN 2005, DOI: 10.1002/0471655473.ch2

  16. A Spatially Explicit Estimate of Avoided Forest Loss

    Conservation Biology

    Volume 25, Issue 5, October 2011, Pages: 1032–1043, JORDI HONEY-ROSÉS, KATHY BAYLIS and M. ISABEL RAMÍREZ

    Article first published online : 8 SEP 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01729.x

  17. Economic instruments for nature conservation

    Key Topics in Conservation Biology 2

    Christopher B. Barrett, Erwin H. Bulte, Paul Ferraro, Sven Wunder, Pages: 59–73, 2013

    Published Online : 25 FEB 2013, DOI: 10.1002/9781118520178.ch4

  18. Market-Based Solutions to Reduce Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD)

    Environmental Alpha: Institutional Investors and Climate Change

    Stefanie Engel, Charles Palmer, Martin Berg, Pages: 213–244, 2011

    Published Online : 29 NOV 2011, DOI: 10.1002/9781118266748.ch10

  19. The Efficiency of Payments for Environmental Services in Tropical Conservation

    Conservation Biology

    Volume 21, Issue 1, February 2007, Pages: 48–58, SVEN WUNDER

    Article first published online : 3 OCT 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00559.x

  20. An assessment of adherence to basic ecological principles by payments for ecosystem service projects

    Conservation Biology

    Accepted manuscript online: 27 OCT 2015, C.M. Prager, A. Varga, P. Olmsted, J.C. Ingram, M. Cattau, C. Freund, R. Wynn-Grant and S. Naeem

    DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12648