Search Results

There are 9393 results for: content related to: A stochastic model for survival of early prostate cancer with adjustments for leadtime, length bias, and over-detection

  1. Quantification of length-bias in screening trials with covariate-dependent test sensitivity

    Biometrical Journal

    Volume 57, Issue 5, September 2015, Pages: 777–796, Sonya L. Heltshe, Karen Kafadar and Philip C. Prorok

    Version of Record online : 15 MAY 2015, DOI: 10.1002/bimj.201400152

  2. Effect of length biased sampling of unobserved sojourn times on the survival distribution when disease is screen detected

    Statistics in Medicine

    Volume 28, Issue 16, 20 July 2009, Pages: 2116–2146, Karen Kafadar and Philip C. Prorok

    Version of Record online : 7 MAY 2009, DOI: 10.1002/sim.3601

  3. Alternative definitions of comparable case groups and estimates of lead time and benefit time in randomized cancer screening trials

    Statistics in Medicine

    Volume 22, Issue 1, 15 January 2003, Pages: 83–111, Karen Kafadar and Philip C. Prorok

    Version of Record online : 11 DEC 2002, DOI: 10.1002/sim.1331

  4. Mortality Modeling of Early Detection Programs


    Volume 64, Issue 2, June 2008, Pages: 386–395, Sandra J. Lee and Marvin Zelen

    Version of Record online : 28 JUN 2008, DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00893.x

  5. Bayesian Inference for the Lead Time in Periodic Cancer Screening


    Volume 63, Issue 3, September 2007, Pages: 873–880, Dongfeng Wu, Gary L. Rosner and Lyle D. Broemeling

    Version of Record online : 23 JAN 2007, DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2006.00732.x

  6. Estimation of Sojourn Time in Chronic Disease Screening Without Data on Interval Cases


    Volume 56, Issue 1, March 2000, Pages: 167–172, Tony H. H. Chen, H. S. Kuo, M. F. Yen, M. S. Lai, L. Tabar and S. W. Duffy

    Version of Record online : 25 MAY 2004, DOI: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00167.x

  7. Evaluating the survival of cancer cases detected by screening

    Statistics in Medicine

    Volume 6, Issue 8, December 1987, Pages: 885–900, S. D. Walter and L. W. Stitt

    Version of Record online : 12 OCT 2006, DOI: 10.1002/sim.4780060804

  8. You have free access to this content
    Failure of researchers, reviewers, editors, and the media to understand flaws in cancer screening studies: Application to an article in Cancer


    Volume 120, Issue 18, September 15, 2014, Pages: 2784–2791, Donald A. Berry

    Version of Record online : 12 JUN 2014, DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28795

  9. Computational methods in medical decision making: to screen or not to screen?

    Statistics in Medicine

    Volume 24, Issue 4, 28 February 2005, Pages: 569–581, Karen Kafadar and Philip C. Prorok

    Version of Record online : 28 JAN 2005, DOI: 10.1002/sim.2037

  10. Assessing the effectiveness of a mammography screening service

    ANZ Journal of Surgery

    Volume 75, Issue 8, August 2005, Pages: 631–636, Cassandra Clayforth, Lin Fritschi, Suzanne McEvoy, Michael J. Byrne, Elizabeth Wylie, Tim Threlfall, Greg Sterrett, Jennet M. Harvey and Konrad Jamrozik

    Version of Record online : 3 AUG 2005, DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2005.03476.x

  11. An analysis of survival differences between clinically and screen-detected cancer patients

    Statistics in Medicine

    Volume 2, Issue 2, April/June 1983, Pages: 279–285, J. D. F. Habbema, G. J. Van Oortmarssen and D. J. Van Putten

    Version of Record online : 12 OCT 2006, DOI: 10.1002/sim.4780020224

  12. Estimation and Prediction for Cancer Screening Models Using Deconvolution and Smoothing


    Volume 57, Issue 2, June 2001, Pages: 389–395, Paul F. Pinsky

    Version of Record online : 21 MAY 2004, DOI: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2001.00389.x

  13. Screening, Overview

    Standard Article

    Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online

    Gerrit J. Oortmarssen

    Published Online : 29 SEP 2014, DOI: 10.1002/9781118445112.stat05257

  14. MLE and Bayesian Inference of Age-Dependent Sensitivity and Transition Probability in Periodic Screening


    Volume 61, Issue 4, December 2005, Pages: 1056–1063, Dongfeng Wu, Gary L. Rosner and Lyle Broemeling

    Version of Record online : 12 MAY 2005, DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00361.x

  15. Estimation of sojourn time distributions and false negative rates in screening programmes which use two modalities

    Statistics in Medicine

    Volume 8, Issue 6, June 1989, Pages: 743–755, Freda E. Alexander

    Version of Record online : 12 OCT 2006, DOI: 10.1002/sim.4780080611

  16. Lead-time and overdiagnosis estimation in neuroblastoma screening

    Statistics in Medicine

    Volume 22, Issue 18, 30 September 2003, Pages: 2877–2892, Claudia Spix, Jörg Michaelis, Frank Berthold, Rudolf Erttmann, Johannes Sander and Freimut H. Schilling

    Version of Record online : 27 AUG 2003, DOI: 10.1002/sim.1533

  17. A population model of prostate cancer incidence

    Statistics in Medicine

    Volume 25, Issue 16, 30 August 2006, Pages: 2846–2866, A. Tsodikov, A. Szabo and J. Wegelin

    Version of Record online : 5 JAN 2006, DOI: 10.1002/sim.2257

  18. Screening, Overview

    Standard Article

    Encyclopedia of Biostatistics

    Gerrit J. Oortmarssen

    Published Online : 15 JUL 2005, DOI: 10.1002/0470011815.b2a04047

  19. You have full text access to this Open Access content
    Cost-effective mammography screening in Korea: High incidence of breast cancer in young women

    Cancer Science

    Volume 100, Issue 6, June 2009, Pages: 1105–1111, Soon Young Lee, Seong Hwa Jeong, Youn Nam Kim, Jinheum Kim, Dae Ryong Kang, Hyeon-Chang Kim and Chung Mo Nam

    Version of Record online : 2 MAR 2009, DOI: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2009.01147.x

    Corrected by:


    Vol. 102, Issue 9, 1748, Version of Record online: 18 AUG 2011

  20. You have free access to this content
    Survival for clinical stage I lung cancer not surgically treated. Comparison between screen-detected and symptom-detected cases


    Volume 69, Issue 3, 1 February 1992, Pages: 685–692, Tomotaka Sobue, Takaichiro Suzuki, Minoru Matsuda, Tetsuo Kuroishi, Shigeto Ikeda, Tsuguo Naruke and The Japanese Lung Cancer Screening Research Group

    Version of Record online : 28 JUN 2006, DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19920201)69:3<685::AID-CNCR2820690315>3.0.CO;2-W