Search Results

There are 9257 results for: content related to: Adjudicative competence and comprehension of Miranda rights in adolescent defendants: a comparison of legal standards

  1. Ten Year Research Update (2001–2010): Evaluations for Competence to Stand Trial (Adjudicative Competence)

    Behavioral Sciences & the Law

    Volume 31, Issue 2, March/April 2013, Pages: 165–191, Michael H. Fogel, Wendy Schiffman, Denise Mumley, Chad Tillbrook and Thomas Grisso

    Article first published online : 24 JAN 2013, DOI: 10.1002/bsl.2051

  2. Five year research update (1996–2000): evaluations for competence to stand trial (adjudicative competence)

    Behavioral Sciences & the Law

    Volume 21, Issue 3, May/June 2003, Pages: 329–350, Denise L. Mumley, Chad E. Tillbrook and Thomas Grisso

    Article first published online : 8 JUN 2003, DOI: 10.1002/bsl.534

  3. The MacArthur adjudicative competence study: diagnosis, psychopathology, and competence-related abilities

    Behavioral Sciences & the Law

    Volume 15, Issue 3, Summer 1997, Pages: 329–345, Steven K. Hoge, Norman Poythress, Richard J. Bonnie, John Monahan, Marlene Eisenberg and Thomas Feucht-Haviar

    Article first published online : 4 DEC 1998, DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0798(199722/06)15:3<329::AID-BSL276>3.0.CO;2-Z

  4. Feigning in adjudicative competence evaluations

    Behavioral Sciences & the Law

    Volume 28, Issue 5, September/October 2010, Pages: 614–629, Sherif Soliman and Phillip J. Resnick

    Article first published online : 4 AUG 2010, DOI: 10.1002/bsl.950

  5. A Community-Based Model for Remediating Juveniles Adjudicated Incompetent to Stand Trial: Feedback from Youth, Attorneys, and Judges

    Juvenile and Family Court Journal

    Volume 65, Issue 2, Spring 2014, Pages: 23–38, Shelly L. Jackson, Janet I. Warren and Jessica Jones Coburn

    Article first published online : 6 JUN 2014, DOI: 10.1111/jfcj.12017

  6. Defense attorneys' concerns about the competence of adolescent defendants

    Behavioral Sciences & the Law

    Volume 28, Issue 5, September/October 2010, Pages: 630–646, Jodi L. Viljoen, Kaitlyn McLachlan, Twila Wingrove and Erika Penner

    Article first published online : 25 AUG 2010, DOI: 10.1002/bsl.954

  7. The development of decision-making capacities in children and adolescents: Psychological and neurological perspectives and their implications for juvenile defendants

    Behavioral Sciences & the Law

    Volume 27, Issue 2, March/April 2009, Pages: 173–190, Praveen Kambam and Christopher Thompson

    Article first published online : 5 MAR 2009, DOI: 10.1002/bsl.859

  8. Effectiveness of participation as a defendant: the attorney–juvenile client relationship

    Behavioral Sciences & the Law

    Volume 21, Issue 2, March/April 2003, Pages: 175–198, Melinda G. Schmidt, N. Dickon Reppucci and Jennifer L. Woolard

    Article first published online : 7 MAR 2003, DOI: 10.1002/bsl.532

  9. Pre-adjudicative and adjudicative competence in juveniles and young adults

    Behavioral Sciences & the Law

    Volume 21, Issue 3, May/June 2003, Pages: 393–410, Allison D. Redlich, Melissa Silverman and Hans Steiner

    Article first published online : 8 JUN 2003, DOI: 10.1002/bsl.543

  10. Juvenile Courts and Competency to Stand Trial

    Sociology Compass

    Volume 5, Issue 6, June 2011, Pages: 439–451, Angela Harvey

    Article first published online : 25 MAY 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-9020.2011.00377.x

  11. A closer look at juvenile adjudicative competence: What is fundamentally fair?

    The Brown University Child and Adolescent Behavior Letter

    Volume 31, Issue 2, February 2015, Pages: 1–6, Kathleen Kemp and Jamison Rogers

    Article first published online : 23 JAN 2015, DOI: 10.1002/cbl.30015

  12. Juvenile Competency and Responsibility: Public Perceptions

    Journal of Applied Social Psychology

    Volume 42, Issue 10, October 2012, Pages: 2411–2432, April R. Bradley, Roni Mayzer, Mallory Schefter, Erin Olufs, Joseph Miller and Mariah Laver

    Article first published online : 5 OCT 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00947.x

  13. Empathy or objectivity: The forensic examiner's dilemma?

    Behavioral Sciences & the Law

    Volume 28, Issue 5, September/October 2010, Pages: 585–602, Daniel W. Shuman and John A. Zervopoulos

    Article first published online : 6 SEP 2010, DOI: 10.1002/bsl.953

  14. Opinion formation in evaluating the adjudicative competence and restorability of criminal defendants: a review of 8,000 evaluations

    Behavioral Sciences & the Law

    Volume 24, Issue 2, March 2006, Pages: 113–132, Janet I. Warren, Daniel C. Murrie, William Stejskal, Lori H. Colwell, James Morris, Preeti Chauhan and Park Dietz

    Article first published online : 24 MAR 2006, DOI: 10.1002/bsl.699

  15. A PROCESS VALUE ANALYSIS OF DECISION-MAKER BIAS: THE CASE OF ECONOMIC CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

    American Business Law Journal

    Volume 32, Issue 4, February 1996, Pages: 481–540, JOHN R. ALLISON

    Article first published online : 28 JUN 2008, DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1714.1995.tb01537.x

  16. Real Interrogation: What Actually Happens When Cops Question Kids

    Law & Society Review

    Volume 47, Issue 1, March 2013, Pages: 1–36, Barry C. Feld

    Article first published online : 21 FEB 2013, DOI: 10.1111/lasr.12000

  17. The “Production” of Corruption in China's Courts: Judicial Politics and Decision Making in a One-Party State

    Law & Social Inquiry

    Volume 37, Issue 4, Fall 2012, Pages: 848–877, Ling Li

    Article first published online : 27 FEB 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-4469.2012.01285.x

  18. The importance of integrated care and collaborative consultation for advancing early childhood mental health: Lessons learned from professional colleagues

    The Brown University Child and Adolescent Behavior Letter

    Volume 31, Issue 2, February 2015, Pages: 1–7, Christine M. Low

    Article first published online : 23 JAN 2015, DOI: 10.1002/cbl.30016

  19. Developmental Incompetence to Stand Trial in Juvenile Courts

    Journal of Forensic Sciences

    Volume 57, Issue 4, July 2012, Pages: 989–996, Philip C. O’Donnell and Bruce Gross

    Article first published online : 2 MAR 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2012.02093.x

  20. Issues and considerations regarding the use of assessment instruments in the evaluation of competency to stand trial

    Behavioral Sciences & the Law

    Volume 21, Issue 3, May/June 2003, Pages: 351–367, Patricia A. Zapf and Jodi L. Viljoen

    Article first published online : 8 JUN 2003, DOI: 10.1002/bsl.535