Search Results

There are 20301 results for: content related to: The effects of neuroimaging and brain injury on insanity defenses

  1. Constructing insanity: jurors' prototypes, attitudes, and legal decision-making

    Behavioral Sciences & the Law

    Volume 25, Issue 4, July/August 2007, Pages: 449–470, Jennifer Eno Louden and Jennifer L Skeem

    Article first published online : 15 MAY 2007, DOI: 10.1002/bsl.760

  2. The Impact of the Guilty but Mentally III Verdict on Juror Decisions: An Empirical Analysis

    Journal of Applied Social Psychology

    Volume 16, Issue 8, November 1986, Pages: 686–701, Jeffrey C. Savitsky and William D. Lindblom

    Article first published online : 31 JUL 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1986.tb01753.x

  3. The Insanity Defense Reform Act of 1984: Much ado about nothing

    Behavioral Sciences & the Law

    Volume 7, Issue 3, Summer 1989, Pages: 403–419, Dr. Norman J. Finkel

    Article first published online : 13 FEB 2006, DOI: 10.1002/bsl.2370070309

  4. Emotional evidence and jurors' judgments: the promise of neuroscience for informing psychology and law

    Behavioral Sciences & the Law

    Volume 27, Issue 2, March/April 2009, Pages: 273–296, Jessica M. Salerno and Bette L. Bottoms

    Article first published online : 24 MAR 2009, DOI: 10.1002/bsl.861

  5. Jury decision making research: Are researchers focusing on the mouse and not the elephant in the room?

    Behavioral Sciences & the Law

    Volume 29, Issue 3, May/June 2011, Pages: 439–451, Narina Nuñez, Sean M. McCrea and Scott E. Culhane

    Article first published online : 23 FEB 2011, DOI: 10.1002/bsl.967

  6. Mock Juror Attribution of Criminal Responsibility: Effects of Race and the Guilty But Mentally III (GBMI) Verdict Option

    Journal of Applied Social Psychology

    Volume 20, Issue 19, November 1990, Pages: 1596–1611, Ronald L. Poulson

    Article first published online : 31 JUL 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1990.tb01495.x

  7. The Effect of Acknowledging Mock Jurors' Feelings on Affective and Cognitive Biases: It Depends on the Sample

    Behavioral Sciences & the Law

    Volume 29, Issue 3, May/June 2011, Pages: 331–357, John G. McCabe and Daniel A. Krauss

    Article first published online : 15 JUL 2011, DOI: 10.1002/bsl.990

  8. Jurors' perceptions of juvenile defendants: the influence of intellectual disability, abuse history, and confession evidence

    Behavioral Sciences & the Law

    Volume 27, Issue 3, May/June 2009, Pages: 401–430, Cynthia J. Najdowski, Bette L. Bottoms and Maria C. Vargas

    Article first published online : 23 APR 2009, DOI: 10.1002/bsl.873

  9. The effects of defendant race, victim race, and juror gender on evidence processing in a murder trial

    Behavioral Sciences & the Law

    Volume 24, Issue 2, March 2006, Pages: 179–198, Robert ForsterLee, Lynne ForsterLee, Irwin A. Horowitz and Ellen King

    Article first published online : 24 MAR 2006, DOI: 10.1002/bsl.675

  10. Social science involvement in voir dire: Preliminary data on the effectiveness of “scientific jury selection”

    Behavioral Sciences & the Law

    Volume 2, Issue 4, Autumn (Fall) 1984, Pages: 375–394, Dr. Jeffrey T. Frederick

    Article first published online : 13 FEB 2006, DOI: 10.1002/bsl.2370020405

  11. Effects of false-evidence ploys and expert testimony on jurors' verdicts, recommended sentences, and perceptions of confession evidence

    Behavioral Sciences & the Law

    Volume 27, Issue 3, May/June 2009, Pages: 333–360, William Douglas Woody and Krista D. Forrest

    Article first published online : 29 APR 2009, DOI: 10.1002/bsl.865

  12. Predictors of verdict and punitive damages in high-stakes civil litigation

    Behavioral Sciences & the Law

    Volume 26, Issue 2, March/April 2008, Pages: 167–186, Katherine V. Vinson, Mark A. Costanzo and Dale E. Berger, Ph.D.

    Article first published online : 14 MAR 2008, DOI: 10.1002/bsl.807

  13. Reducing racial bias in the penalty phase of capital trials

    Behavioral Sciences & the Law

    Volume 26, Issue 5, September/October 2008, Pages: 603–617, Netta Shaked-Schroer, Mark Costanzo and Amy Marcus-Newhall

    Article first published online : 11 SEP 2008, DOI: 10.1002/bsl.829

  14. The mental illness defense in the capital penalty hearing

    Behavioral Sciences & the Law

    Volume 5, Issue 4, Autumn (Fall) 1987, Pages: 411–421, Dr. Lawrence T. White

    Article first published online : 21 APR 2006, DOI: 10.1002/bsl.2370050405

  15. The verdict on jury trials for juveniles: the effects of defendant's age on trial outcomes

    Behavioral Sciences & the Law

    Volume 21, Issue 1, January/February 2003, Pages: 63–82, Diane Warling and Michele Peterson-Badali

    Article first published online : 8 JAN 2003, DOI: 10.1002/bsl.517

  16. Admitting evidence of a defendant's previous conviction (PCE) and its impact on juror deliberation in relation to both juror-processing style and juror concerns over the fairness of introducing PCE

    Legal and Criminological Psychology

    Volume 17, Issue 2, September 2012, Pages: 360–379, T. M. Honess and G. A. Mathews

    Article first published online : 6 JUN 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8333.2011.02019.x

  17. Stranger at the Gate: The Effect of the Plaintiff's use of an Interpreter on Juror Decision-Making

    Behavioral Sciences & the Law

    Volume 29, Issue 4, July/August 2011, Pages: 499–512, Daniel W. Shuman, Lynne Stokes and George Martinez

    Article first published online : 25 MAY 2011, DOI: 10.1002/bsl.985

  18. Mock Jury Research: Where Do We Go from Here?

    Behavioral Sciences & the Law

    Volume 29, Issue 3, May/June 2011, Pages: 467–479, Richard L. Wiener, Daniel A. Krauss and Joel D. Lieberman

    Article first published online : 27 JUN 2011, DOI: 10.1002/bsl.989

  19. Information Integration Theory, Juror Bias, and Sentence Recommendations Captured Over Time in a Capital Trial

    Applied Cognitive Psychology

    Volume 29, Issue 5, September/October 2015, Pages: 713–722, Victoria C. Estrada-Reynolds, Jennifer M. Gray and Narina Nuñez

    Article first published online : 24 JUL 2015, DOI: 10.1002/acp.3155

  20. Arbitrariness and the death penalty: how the defendant's appearance during trial influences capital jurors' punishment decision

    Behavioral Sciences & the Law

    Volume 24, Issue 2, March 2006, Pages: 215–234, Michael E. Antonio

    Article first published online : 24 MAR 2006, DOI: 10.1002/bsl.673