Search Results

There are 123828 results for: content related to: Predictors of verdict and punitive damages in high-stakes civil litigation

VIEW

  1. 1 - 20
  2. 21 - 40
  3. 41 - 60
  4. 61 - 80
  5. Next >
  1. Judge-Jury Difference in Punitive Damages Awards: Who Listens to the Supreme Court?

    Journal of Empirical Legal Studies

    Volume 8, Issue 2, June 2011, Pages: 325–357, Theodore Eisenberg and Michael Heise

    Article first published online : 12 MAY 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2011.01211.x

  2. To Dollars from Sense: Qualitative to Quantitative Translation in Jury Damage Awards

    Journal of Empirical Legal Studies

    Volume 8, Issue s1, December 2011, Pages: 120–147, Valerie P. Hans and Valerie F. Reyna

    Article first published online : 22 NOV 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2011.01233.x

  3. Jurors' Use of Standards of Proof in Decisions about Punitive Damages

    Behavioral Sciences & the Law

    Volume 30, Issue 6, November/December 2012, Pages: 856–872, William Douglas Woody and Edie Greene

    Article first published online : 24 JUL 2012, DOI: 10.1002/bsl.2027

  4. MCBRIDE V. GENERAL MOTORS: JUDICIAL RESPONSE TO CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGES IN A PRODUCTS LIABILITY PUNITIVE DAMAGE LIMITATION STATUTE

    American Business Law Journal

    Volume 29, Issue 3, September 1991, Pages: 367–411, WILLIAM H. VOLZ and MICHAEL C. FAYZ

    Article first published online : 22 AUG 2007, DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1714.1991.tb00639.x

  5. You have free access to this content
    THE DETERMINANTS OF STATE-LEVEL CAPS ON PUNITIVE DAMAGES: THEORY AND EVIDENCE

    Contemporary Economic Policy

    Volume 31, Issue 1, January 2013, Pages: 110–125, THOMAS J. MICELI and MICHAEL P. STONE

    Article first published online : 13 DEC 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1465-7287.2011.00297.x

  6. The Tort Remedy in Search and Seizure Cases: A Case Study in Juror Decision Making

    Law & Social Inquiry

    Volume 13, Issue 2, April 1988, Pages: 279–303, Jonathan D. Casper, Kennette Benedict and Jo L. Perry

    Article first published online : 17 NOV 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-4469.1988.tb01118.x

  7. Damage Anchors on Real Juries

    Journal of Empirical Legal Studies

    Volume 8, Issue s1, December 2011, Pages: 148–178, Shari Seidman Diamond, Mary R. Rose, Beth Murphy and John Meixner

    Article first published online : 22 NOV 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2011.01232.x

  8. Juries, Judges, and Punitive Damages: Empirical Analyses Using the Civil Justice Survey of State Courts 1992, 1996, and 2001 Data

    Journal of Empirical Legal Studies

    Volume 3, Issue 2, July 2006, Pages: 263–295, Theodore Eisenberg, Paula L. Hannaford-Agor, Michael Heise, Neil LaFountain, G. Thomas Munsterman, Brian Ostrom and Martin T. Wells

    Article first published online : 21 JUN 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2006.00070.x

  9. LEARNING ABOUT THE UNPREDICTABILITY OF LITIGATION THROUGH A MOCK JURY EXERCISE

    Journal of Legal Studies Education

    Volume 16, Issue 2, June 1998, Pages: 271–296, Murray S. Levin

    Article first published online : 6 MAY 2008, DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1722.1998.tb00268.x

  10. The Effect of Blinded Experts on Juror Verdicts

    Journal of Empirical Legal Studies

    Volume 9, Issue 4, December 2012, Pages: 765–794, Christopher T. Robertson and David V. Yokum

    Article first published online : 6 NOV 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2012.01273.x

  11. Dissecting Damages: An Empirical Exploration of Sexual Harassment Awards

    Journal of Empirical Legal Studies

    Volume 3, Issue 1, March 2006, Pages: 1–45, Catherine M. Sharkey

    Article first published online : 27 FEB 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2006.00061.x

  12. Head Over the Heart or Heart Over the Head? Cognitive Experiential Self-Theory and Extralegal Heuristics in Juror Decision Making

    Journal of Applied Social Psychology

    Volume 32, Issue 12, December 2002, Pages: 2526–2553, Joel D. Lieberman

    Article first published online : 31 JUL 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb02755.x

  13. Expert Testimony by Ethicists: What Should be the Norm?

    The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics

    Volume 33, Issue 2, June 2005, Pages: 198–221, Edward J. Imwinkelried

    Article first published online : 24 JAN 2007, DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2005.tb00487.x

  14. David, Goliath, and reverend Bayes: Prior beliefs about defendants' status in personal injury cases

    Applied Cognitive Psychology

    Volume 8, Issue 3, June 1994, Pages: 233–258, Brian H. Bornstein

    Article first published online : 13 FEB 2006, DOI: 10.1002/acp.2350080304

  15. A comparison of students' and jury panelists' decision-making in split recovery cases

    Behavioral Sciences & the Law

    Volume 29, Issue 3, May/June 2011, Pages: 358–375, Paul Fox, Twila Wingrove and Courtney Pfeifer

    Article first published online : 8 FEB 2011, DOI: 10.1002/bsl.968

  16. CHALLENGING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF PUNITIVE DAMAGES: PUTTING RULES OF REASON ON AN UNBOUNDED LEGAL REMEDY

    American Business Law Journal

    Volume 28, Issue 3, September 1990, Pages: 485–497, VICTOR E. SCHWARTZ and LIBERTY MAGARIAN

    Article first published online : 22 AUG 2007, DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1714.1990.tb00836.x

  17. DUE PROCESS RIGHT TO JUDICIAL REVIEW OF ARBITRAL PUNITIVE DAMAGES AWARDS

    American Business Law Journal

    Volume 32, Issue 4, February 1996, Pages: 583–626, KENNETH R. DAVIS

    Article first published online : 28 JUN 2008, DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1714.1995.tb01539.x

  18. The cognitive effects of jury aids on decision-making in complex civil litigation

    Applied Cognitive Psychology

    Volume 19, Issue 7, November 2005, Pages: 867–884, Lynne Forsterlee, Leeana Kent and Irwin A. Horowitz

    Article first published online : 15 APR 2005, DOI: 10.1002/acp.1124

  19. Juror decisions about damages in employment discrimination cases

    Behavioral Sciences & the Law

    Volume 17, Issue 1, January/March 1999, Pages: 107–121, Edith Greene, Cheryl Downey and Jane Goodman-Delahunty

    Article first published online : 30 MAR 1999, DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0798(199901/03)17:1<107::AID-BSL330>3.0.CO;2-X

  20. Procedural Mechanisms and Jury Behavior

    Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Group Processes

    R. Scott Tindale, Janice Nadler, Andrea Krebel, James H. Davis, Pages: 574–602, 2008

    Published Online : 14 JAN 2008, DOI: 10.1002/9780470998458.ch24

VIEW

  1. 1 - 20
  2. 21 - 40
  3. 41 - 60
  4. 61 - 80
  5. Next >