Search Results

There are 7182 results for: content related to: Parenting plan evaluation standards and guidelines for psychologists: Setting the frame

  1. SETTLEMENT-FOCUSED PARENTING PLAN CONSULTATIONS: AN EVALUATIVE MEDIATION ALTERNATIVE TO CHILD CUSTODY EVALUATIONS

    Family Court Review

    Volume 49, Issue 1, January 2011, Pages: 59–71, Daniel B. Pickar and Jeffrey J. Kahn

    Article first published online : 18 JAN 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2010.01353.x

  2. THE EMERGING FORENSIC ROLE FOR WORK PRODUCT REVIEW AND CASE ANALYSIS IN CHILD ACCESS AND PARENTING PLAN DISPUTES

    Family Court Review

    Volume 49, Issue 4, October 2011, Pages: 737–749, William G. Austin, H. D. Kirkpatrick and James R. Flens

    Article first published online : 10 OCT 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2011.01410.x

  3. Parenting Plans for Special Needs Children: Applying a Risk-Assessment Model

    Family Court Review

    Volume 53, Issue 1, January 2015, Pages: 113–133, Daniel B. Pickar and Robert L. Kaufman

    Article first published online : 16 JAN 2015, DOI: 10.1111/fcre.12134

  4. The Place for Custody Evaluations in Family Peacemaking

    Family Court Review

    Volume 53, Issue 3, July 2015, Pages: 407–417, Mary Elizabeth Lund

    Article first published online : 14 JUL 2015, DOI: 10.1111/fcre.12162

  5. Parental Gatekeeping and Child Custody/Child Access Evaluation: Part I: Conceptual Framework, Research, and Application

    Family Court Review

    Volume 51, Issue 3, July 2013, Pages: 485–501, William G. Austin, Marsha Kline Pruett, H.D. Kirkpatrick, James R. Flens and Jonathan W. Gould

    Article first published online : 22 AUG 2013, DOI: 10.1111/fcre.12045

  6. Special Considerations in Conducting Psychological Custody Evaluations with Military Families

    Family Court Review

    Volume 52, Issue 3, July 2014, Pages: 440–457, Robert A. Simon

    Article first published online : 21 JUL 2014, DOI: 10.1111/fcre.12103

  7. Child Custody Evaluations: Current Literature and Practical Applications

    Chapter

    Handbook of Psychology, Second Edition

    Jonathan W. Gould and David A. Martindale

    Published Online : 26 SEP 2012, DOI: 10.1002/9781118133880.hop211006

  8. From the Rule of One to Shared Parenting: Custody Presumptions in Law and Policy

    Family Court Review

    Volume 52, Issue 2, April 2014, Pages: 213–239, J. Herbie DiFonzo

    Article first published online : 21 APR 2014, DOI: 10.1111/fcre.12086

  9. You have free access to this content
    Special Considerations in Child Custody Evaluations for Children with High-Functioning Autism Spectrum Disorder

    Family Court Review

    Volume 54, Issue 1, January 2016, Pages: 81–95, Sol R. Rappaport, Cecily Kanter and Kara Anast

    Article first published online : 21 JAN 2016, DOI: 10.1111/fcre.12206

  10. Child Custody

    Standard Article

    The Encyclopedia of Clinical Psychology

    Kathryn Kuehnle, H. D. Kirkpatrick and Leslie Drozd

    Published Online : 23 JAN 2015, DOI: 10.1002/9781118625392.wbecp450

  11. An Historical Look at Child Custody Evaluations and the Influence of AFCC

    Family Court Review

    Volume 51, Issue 1, January 2013, Pages: 42–47, Philip M. Stahl and Lorraine Martin

    Article first published online : 8 JAN 2013, DOI: 10.1111/fcre.12006

  12. MODEL STANDARDS OF PRACTICE FOR CHILD CUSTODY EVALUATION

    Family Court Review

    Volume 45, Issue 1, January 2007, Pages: 70–91, Task Force for Model Standards of Practice for Child Custody Evaluation, David A. Martindale, Lorraine Martin, William G. Austin, Leslie Drozd, Dianna Gould-Saltman, H. D. Kirkpatrick, Kathryn Kuehnle, Debra Kulak, Denise McColley, Arnold Sheinvold, Jeffrey Siegel and Philip M. Stahl

    Article first published online : 7 DEC 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2007.129_3.x

  13. MENTAL HEALTH CONSULTANTS AND CHILD CUSTODY EVALUATIONS: A DISCUSSION PAPER

    Family Court Review

    Volume 49, Issue 4, October 2011, Pages: 723–736, Association of Family and Conciliation Courts and Child Custody Consultant Task Force

    Article first published online : 10 OCT 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2011.01409.x

  14. Closing the Gap: Research, Policy, Practice, and Shared Parenting

    Family Court Review

    Volume 52, Issue 2, April 2014, Pages: 152–174, Marsha Kline Pruett and J. Herbie DiFonzo

    Article first published online : 21 APR 2014, DOI: 10.1111/fcre.12078

  15. You have free access to this content
    Best Interests of the Special Needs Child: Mandating Consideration of the Child's Mental Health

    Family Court Review

    Volume 54, Issue 1, January 2016, Pages: 68–80, Hindi Mermelstein, Jamie A. Rosen and Carolyn Reinach Wolf

    Article first published online : 21 JAN 2016, DOI: 10.1111/fcre.12205

  16. CHILD CUSTODY EVALUATIONS: THE NEED FOR SYSTEMS-LEVEL OUTCOME ASSESSMENTS

    Family Court Review

    Volume 47, Issue 2, April 2009, Pages: 286–303, Robert F. Kelly and Sarah H. Ramsey

    Article first published online : 13 MAR 2009, DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2009.01255.x

  17. Reflections of Leadership: Fifty Years of the Association of Family and Conciliation Courts

    Family Court Review

    Volume 51, Issue 1, January 2013, Pages: 10–19, Peter Salem

    Article first published online : 8 JAN 2013, DOI: 10.1111/fcre.12002

  18. Transitioning to Postdivorce Family Life: A Grounded Theory Investigation of Resilience in Coparenting

    Family Relations

    Volume 63, Issue 3, July 2014, Pages: 411–423, Tyler B. Jamison, Marilyn Coleman, Lawrence H. Ganong and Richard E. Feistman

    Article first published online : 4 JUN 2014, DOI: 10.1111/fare.12074

  19. The Sieve Model: An innovative process for identifying alternatives to custody evaluations

    Conflict Resolution Quarterly

    Volume 26, Issue 3, Spring 2009, Pages: 333–348, Robert B. Silver and Deborah Coe Silver

    Article first published online : 25 MAR 2009, DOI: 10.1002/crq.236

  20. COMMENTARY ON TIPPINS AND WITTMANN'S “EMPIRICAL AND ETHICAL PROBLEMS WITH CUSTODY RECOMMENDATIONS:

    Family Court Review

    Volume 43, Issue 2, April 2005, Pages: 233–241, Joan B. Kelly and Janet R. Johnston

    Article first published online : 3 MAY 2005, DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2005.00022.x