Search Results

There are 6518 results for: content related to: Use of third party information in child custody evaluations

  1. CHILD CUSTODY EVALUATIONS: THE NEED FOR SYSTEMS-LEVEL OUTCOME ASSESSMENTS

    Family Court Review

    Volume 47, Issue 2, April 2009, Pages: 286–303, Robert F. Kelly and Sarah H. Ramsey

    Version of Record online : 13 MAR 2009, DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2009.01255.x

  2. Child Custody Evaluations: Current Literature and Practical Applications

    Chapter

    Handbook of Psychology, Second Edition

    Jonathan W. Gould and David A. Martindale

    Published Online : 26 SEP 2012, DOI: 10.1002/9781118133880.hop211006

  3. CONSULTANT CONDUCT IN ANTICIPATION OF A CHILD CUSTODY EVALUATION: ETHICAL AND SOCIAL DILEMMAS AND THE NEED FOR NEUTRAL PARENT EDUCATION

    Family Court Review

    Volume 49, Issue 1, January 2011, Pages: 155–169, Lauren Barth

    Version of Record online : 18 JAN 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2010.01359.x

  4. An Historical Look at Child Custody Evaluations and the Influence of AFCC

    Family Court Review

    Volume 51, Issue 1, January 2013, Pages: 42–47, Philip M. Stahl and Lorraine Martin

    Version of Record online : 8 JAN 2013, DOI: 10.1111/fcre.12006

  5. MENTAL HEALTH CONSULTANTS AND CHILD CUSTODY EVALUATIONS: A DISCUSSION PAPER

    Family Court Review

    Volume 49, Issue 4, October 2011, Pages: 723–736, Association of Family and Conciliation Courts and Child Custody Consultant Task Force

    Version of Record online : 10 OCT 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2011.01409.x

  6. SCIENTIFICALLY CRAFTED CHILD CUSTODY EVALUATIONS

    Family Court Review

    Volume 37, Issue 2, April 1999, Pages: 159–178, Jonathan W. Gould

    Version of Record online : 15 MAR 2005, DOI: 10.1111/j.174-1617.1999.tb00534.x

  7. SETTLEMENT-FOCUSED PARENTING PLAN CONSULTATIONS: AN EVALUATIVE MEDIATION ALTERNATIVE TO CHILD CUSTODY EVALUATIONS

    Family Court Review

    Volume 49, Issue 1, January 2011, Pages: 59–71, Daniel B. Pickar and Jeffrey J. Kahn

    Version of Record online : 18 JAN 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2010.01353.x

  8. Special Considerations in Conducting Psychological Custody Evaluations with Military Families

    Family Court Review

    Volume 52, Issue 3, July 2014, Pages: 440–457, Robert A. Simon

    Version of Record online : 21 JUL 2014, DOI: 10.1111/fcre.12103

  9. Play by the Rules: why States Should Adopt Uniform Court Rules for Forensic Psychologists in Child Custody Evaluations

    Family Court Review

    Volume 54, Issue 3, July 2016, Pages: 512–524, Tiffani DiPrizito

    Version of Record online : 6 JUL 2016, DOI: 10.1111/fcre.12227

  10. THE ART AND SCIENCE OF CHILD CUSTODY EVALUATIONS

    Family Court Review

    Volume 38, Issue 3, July 2000, Pages: 392–414, Jonathan W. Gould and Philip M. Stahl

    Version of Record online : 15 MAR 2005, DOI: 10.1111/j.174-1617.2000.tb00581.x

  11. IMPROVED ASSESSMENT OF CHILD CUSTODY CASES INVOLVING COMBAT VETERANS WITH POSTTRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER

    Family Court Review

    Volume 50, Issue 2, April 2012, Pages: 310–343, Evan R. Seamone

    Version of Record online : 1 MAR 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2012.01439.x

  12. PARTNERS IN THE PROCESS: HOW ATTORNEYS PREPARE THEIR CLIENTS FOR CUSTODY EVALUATIONS AND LITIGATION

    Family Court Review

    Volume 49, Issue 4, October 2011, Pages: 750–759, James N. Bow, Michael C. Gottlieb, Hon. Dianna J. Gould-Saltman and Lesly Hendershot

    Version of Record online : 10 OCT 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2011.01411.x

  13. MANDATED CUSTODY EVALUATIONS AND THE LIMITS OF JUDICIAL POWER

    Family Court Review

    Volume 47, Issue 2, April 2009, Pages: 304–320, Mary E. O’Connell

    Version of Record online : 13 MAR 2009, DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2009.01256.x

  14. RELYING ON THE UNRELIABLE: HOW A COURT RULE COULD ALLEVIATE THE PROBLEMS INHERENT IN THE NEUTRAL MENTAL HEALTH EVALUATION PROCESS IN CHILD CUSTODY CASES

    Family Court Review

    Volume 48, Issue 3, July 2010, Pages: 571–582, Michael Terzuoli

    Version of Record online : 23 JUN 2010, DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2010.01331.x

  15. THE EMERGING FORENSIC ROLE FOR WORK PRODUCT REVIEW AND CASE ANALYSIS IN CHILD ACCESS AND PARENTING PLAN DISPUTES

    Family Court Review

    Volume 49, Issue 4, October 2011, Pages: 737–749, William G. Austin, H. D. Kirkpatrick and James R. Flens

    Version of Record online : 10 OCT 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2011.01410.x

  16. Child Custody Evaluation

    Standard Article

    Handbook of Psychology

    Randy K. Otto, Jacqueline K. Buffington-Vollum and John F. Edens

    Published Online : 15 APR 2003, DOI: 10.1002/0471264385.wei1111

  17. MODEL STANDARDS OF PRACTICE FOR CHILD CUSTODY EVALUATION

    Family Court Review

    Volume 45, Issue 1, January 2007, Pages: 70–91, Task Force for Model Standards of Practice for Child Custody Evaluation, David A. Martindale, Lorraine Martin, William G. Austin, Leslie Drozd, Dianna Gould-Saltman, H. D. Kirkpatrick, Kathryn Kuehnle, Debra Kulak, Denise McColley, Arnold Sheinvold, Jeffrey Siegel and Philip M. Stahl

    Version of Record online : 7 DEC 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2007.129_3.x

  18. CHILD CUSTODY EVALUATION PRACTICES: A 20-YEAR FOLLOW-UP

    Family Court Review

    Volume 49, Issue 3, July 2011, Pages: 618–628, Marc J. Ackerman and Tracy Brey Pritzl

    Version of Record online : 21 JUL 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2011.01397.x

  19. Forensic Methods and Procedures Applied to Child Custody Evaluations: What Judges Need to Know in Determining a Competent Forensic Work Product

    Juvenile and Family Court Journal

    Volume 51, Issue 3, July 2000, Pages: 21–29, JONATHAN W. GOULD and JUDGE LISA C. BELL

    Version of Record online : 14 JUL 2009, DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-6988.2000.tb00023.x

  20. A Systematic Approach to Domestic Abuse–Informed Child Custody Decision Making in Family Law Cases

    Family Court Review

    Volume 53, Issue 4, October 2015, Pages: 565–577, Gabrielle Davis

    Version of Record online : 17 OCT 2015, DOI: 10.1111/fcre.12173