Search Results

There are 33882 results for: content related to: Defense attorneys' concerns about the competence of adolescent defendants

  1. A Community-Based Model for Remediating Juveniles Adjudicated Incompetent to Stand Trial: Feedback from Youth, Attorneys, and Judges

    Juvenile and Family Court Journal

    Volume 65, Issue 2, Spring 2014, Pages: 23–38, Shelly L. Jackson, Janet I. Warren and Jessica Jones Coburn

    Version of Record online : 6 JUN 2014, DOI: 10.1111/jfcj.12017

  2. Juvenile Courts and Competency to Stand Trial

    Sociology Compass

    Volume 5, Issue 6, June 2011, Pages: 439–451, Angela Harvey

    Version of Record online : 25 MAY 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-9020.2011.00377.x

  3. ENSURING AUTHENTIC YOUTH PARTICIPATION IN DELINQUENCY CASES: CREATING A PARADIGM FOR SPECIALIZED JUVENILE DEFENSE PRACTICE

    Family Court Review

    Volume 45, Issue 3, July 2007, Pages: 466–484, Patricia Puritz and Katayoon Majd

    Version of Record online : 26 MAY 2007, DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2007.00162.x

  4. Forensic Evaluation in Delinquency Cases

    Chapter

    Handbook of Psychology, Second Edition

    Thomas Grisso and Christina L. Riggs Romaine

    Published Online : 26 SEP 2012, DOI: 10.1002/9781118133880.hop211016

  5. Real Interrogation: What Actually Happens When Cops Question Kids

    Law & Society Review

    Volume 47, Issue 1, March 2013, Pages: 1–36, Barry C. Feld

    Version of Record online : 21 FEB 2013, DOI: 10.1111/lasr.12000

  6. Ten Year Research Update (2001–2010): Evaluations for Competence to Stand Trial (Adjudicative Competence)

    Behavioral Sciences & the Law

    Volume 31, Issue 2, March/April 2013, Pages: 165–191, Michael H. Fogel, Wendy Schiffman, Denise Mumley, Chad Tillbrook and Thomas Grisso

    Version of Record online : 24 JAN 2013, DOI: 10.1002/bsl.2051

  7. Information technology support for communities of practice: How public defenders learn about winning and losing in court

    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

    Volume 58, Issue 1, 1 January 2007, Pages: 76–87, Noriko Hara

    Version of Record online : 10 NOV 2006, DOI: 10.1002/asi.20445

  8. Diverting and Abdicating Judicial Discretion: Cultural, Political, and Procedural Dynamics in California Juvenile Justice

    Law & Society Review

    Volume 41, Issue 2, June 2007, Pages: 387–428, Alexes Harris

    Version of Record online : 18 MAY 2007, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5893.2007.00302.x

  9. Damage Anchors on Real Juries

    Journal of Empirical Legal Studies

    Volume 8, Issue s1, December 2011, Pages: 148–178, Shari Seidman Diamond, Mary R. Rose, Beth Murphy and John Meixner

    Version of Record online : 22 NOV 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2011.01232.x

  10. You have free access to this content
    The Forces of Conviction: The Power and Practice of Mandatory Prosecution upon Misdemeanor Domestic Battery Suspects

    Law & Social Inquiry

    Volume 32, Issue 1, March 2007, Pages: 41–74, Keith Guzik

    Version of Record online : 2 MAR 2007, DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-4469.2007.00049.x

  11. Criminal Case Complexity: An Empirical Perspective

    Journal of Empirical Legal Studies

    Volume 1, Issue 2, July 2004, Pages: 331–369, Michael Heise

    Version of Record online : 14 JUN 2004, DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2004.00010.x

  12. Voir Dire and Jury Selection

    Standard Article

    Handbook of Psychology

    Margaret Bull Kovera, Jason J. Dickinson and Brian L. Cutler

    Published Online : 15 APR 2003, DOI: 10.1002/0471264385.wei1110

  13. Leveling the Odds: The Effect of Quality Legal Representation in Cases of Asymmetrical Capability

    Law & Society Review

    Volume 49, Issue 1, March 2015, Pages: 209–239, Banks Miller, Linda Camp Keith and Jennifer S. Holmes

    Version of Record online : 19 FEB 2015, DOI: 10.1111/lasr.12123

  14. Assessment of Competence to Stand Trial

    Standard Article

    Handbook of Psychology

    Kathleen Powers Stafford

    Published Online : 15 APR 2003, DOI: 10.1002/0471264385.wei1119

  15. Developmental Incompetence to Stand Trial in Juvenile Courts

    Journal of Forensic Sciences

    Volume 57, Issue 4, July 2012, Pages: 989–996, Philip C. O’Donnell and Bruce Gross

    Version of Record online : 2 MAR 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2012.02093.x

  16. Predicting Civil Jury Verdicts: How Attorneys Use (and Misuse) a Second Opinion

    Journal of Empirical Legal Studies

    Volume 8, Issue s1, December 2011, Pages: 99–119, Jonas Jacobson, Jasmine Dobbs-Marsh, Varda Liberman and Julia A. Minson

    Version of Record online : 22 NOV 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2011.01229.x

  17. Sentencing Determinations in Death Penalty Cases

    Chapter

    Handbook of Psychology, Second Edition

    Mark D. Cunningham and Alan M. Goldstein

    Published Online : 26 SEP 2012, DOI: 10.1002/9781118133880.hop211020

  18. Social Psychology and Law

    Chapter

    Handbook of Social Psychology

    Margaret Bull Kovera and Eugene Borgida

    Published Online : 30 JUN 2010, DOI: 10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy002035

  19. Legal Representation in the Juvenile Dependency System: Travis County, Texas’ Parent Representation Pilot Project

    Family Court Review

    Volume 54, Issue 2, April 2016, Pages: 277–287, Steve M. Wood, Alicia Summers and Crystal Soderman Duarte

    Version of Record online : 20 APR 2016, DOI: 10.1111/fcre.12218

  20. AN EXPLICIT TEST OF PLEA BARGAINING IN THE “SHADOW OF THE TRIAL”

    Criminology

    Volume 52, Issue 4, November 2014, Pages: 723–754, SHAWN D. BUSHWAY, ALLISON D. REDLICH and ROBERT J. NORRIS

    Version of Record online : 20 NOV 2014, DOI: 10.1111/1745-9125.12054