Search Results

There are 11950 results for: content related to: The pattern of breast cancer screening utilization and its consequences

  1. You have free access to this content
    Mammographic screening: Patterns of use and estimated impact on breast carcinoma survival

    Cancer

    Volume 101, Issue 3, 1 August 2004, Pages: 495–507, Karen Blanchard, James A. Colbert, Dhruv Puri, Joel Weissman, Beverly Moy, Daniel B. Kopans, Emily M. Kaine, Richard H. Moore, Elkan F. Halpern, Kevin S. Hughes, Kenneth K. Tanabe, Barbara L. Smith and James S. Michaelson

    Version of Record online : 21 JUN 2004, DOI: 10.1002/cncr.20392

  2. You have free access to this content
    Increased Patient Concern After False-positive Mammograms

    Journal of General Internal Medicine

    Volume 16, Issue 3, March 2001, Pages: 150–156, Mary B. Barton, Sara Moore, Sarah Polk, Ernest Shtatland, Joann G. Elmore and Suzanne W. Fletcher

    Version of Record online : 9 JUN 2004, DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2001.00329.x

  3. Interventions for relieving the pain and discomfort of screening mammography

    Intervention Review

    The Cochrane Library

    Dawn Miller, Vicki Livingstone and G Peter Herbison

    Published Online : 23 JAN 2008, DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002942.pub2

  4. You have free access to this content
    Mammography utilization after a benign breast biopsy among hispanic and non-Hispanic women

    Cancer

    Volume 91, Issue 9, 1 May 2001, Pages: 1716–1723, Christine A. Stidley, Kristine Tollestrup, Floyd Frost, Edward J. Bedrick and Hans V. Petersen

    Version of Record online : 27 APR 2001, DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(20010501)91:9<1716::AID-CNCR1189>3.0.CO;2-0

  5. BREAST CANCERS INVISIBLE ON MAMMOGRAPHY

    Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery

    Volume 70, Issue 3, March 2000, Pages: 162–167, L. M. Foxcroft, E. B. Evans, H. K. Joshua and C. Hirst

    Version of Record online : 24 DEC 2001, DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1622.2000.01763.x

  6. You have free access to this content
    Why do large breast cancers still present in a population offered screening?

    International Journal of Cancer

    Volume 123, Issue 12, 15 December 2008, Pages: 2907–2914, Anne Kricker, Beth Newman, Dorota M. Gertig, Chris Goumas, Jane Armes and Bruce K. Armstrong

    Version of Record online : 3 SEP 2008, DOI: 10.1002/ijc.23829

  7. You have free access to this content
    Linked claims and medical records for cancer case management

    Cancer

    Volume 110, Issue 3, 1 August 2007, Pages: 518–524, Margaret M. Eberl, Nancy Watroba, Marc Reinhardt, Jay Pomerantz, Joseph Serghany, Gregory Broffman, Chester H. Fox, Martin C. Mahoney and Stephen B. Edge

    Version of Record online : 18 JUN 2007, DOI: 10.1002/cncr.22808

  8. Mammogram Use and Self-Efficacy in an Urban Minority Population

    Public Health Nursing

    Volume 32, Issue 4, July/August 2015, Pages: 287–297, Bonnie Jerome-D'Emilia and Patricia Dunphy Suplee

    Version of Record online : 21 OCT 2014, DOI: 10.1111/phn.12162

  9. Acceptability of Mobile Mammography Among Community-Dwelling Older Women

    Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

    Volume 45, Issue 11, November 1997, Pages: 1365–1370, Jennifer R. Levin, Susan H. Hirsch, Roshan Bastani, Patricia A. Ganz, Marci L. Lovett and David B. Reuben

    Version of Record online : 27 APR 2015, DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1997.tb02938.x

  10. You have free access to this content
    5-Year mammography rates and associated factors for older women

    Cancer

    Volume 97, Issue 5, 1 March 2003, Pages: 1147–1155, R. Van Harrison, Nancy K. Janz, Robert A. Wolfe, Philip J. Tedeschi, Xuelin Huang and Laurence F. McMahon Jr.

    Version of Record online : 20 FEB 2003, DOI: 10.1002/cncr.11172

  11. You have free access to this content
    Poor Patient Comprehension of Abnormal Mammography Results

    Journal of General Internal Medicine

    Volume 20, Issue 5, May 2005, Pages: 432–437, Leah S. Karliner, Celia Patricia Kaplan, Teresa Juarbe, Rena Pasick and Eliseo J. Pérez-Stable

    Version of Record online : 31 MAR 2005, DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.40281.x

  12. You have free access to this content
    Gauging the impact of breast carcinoma screening in terms of tumor size and death rate

    Cancer

    Volume 98, Issue 10, 15 November 2003, Pages: 2114–2124, James S. Michaelson, Sameer Satija, Daniel Kopans, Richard Moore, Melvin Silverstein, Arthur Comegno, Kevin Hughes, Alphonse Taghian, Simon Powell and Barbara Smith

    Version of Record online : 15 OCT 2003, DOI: 10.1002/cncr.11766

  13. You have free access to this content
    Increased mammography use and its impact on earlier breast cancer detection in Vermont, 1975–1999

    Cancer

    Volume 94, Issue 8, 15 April 2002, Pages: 2160–2168, Pamela M. Vacek, Berta M. Geller, Donald L. Weaver and Roger S. Foster Jr.

    Version of Record online : 15 APR 2002, DOI: 10.1002/cncr.10459

  14. Overuse of mammography during the first round of an organized breast cancer screening programme

    Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice

    Volume 15, Issue 4, August 2009, Pages: 620–625, Eric Chamot, Agathe Charvet and Thomas V. Perneger

    Version of Record online : 10 JUN 2009, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.01062.x

  15. You have free access to this content
    Perceptions of insurance coverage for screening mammography among women in need of screening

    Cancer

    Volume 103, Issue 12, 15 June 2005, Pages: 2473–2480, Ann Scheck McAlearney, Katherine W. Reeves, Cathy Tatum and Electra D. Paskett

    Version of Record online : 9 MAY 2005, DOI: 10.1002/cncr.21068

  16. You have free access to this content
    Minimizing misclassification of hormone users at mammography screening

    International Journal of Cancer

    Volume 124, Issue 9, 1 May 2009, Pages: 2159–2165, Sisse Helle Njor, Anette Tønnes Pedersen, Walter Schwartz, Jesper Hallas and Elsebeth Lynge

    Version of Record online : 24 NOV 2008, DOI: 10.1002/ijc.24181

  17. Using Medicare Data to Estimate the Prevalence of Breast Cancer Screening in Older Women: Comparison of Different Methods to Identify Screening Mammograms

    Health Services Research

    Volume 37, Issue 6, December 2002, Pages: 1643–1657, Whitney M Randolph, Jonathan D Mahnken, James S Goodwin and Jean L Freeman

    Version of Record online : 18 DEC 2002, DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.10912

  18. Position of Clip Placement After Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy: Is a Unilateral Two-View Postbiopsy Mammogram Necessary?

    The Breast Journal

    Volume 9, Issue 4, July 2003, Pages: 272–276, Constance D. Lehman and Jennifer E. Shook

    Version of Record online : 14 JUL 2003, DOI: 10.1046/j.1524-4741.2003.09404.x

  19. The Effect of Immediate Reading of Screening Mammograms on Medical Care Utilization and Costs after False-Positive Mammograms

    Health Services Research

    Volume 42, Issue 4, August 2007, Pages: 1464–1482, Kate A. Stewart, Peter J. Neumann, Suzanne W. Fletcher and Mary B. Barton

    Version of Record online : 11 OCT 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00660.x

  20. You have free access to this content
    Screening mammography performance and cancer detection among black women and white women in community practice

    Cancer

    Volume 100, Issue 1, 1 January 2004, Pages: 139–148, Karminder S. Gill and Bonnie C. Yankaskas

    Version of Record online : 12 NOV 2003, DOI: 10.1002/cncr.11878