Search Results

There are 19544 results for: content related to: Routine mammography is associated with earlier stage disease and greater eligibility for breast conservation in breast carcinoma patients age 40 years and older

  1. Mammography Use, Breast Cancer Stage at Diagnosis, and Survival Among Older Women

    Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

    Volume 48, Issue 10, October 2000, Pages: 1226–1233, Ellen P. McCarthy, Risa B. Burns, Karen M. Freund, Arlene S. Ash, Michael Shwartz, Sandra L. Marwill and Mark A. Moskowitz

    Version of Record online : 27 APR 2015, DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb02595.x

  2. You have free access to this content
    Do nonattenders in mammography screening programmes seek mammography elsewhere?

    International Journal of Cancer

    Volume 113, Issue 3, 20 January 2005, Pages: 464–470, Allan Jensen, Anne Helene Olsen, My von Euler-Chelpin, Sisse Helle Njor, Ilse Vejborg and Elsebeth Lynge

    Version of Record online : 28 SEP 2004, DOI: 10.1002/ijc.20604

  3. Interventions for relieving the pain and discomfort of screening mammography

    Intervention Review

    The Cochrane Library

    Dawn Miller, Vicki Livingstone and G Peter Herbison

    Published Online : 23 JAN 2008, DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002942.pub2

  4. Health Beliefs and Mammography Rates of Turkish Women Living in Rural Areas

    Journal of Nursing Scholarship

    Volume 40, Issue 2, June 2008, Pages: 170–175, Ilknur Aydin Avci and Hatice Kurt

    Version of Record online : 27 MAY 2008, DOI: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2008.00222.x

  5. You have free access to this content
    Trends in breast biopsy pathology diagnoses among women undergoing mammography in the United States: A report from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium

    Cancer

    Volume 121, Issue 9, May 1, 2015, Pages: 1369–1378, Kimberly H. Allison, Linn A. Abraham, Donald L. Weaver, Anna N. A. Tosteson, Heidi D. Nelson, Tracy Onega, Berta M. Geller, Karla Kerlikowske, Patricia A. Carney, Laura E. Ichikawa, Diana S. M. Buist and Joann G. Elmore

    Version of Record online : 20 JAN 2015, DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29199

  6. Patterns of regular use of mammography—Body weight and ethnicity: The Multiethnic Cohort

    Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners

    Volume 22, Issue 3, March 2010, Pages: 162–169, Quannetta T. Edwards, Arthur Li, Malcolm C. Pike, Laurence Kolonel, Brian E. Henderson and Roberta McKean-Cowdin

    Version of Record online : 2 MAR 2010, DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2009.00488.x

  7. You have free access to this content
    5-Year mammography rates and associated factors for older women

    Cancer

    Volume 97, Issue 5, 1 March 2003, Pages: 1147–1155, R. Van Harrison, Nancy K. Janz, Robert A. Wolfe, Philip J. Tedeschi, Xuelin Huang and Laurence F. McMahon Jr.

    Version of Record online : 20 FEB 2003, DOI: 10.1002/cncr.11172

  8. You have free access to this content
    Mammography screening in African American women

    Cancer

    Volume 97, Issue S1, 1 January 2003, Pages: 258–272, Beth A. Jones, Elizabeth A. Patterson and Lisa Calvocoressi

    Version of Record online : 18 DEC 2002, DOI: 10.1002/cncr.11022

  9. You have free access to this content
    Characteristics of primary care physicians and their practices associated with mammography rates for older women

    Cancer

    Volume 98, Issue 9, 1 November 2003, Pages: 1822–1829, R. Van Harrison, Nancy K. Janz, Robert A. Wolfe, Philip J. Tedeschi, Jeoffrey K. Stross, Xuelin Huang and Laurence F. McMahon Jr.

    Version of Record online : 25 SEP 2003, DOI: 10.1002/cncr.11744

  10. Variability in Mammography Use Among Older Women

    Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

    Volume 44, Issue 8, August 1996, Pages: 922–926, Risa B. Burns, Ellen P. McCarthy, Karen M. Freund, Sandra L. Marwill, Michael Shwartz, Arlene Ash and Mark A. Moskowitz

    Version of Record online : 27 APR 2015, DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1996.tb01861.x

  11. You have free access to this content
    Decision Making and Counseling around Mammography Screening for Women Aged 80 or Older

    Journal of General Internal Medicine

    Volume 21, Issue 9, September 2006, Pages: 979–985, Mara A. Schonberg, Radhika A. Ramanan, Ellen P. McCarthy and Edward R. Marcantonio

    Version of Record online : 31 MAY 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00487.x

  12. You have free access to this content
    Relation between the method of detection of initial breast carcinoma and the method of detection of subsequent ipsilateral local recurrence and contralateral breast carcinoma

    Cancer

    Volume 98, Issue 8, 15 October 2003, Pages: 1596–1602, Changhu Chen, Susan G. Orel, Eleanor E. R. Harris, Wei-Ting Hwang and Lawrence J. Solin

    Version of Record online : 14 AUG 2003, DOI: 10.1002/cncr.11685

  13. You have free access to this content
    Changes in the availability of screening mammography, 2000–2010

    Cancer

    Volume 119, Issue 21, 1 November 2013, Pages: 3847–3853, Elena B. Elkin, Coral L. Atoria, Nicole Leoce, Peter B. Bach and Deborah Schrag

    Version of Record online : 13 AUG 2013, DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28305

  14. Cost and cost-effectiveness of digital mammography compared with film-screen mammography in Australia

    Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health

    Volume 33, Issue 5, October 2009, Pages: 430–436, Shuhong Wang, Tracy Merlin, Florian Kreisz, Paul Craft and Janet E. Hiller

    Version of Record online : 6 OCT 2009, DOI: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2009.00424.x

  15. You have free access to this content
    Increased mammography use and its impact on earlier breast cancer detection in Vermont, 1975–1999

    Cancer

    Volume 94, Issue 8, 15 April 2002, Pages: 2160–2168, Pamela M. Vacek, Berta M. Geller, Donald L. Weaver and Roger S. Foster Jr.

    Version of Record online : 15 APR 2002, DOI: 10.1002/cncr.10459

  16. Mammographic density is the main correlate of tumors detected on ultrasound but not on mammography

    International Journal of Cancer

    Volume 139, Issue 9, 01 November 2016, Pages: 1967–1974, Lothar Häberle, Peter A. Fasching, Barbara Brehm, Katharina Heusinger, Sebastian M. Jud, Christian R. Loehberg, Carolin C. Hack, Caroline Preuss, Michael P. Lux, Arndt Hartmann, Celine M. Vachon, Martina Meier-Meitinger, Michael Uder, Matthias W. Beckmann and Rüdiger Schulz-Wendtland

    Version of Record online : 19 JUL 2016, DOI: 10.1002/ijc.30261

  17. An evaluation of post-lumpectomy recurrence rates: Is follow-up every 6 months for 2 years needed?

    Journal of Surgical Oncology

    Volume 107, Issue 6, 1 May 2013, Pages: 597–601, David McNaul, Maxine Darke, Megha Garg and Paul Dale

    Version of Record online : 27 DEC 2012, DOI: 10.1002/jso.23298

  18. Improving the Timeliness of Written Patient Notification of Mammography Results by Mammography Centers

    The Breast Journal

    Volume 10, Issue 1, January 2004, Pages: 10–19, Robert M. Boudreau, Colleen McNally, Edna M. Rensing and Miriam K. Campbell

    Version of Record online : 7 JAN 2004, DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2004.09608.x

  19. You have free access to this content
    Performance of clinical mammography: A nationwide study from Denmark

    International Journal of Cancer

    Volume 119, Issue 1, 1 July 2006, Pages: 183–191, Allan Jensen, Ilse Vejborg, Niels Severinsen, Susanne Nielsen, Fritz Rank, Gerd Just Mikkelsen, Jørgen Hilden, Dorte Vistisen, Uffe Dyreborg and Elsebeth Lynge

    Version of Record online : 31 JAN 2006, DOI: 10.1002/ijc.21811

  20. A Comparison of Mammography and Ultrasound in Women with Breast Disease: A Receiver Operating Characteristic Analysis

    The Breast Journal

    Volume 18, Issue 2, March/April 2012, Pages: 130–138, Xuexiang Ying, Yanping Lin, Xiaotian Xia, Bin Hu, Zhuhua Zhu and Pingqing He

    Version of Record online : 23 FEB 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2011.01219.x