Search Results

There are 3448 results for: content related to: Fear and guilt in proposers: Using emotions to explain offers in ultimatum bargaining

  1. Do Participants and Observers Assess Intentions Differently During Bargaining and Conflict?

    American Journal of Political Science

    Volume 53, Issue 4, October 2009, Pages: 910–930, Eric S. Dickson

    Version of Record online : 18 SEP 2009, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00408.x

  2. DO WEALTH DIFFERENCES AFFECT FAIRNESS CONSIDERATIONS?

    International Economic Review

    Volume 47, Issue 2, May 2006, Pages: 391–429, Olivier Armantier

    Version of Record online : 11 APR 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2354.2006.00383.x

  3. Asymmetric Information in Simple Bargaining Games: An Experimental Study

    German Economic Review

    Charlotte Klempt, Kerstin Pull and Manfred Stadler

    Version of Record online : 27 JUN 2017, DOI: 10.1111/geer.12138

  4. Blindfolded vs. Informed Ultimatum Bargaining – A Theoretical and Experimental Analysis

    German Economic Review

    Werner Güth, Kerstin Pull, Manfred Stadler and Alexandra K. Zaby

    Version of Record online : 26 JUL 2016, DOI: 10.1111/geer.12112

  5. Games: Ultimatum

    Standard Article

    Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science

    Terence C Burnham

    Published Online : 15 JAN 2006, DOI: 10.1002/0470018860.s00692

  6. Effort and Fairness in Bargaining Games

    Journal of Behavioral Decision Making

    Volume 26, Issue 1, January 2013, Pages: 79–90, Ana M. Franco-Watkins, Bryan D. Edwards and Roy E. Acuff Jr.

    Version of Record online : 25 OCT 2011, DOI: 10.1002/bdm.762

  7. Social Value Orientation Moderates the Effects of Intuition versus Reflection on Responses to Unfair Ultimatum Offers

    Journal of Behavioral Decision Making

    Volume 30, Issue 2, April 2017, Pages: 569–581, Maik Bieleke, Peter M. Gollwitzer, Gabriele Oettingen and Urs Fischbacher

    Version of Record online : 3 AUG 2016, DOI: 10.1002/bdm.1975

  8. Why humans deviate from rational choice

    Psychophysiology

    Volume 48, Issue 4, April 2011, Pages: 507–514, Johannes Hewig, Nora Kretschmer, Ralf H. Trippe, Holger Hecht, Michael G. H. Coles, Clay B. Holroyd and Wolfgang H. R. Miltner

    Version of Record online : 26 JUL 2010, DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01081.x

  9. Changes in Negative Reciprocity as a Function of Age

    Journal of Behavioral Decision Making

    Volume 26, Issue 4, October 2013, Pages: 397–403, Yoella Bereby-Meyer and Shelly Fiks

    Version of Record online : 22 AUG 2012, DOI: 10.1002/bdm.1768

  10. Inequality Aversion in a Variety of Games – An Indirect Evolutionary Analysis

    The Economic Journal

    Volume 116, Issue 514, October 2006, Pages: 1037–1056, Werner Güth and Stefan Napel

    Version of Record online : 12 OCT 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2006.01122.x

  11. Contra Private Fairness

    American Journal of Economics and Sociology

    Volume 71, Issue 2, April 2012, Pages: 407–435, BART J. WILSON

    Version of Record online : 4 APR 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1536-7150.2012.00836.x

  12. You have free access to this content
    Bargaining and trust: the effects of 36-h total sleep deprivation on socially interactive decisions

    Journal of Sleep Research

    Volume 19, Issue 1-Part-I, March 2010, Pages: 54–63, CLARE ANDERSON and DAVID L. DICKINSON

    Version of Record online : 14 OCT 2009, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2869.2009.00767.x

  13. Effects of a Management–Labor Context and Team Play on Ultimatum Game Outcomes

    Southern Economic Journal

    Volume 83, Issue 4, April 2017, Pages: 993–1011, Hal R. Arkes, John H. Kagel and Dimitry Mezhvinsky

    Version of Record online : 27 JAN 2017, DOI: 10.1002/soej.12187

  14. Smiling faces, sometimes they don't tell the truth: Facial expression in the ultimatum game impacts decision making and event-related potentials

    Psychophysiology

    Volume 51, Issue 4, April 2014, Pages: 358–363, Patrick Mussel, Johannes Hewig, John J. B. Allen, Michael G. H. Coles and Wolfgang Miltner

    Version of Record online : 24 FEB 2014, DOI: 10.1111/psyp.12184

  15. How to Model Heterogeneity in Costly Punishment: Insights from Responders' Response Times

    Journal of Behavioral Decision Making

    Volume 26, Issue 5, December 2013, Pages: 462–476, Urs Fischbacher, Ralph Hertwig and Adrian Bruhin

    Version of Record online : 24 JAN 2013, DOI: 10.1002/bdm.1779

  16. Children's and Adolescents’ Decisions about Sharing Money with Others

    Social Development

    Volume 18, Issue 3, August 2009, Pages: 711–727, Patrick J. Leman, Monika Keller, Masanori Takezawa and Michaela Gummerum

    Version of Record online : 26 MAY 2008, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00486.x

  17. Social Comparisons in Ultimatum Bargaining

    The Scandinavian Journal of Economics

    Volume 106, Issue 3, September 2004, Pages: 495–510, Iris Bohnet and Richard Zeckhauser

    Version of Record online : 24 NOV 2004, DOI: 10.1111/j.0347-0520.2004.00376.x

  18. Social Preferences and Competition

    Journal of Money, Credit and Banking

    Volume 43, Issue s1, August 2011, Pages: 207–231, KLAUS M. SCHMIDT

    Version of Record online : 20 JUL 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-4616.2011.00415.x

  19. NORMS MAKE PREFERENCES SOCIAL

    Journal of the European Economic Association

    Volume 14, Issue 3, June 2016, Pages: 608–638, Erik O. Kimbrough and Alexander Vostroknutov

    Version of Record online : 29 SEP 2015, DOI: 10.1111/jeea.12152

  20. Fair Procedures: Evidence from Games Involving Lotteries

    The Economic Journal

    Volume 115, Issue 506, October 2005, Pages: 1054–1076, Gary E Bolton, Jordi Brandts and Axel Ockenfels

    Version of Record online : 31 OCT 2005, DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2005.01032.x