Search Results

There are 5462 results for: content related to: Does Measuring Performance Lead to Better Performance?

  1. Citizen-Driven Performance Measurement: Opportunities for Evaluator Collaboration in Support of the New Governance

    New Directions for Evaluation

    Volume 2013, Issue 137, Spring 2013, Pages: 81–92, Patria de Lancer Julnes

    Version of Record online : 6 MAR 2013, DOI: 10.1002/ev.20048

  2. Perspectives on Knowledge Converted into Action

    Public Administration Review

    Volume 70, Issue 2, March/April 2010, Pages: 317–319, Frank Anechiarico and Dennis C. Smith

    Version of Record online : 11 FEB 2010, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02139.x

  3. Answers in Search of a Question

    Public Administration Review

    Volume 71, Issue 1, January/February 2011, Pages: 141–143, Daniel W. Williams

    Version of Record online : 18 JAN 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02322.x

  4. The Other Type of Performance Information: Nonroutine Feedback, Its Relevance and Use

    Public Administration Review

    Volume 73, Issue 2, March/April 2013, Pages: 265–276, Alexander Kroll

    Version of Record online : 25 JAN 2013, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02648.x

  5. Performance management in a benchmarking regime: Quebec's municipal management indicators

    Canadian Public Administration

    Volume 58, Issue 1, March 2015, Pages: 110–137, Étienne Charbonneau and François Bellavance

    Version of Record online : 20 APR 2015, DOI: 10.1111/capa.12098

  6. Accountability Unbound

    Public Administration Review

    Volume 72, Issue 4, July/August 2012, Pages: 615–622, Patria de Lancer Julnes

    Version of Record online : 22 MAY 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02611.x

  7. Determinants of Performance Measurement: An Investigation into the Decision to Conduct Citizen Surveys

    Public Administration Review

    Volume 68, Issue 5, September|October 2008, Pages: 891–907, Esteban G. Dalehite

    Version of Record online : 5 AUG 2008, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00930.x

  8. Managerial Effectiveness of Government Performance Measurement: Testing a Middle-Range Model

    Public Administration Review

    Volume 67, Issue 5, September|October 2007, Pages: 861–879, Kaifeng Yang and Jun Yi Hsieh

    Version of Record online : 19 SEP 2007, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00774.x

  9. PBB in American Local Governments: It's More than a Management Tool

    Public Administration Review

    Volume 71, Issue 3, May/June 2011, Pages: 391–401, Alfred Tat-Kei Ho

    Version of Record online : 9 MAY 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02359.x

  10. Use of Performance Information as an Organizational Routine in Management Control

    Performance Improvement

    Volume 52, Issue 10, November/December 2013, Pages: 28–36, Xuanhui Liu and Wouter Van Dooren

    Version of Record online : 18 NOV 2013, DOI: 10.1002/pfi.21379

  11. THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN RETRACTED: STRENGTHENING THE LINK BETWEEN PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT AND DECISION MAKING

    Public Administration

    Volume 89, Issue 3, September 2011, Pages: 860–878, JEANNETTE TAYLOR

    Version of Record online : 18 DEC 2009, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01802.x

  12. Does Performance Management Lead to Better Outcomes? Evidence from the U.S. Public Transit Industry

    Public Administration Review

    Volume 73, Issue 4, July/August 2013, Pages: 625–636, Theodore H. Poister, Obed Q. Pasha and Lauren Hamilton Edwards

    Version of Record online : 9 MAY 2013, DOI: 10.1111/puar.12076

  13. Strengthening Efforts to Engage the Hispanic Community in Citizen-Driven Governance: An Assessment of Efforts in Utah

    Public Administration Review

    Volume 71, Issue 2, March/April 2011, Pages: 221–231, Patria de Lancer Julnes and Derek Johnson

    Version of Record online : 1 MAR 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02333.x

  14. The Implementation and Use of Benchmarking in Local Government: A Case Study of the Translation of a Management Accounting Innovation

    Financial Accountability & Management

    Volume 30, Issue 2, May 2014, Pages: 121–149, Sven Siverbo

    Version of Record online : 3 APR 2014, DOI: 10.1111/faam.12031

  15. FACTORS INFLUENCING THE USE OF PERFORMANCE INFORMATION FOR DECISION MAKING IN AUSTRALIAN STATE AGENCIES

    Public Administration

    Volume 89, Issue 4, December 2011, Pages: 1316–1334, JEANNETTE TAYLOR

    Version of Record online : 6 OCT 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.02008.x

  16. ORGANIZATIONAL PATHWAYS TO COMPLIANT REFORM IMPLEMENTATION: EVIDENCE FROM MEXICAN CIVIL SERVICE REFORM

    Public Administration

    Volume 93, Issue 3, September 2015, Pages: 646–662, FERNANDO NIETO MORALES, RAFAEL WITTEK and LIESBET HEYSE

    Version of Record online : 26 FEB 2015, DOI: 10.1111/padm.12157

  17. THE PSM–LEADERSHIP FIT: A MODEL OF PERFORMANCE INFORMATION USE

    Public Administration

    Volume 92, Issue 4, December 2014, Pages: 974–991, ALEXANDER KROLL and DOMINIK VOGEL

    Version of Record online : 26 FEB 2013, DOI: 10.1111/padm.12014

  18. Joining public accountability and performance management: A case study of Lethbridge, Alberta

    Canadian Public Administration

    Volume 54, Issue 1, March 2011, Pages: 41–72, Richard Hildebrand and James C. McDavid

    Version of Record online : 21 MAR 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-7121.2011.00160.x

  19. Factors Influencing the Use of Performance Data to Improve Municipal Services: Evidence from the North Carolina Benchmarking Project

    Public Administration Review

    Volume 68, Issue 2, March|April 2008, Pages: 304–318, David N. Ammons and William C. Rivenbark

    Version of Record online : 8 FEB 2008, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00864.x

  20. Editors' notes: Current federal policies and controversies over methodology in evaluation

    New Directions for Evaluation

    Volume 2007, Issue 113, Spring 2007, Pages: 1–12, George Julnes and Debra J. Rog

    Version of Record online : 21 MAR 2007, DOI: 10.1002/ev.212