Search Results

There are 38632 results for: content related to: Inherently safer design–not only about reducing consequences!

  1. An overview of inherently safer design

    Process Safety Progress

    Volume 25, Issue 2, June 2006, Pages: 98–107, Dennis C. Hendershot

    Article first published online : 6 JAN 2006, DOI: 10.1002/prs.10121

  2. A real-life example of choosing an inherently safer process option

    Process Safety Progress

    Volume 25, Issue 4, December 2006, Pages: 274–279, Karen Study

    Article first published online : 17 OCT 2006, DOI: 10.1002/prs.10163

  3. Integrated inherent safety index (I2SI): A tool for inherent safety evaluation

    Process Safety Progress

    Volume 23, Issue 2, June 2004, Pages: 136–148, Faisal I. Khan and Paul R. Amyotte

    Article first published online : 29 JUN 2004, DOI: 10.1002/prs.10015

  4. A summary of inherently safer technology

    Process Safety Progress

    Volume 29, Issue 4, December 2010, Pages: 389–392, Dennis C. Hendershot

    Article first published online : 27 OCT 2010, DOI: 10.1002/prs.10395

  5. Implementing inherently safer design in an existing plant

    Process Safety Progress

    Volume 25, Issue 1, March 2006, Pages: 52–57, Dennis C. Hendershot, Jonathan A. Sussman, Gerald E. Winkler and G. Lee Dill

    Article first published online : 14 DEC 2005, DOI: 10.1002/prs.10117

  6. Key performance indicators for inherent safety: Application to the hydrogen supply chain

    Process Safety Progress

    Volume 28, Issue 2, June 2009, Pages: 156–170, Alessandro Tugnoli, Gabriele Landucci and Valerio Cozzani

    Article first published online : 13 APR 2009, DOI: 10.1002/prs.10303

  7. Applying the ‘Limitation of effects’ inherently safer processing strategy when siting and designing facilities

    Process Safety Progress

    Volume 27, Issue 2, June 2008, Pages: 121–130, David G. Clark

    Article first published online : 26 NOV 2007, DOI: 10.1002/prs.10240

  8. A model for estimating the probability of missile impact: Missiles originating from bursting horizontal cylindrical vessels

    Process Safety Progress

    Volume 26, Issue 2, June 2007, Pages: 129–139, Ravi Pula, Faisal I. Khan, Brian Veitch and Paul R. Amyotte

    Article first published online : 10 NOV 2006, DOI: 10.1002/prs.10178

  9. An analysis of CSB investigation reports concerning the hierarchy of controls

    Process Safety Progress

    Volume 30, Issue 3, September 2011, Pages: 261–265, Paul R. Amyotte, Dustin K. MacDonald and Faisal I. Khan

    Article first published online : 20 JUN 2011, DOI: 10.1002/prs.10461

  10. Is our apparatus foolproof?: Examination of safety-important characteristics of an electrostatic discharge tester for explosives

    Process Safety Progress

    Volume 32, Issue 3, September 2013, Pages: 283–297, Milos Ferjencik, Vojtech Pelikan and Simon Cousy

    Article first published online : 15 MAR 2013, DOI: 10.1002/prs.11573

  11. Baseline risk assessment tool: A comprehensive risk management tool for process safety

    Process Safety Progress

    Volume 30, Issue 3, September 2011, Pages: 251–260, Paolo Cherubin, Stefano Pellino and Annamaria Petrone

    Article first published online : 14 JUL 2011, DOI: 10.1002/prs.10464

  12. The Buncefield explosion: Were the resulting overpressures really unforeseeable?

    Process Safety Progress

    Volume 31, Issue 1, March 2012, Pages: 55–71, Jérôme Taveau

    Article first published online : 14 JUL 2011, DOI: 10.1002/prs.10468

  13. Analyzing hazards of sour water spills

    Process Safety Progress

    Volume 26, Issue 4, December 2007, Pages: 315–323, J.L. Woodward

    Article first published online : 25 SEP 2007, DOI: 10.1002/prs.10222

  14. A fuzzy clustering–ranking algorithm and its application for alarm operating optimization in chemical processing

    Process Safety Progress

    Volume 24, Issue 1, March 2005, Pages: 66–75, Zhiqiang Geng, Qunxiong Zhu and Xiangbai Gu

    Article first published online : 18 JAN 2005, DOI: 10.1002/prs.10060

  15. Minimum amount of flammable gas for explosion within a confined space

    Process Safety Progress

    Volume 23, Issue 4, December 2004, Pages: 321–329, Young-Do Jo and Kyo-Shik Park

    Article first published online : 17 NOV 2004, DOI: 10.1002/prs.10042

  16. Thrust force calculations for pressure safety valves

    Process Safety Progress

    Volume 25, Issue 3, September 2006, Pages: 203–213, Robert D'Alessandro P.E.

    Article first published online : 12 MAY 2006, DOI: 10.1002/prs.10138

  17. Identification of kinetic models for the assessment of reaction hazards

    Process Safety Progress

    Volume 26, Issue 3, September 2007, Pages: 209–220, A. Kossoy and Yu Akhmetshin

    Article first published online : 30 JAN 2007, DOI: 10.1002/prs.10189

  18. What to do when nothing has happened?

    Process Safety Progress

    Volume 30, Issue 3, September 2011, Pages: 204–211, Raymond “Randy” Freeman

    Article first published online : 28 JUN 2011, DOI: 10.1002/prs.10463

  19. Revisiting DIERS' two-phase methodology for reactive systems twenty years later

    Process Safety Progress

    Volume 25, Issue 3, September 2006, Pages: 180–188, Hans K. Fauske

    Article first published online : 26 APR 2006, DOI: 10.1002/prs.10133

  20. Sizing of throttling device for gas/liquid two-phase flow part 1: Safety valves

    Process Safety Progress

    Volume 23, Issue 4, December 2004, Pages: 335–344, Ralf Diener and Jürgen Schmidt

    Article first published online : 29 NOV 2004, DOI: 10.1002/prs.10034