Search Results

There are 16516 results for: content related to: International comparison on the application of societal risk criteria

  1. You have free access to this content
    Appendix B: Survey of Worldwide Risk Criteria Applications

    Guidelines for Developing Quantitative Safety Risk Criteria

    , Pages: 119–169, 2009

    Published Online : 8 SEP 2009, DOI: 10.1002/9780470552940.app2

  2. Learning From Regulatory Precedents

    Guidelines for Developing Quantitative Safety Risk Criteria

    , Pages: 49–78, 2009

    Published Online : 8 SEP 2009, DOI: 10.1002/9780470552940.ch3

  3. Fundamental Concepts of Risk Assessment and Risk Criteria

    Guidelines for Developing Quantitative Safety Risk Criteria

    , Pages: 11–48, 2009

    Published Online : 8 SEP 2009, DOI: 10.1002/9780470552940.ch2

  4. You have free access to this content
    Appendix C: Development of Company Risk Criteria

    Guidelines for Developing Quantitative Safety Risk Criteria

    , Pages: 171–190, 2009

    Published Online : 8 SEP 2009, DOI: 10.1002/9780470552940.app3

  5. Considerations in Developing Risk Criteria

    Guidelines for Developing Quantitative Safety Risk Criteria

    , Pages: 79–103, 2009

    Published Online : 8 SEP 2009, DOI: 10.1002/9780470552940.ch4

  6. You have free access to this content
    Front Matter

    Guidelines for Developing Quantitative Safety Risk Criteria

    , Pages: i–xxxv, 2009

    Published Online : 8 SEP 2009, DOI: 10.1002/9780470552940.fmatter

  7. Challenges in developing and implementing safety risk tolerance criteria

    Process Safety Progress

    Volume 30, Issue 3, September 2011, Pages: 232–239, Walt Frank P.E.

    Version of Record online : 2 MAY 2011, DOI: 10.1002/prs.10452

  8. Risk tolerance criteria for layers of protection analysis

    Process Safety Progress

    Volume 31, Issue 2, June 2012, Pages: 118–121, Paul Baybutt

    Version of Record online : 12 DEC 2011, DOI: 10.1002/prs.10507

  9. Choosing appropriate quantitative safety risk criteria: Applications from the new CCPS guidelines

    Process Safety Progress

    Volume 29, Issue 4, December 2010, Pages: 293–298, Walt Frank and Dave Jones

    Version of Record online : 23 SEP 2010, DOI: 10.1002/prs.10404

  10. You have free access to this content
    References

    Guidelines for Developing Quantitative Safety Risk Criteria

    , Pages: 191–205, 2009

    Published Online : 8 SEP 2009, DOI: 10.1002/9780470552940.refs

  11. Understanding and developing quantitative risk criteria

    Process Safety Progress

    Volume 31, Issue 4, December 2012, Pages: 369–372, Jatin N. Shah and Michael D. Moosemiller

    Version of Record online : 6 NOV 2012, DOI: 10.1002/prs.11533

  12. Risk tolerance criteria and the IEC 61511/ISA 84 standard on safety instrumented systems

    Process Safety Progress

    Volume 32, Issue 3, September 2013, Pages: 307–310, Paul Baybutt

    Version of Record online : 8 FEB 2013, DOI: 10.1002/prs.11554

  13. The Story of Quantified Risk and its Place in Slope Safety Policy in Hong Kong

    Landslide Hazard and Risk

    Thomas Glade, Malcolm Anderson, Michael J. Crozier, Pages: 643–674, 2012

    Published Online : 10 APR 2012, DOI: 10.1002/9780470012659.ch22

  14. You have free access to this content
    Appendix A: Understanding and Using F-N Diagrams

    Guidelines for Developing Quantitative Safety Risk Criteria

    , Pages: 109–117, 2009

    Published Online : 8 SEP 2009, DOI: 10.1002/9780470552940.app1

  15. Risk criteria, protection layers, and conditional modifiers

    Process Safety Progress

    Volume 31, Issue 2, June 2012, Pages: 139–144, Angela E. Summers and William H. Hearn

    Version of Record online : 17 FEB 2012, DOI: 10.1002/prs.11478

  16. Analytical Methods in Process Safety Management and System Safety Engineering – Layers of Protection Analysis

    Handbook of Loss Prevention Engineering, Volume 1&2

    Joel M. Haight, Pages: 593–635, 2013

    Published Online : 20 FEB 2013, DOI: 10.1002/9783527650644.ch23

  17. Risk Criteria for the Shipping Industry

    Quality and Reliability Engineering International

    Volume 22, Issue 1, February 2006, Pages: 31–40, V. M. Trbojevic

    Version of Record online : 24 JAN 2006, DOI: 10.1002/qre.746

  18. The development of risk criteria for high severity low frequency events

    Process Safety Progress

    Volume 28, Issue 1, March 2009, Pages: 11–14, Fred Henselwood and K. Gerry Phillips

    Version of Record online : 31 DEC 2008, DOI: 10.1002/prs.10279

  19. Beyond HAZOP and LOPA: Four different company approaches

    Process Safety Progress

    Jerry Wayne Chastain, Paul Delanoy, Chris Devlin, Thomas Mueller and Karen Study

    Version of Record online : 21 JUN 2016, DOI: 10.1002/prs.11831

  20. Deriving major accident failure frequencies with a storybuilder analysis of reportable accidents

    Process Safety Progress

    Volume 31, Issue 4, December 2012, Pages: 381–389, Henk Jan Manuel, Eelke S. Kooi, Linda J. Bellamy, Martijn L. Mud and Joy I. H. Oh

    Version of Record online : 29 OCT 2012, DOI: 10.1002/prs.11527