Search Results

There are 42110 results for: content related to: The impact of collaboration on the outcomes of scientific argumentation

  1. Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Scientific Argumentation: The Impact of Professional Development on K–12 Teachers

    Science Education

    Volume 97, Issue 6, November 2013, Pages: 936–972, KATHERINE L. McNEILL and AMANDA M. KNIGHT

    Version of Record online : 10 OCT 2013, DOI: 10.1002/sce.21081

  2. You have free access to this content
    Conceptualizations of argumentation from science studies and the learning sciences and their implications for the practices of science education

    Science Education

    Volume 92, Issue 3, May 2008, Pages: 473–498, Leah A. Bricker and Philip Bell

    Version of Record online : 17 MAR 2008, DOI: 10.1002/sce.20278

  3. Classroom communities' adaptations of the practice of scientific argumentation

    Science Education

    Volume 95, Issue 2, March 2011, Pages: 191–216, Leema K. Berland and Brian J. Reiser

    Version of Record online : 1 OCT 2010, DOI: 10.1002/sce.20420

  4. A learning progression for scientific argumentation: Understanding student work and designing supportive instructional contexts

    Science Education

    Volume 94, Issue 5, September 2010, Pages: 765–793, Leema K. Berland and Katherine L. McNeill

    Version of Record online : 4 MAY 2010, DOI: 10.1002/sce.20402

  5. The effect of a graph-oriented computer-assisted project-based learning environment on argumentation skills

    Journal of Computer Assisted Learning

    Volume 31, Issue 1, February 2015, Pages: 32–58, P.-S. Hsu, M. Van Dyke, Y. Chen and T.J. Smith

    Version of Record online : 20 OCT 2014, DOI: 10.1111/jcal.12080

  6. Science teachers and scientific argumentation: Trends in views and practice

    Journal of Research in Science Teaching

    Volume 49, Issue 9, November 2012, Pages: 1122–1148, Victor Sampson and Margaret R. Blanchard

    Version of Record online : 24 AUG 2012, DOI: 10.1002/tea.21037

  7. Implementation of Web-based argumentation in facilitating elementary school students to learn environmental issues

    Journal of Computer Assisted Learning

    Volume 30, Issue 5, October 2014, Pages: 479–496, T.H. Wang

    Version of Record online : 14 APR 2014, DOI: 10.1111/jcal.12061

  8. Exploring young students' collaborative argumentation within a socioscientific issue

    Journal of Research in Science Teaching

    Volume 50, Issue 2, February 2013, Pages: 209–237, Maria Evagorou and Jonathan Osborne

    Version of Record online : 10 JAN 2013, DOI: 10.1002/tea.21076

  9. Argument-Driven Inquiry as a way to help students learn how to participate in scientific argumentation and craft written arguments: An exploratory study

    Science Education

    Volume 95, Issue 2, March 2011, Pages: 217–257, Victor Sampson, Jonathon Grooms and Joi Phelps Walker

    Version of Record online : 11 OCT 2010, DOI: 10.1002/sce.20421

  10. You have free access to this content
    Framing for scientific argumentation

    Journal of Research in Science Teaching

    Volume 49, Issue 1, January 2012, Pages: 68–94, Leema K. Berland and David Hammer

    Version of Record online : 28 OCT 2011, DOI: 10.1002/tea.20446

  11. Improvements to elementary children's epistemic understanding from sustained argumentation

    Science Education

    Volume 96, Issue 3, May 2012, Pages: 488–526, Suna Ryu and William A. Sandoval

    Version of Record online : 12 APR 2012, DOI: 10.1002/sce.21006

  12. Relationship between nature of science understandings and argumentation skills: A role for counterargument and contextual factors

    Journal of Research in Science Teaching

    Volume 49, Issue 4, April 2012, Pages: 489–514, Rola Khishfe

    Version of Record online : 22 FEB 2012, DOI: 10.1002/tea.21012

  13. An Infrastructure for Argumentative Agents

    Computational Intelligence

    Volume 31, Issue 3, August 2015, Pages: 418–441, Jaume Jordán, Stella Heras, Soledad Valero and Vicente Julián

    Version of Record online : 24 JAN 2014, DOI: 10.1111/coin.12030

  14. You have free access to this content
    The Effect of Argumentative Task Goal on the Quality of Argumentative Discourse

    Science Education

    Volume 97, Issue 4, July 2013, Pages: 497–523, MERCE GARCIA-MILA, SANDRA GILABERT, SIBEL ERDURAN and MARK FELTON

    Version of Record online : 14 JUN 2013, DOI: 10.1002/sce.21057

  15. Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science

    Journal of Research in Science Teaching

    Volume 41, Issue 10, December 2004, Pages: 994–1020, Jonathan Osborne, Sibel Erduran and Shirley Simon

    Version of Record online : 2 NOV 2004, DOI: 10.1002/tea.20035

  16. Investor Reaction to the Ambiguity and Mix of Positive and Negative Argumentation in Favorable Analyst Reports

    Contemporary Accounting Research

    Volume 32, Issue 3, Fall 2015, Pages: 973–999, Jennifer Winchel

    Version of Record online : 7 FEB 2015, DOI: 10.1111/1911-3846.12108

  17. Scaffolding online argumentation during problem solving

    Journal of Computer Assisted Learning

    Volume 23, Issue 2, April 2007, Pages: 95–110, S. Oh and D.H. Jonassen

    Version of Record online : 12 JAN 2007, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00206.x

  18. Assessing dialogic argumentation in online environments to relate structure, grounds, and conceptual quality

    Journal of Research in Science Teaching

    Volume 45, Issue 3, March 2008, Pages: 293–321, Douglas B. Clark and Victor Sampson

    Version of Record online : 5 DEC 2007, DOI: 10.1002/tea.20216

  19. Developing an analytical framework for argumentation on energy consumption issues

    Journal of Research in Science Teaching

    Volume 52, Issue 8, October 2015, Pages: 1132–1162, Hui Jin, Cathy E. Mehl and Deborah H. Lan

    Version of Record online : 2 MAY 2015, DOI: 10.1002/tea.21237

  20. The Organizational Setting, Use and Institutionalization of Argumentation Repertoires

    Journal of Management Studies

    Volume 36, Issue 6, November 1999, Pages: 795–830, John A.A. Sillince

    Version of Record online : 16 DEC 2002, DOI: 10.1111/1467-6486.00159