Search Results

There are 5325719 results for: content related to: Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples

  1. Goodness-of-fit diagnostics for the propensity score model when estimating treatment effects using covariate adjustment with the propensity score

    Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety

    Volume 17, Issue 12, December 2008, Pages: 1202–1217, Peter C. Austin

    Version of Record online : 29 OCT 2008, DOI: 10.1002/pds.1673

  2. You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article
    A comparison of 12 algorithms for matching on the propensity score

    Statistics in Medicine

    Volume 33, Issue 6, 15 March 2014, Pages: 1057–1069, Peter C. Austin

    Version of Record online : 7 OCT 2013, DOI: 10.1002/sim.6004

  3. Assessing balance in measured baseline covariates when using many-to-one matching on the propensity-score

    Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety

    Volume 17, Issue 12, December 2008, Pages: 1218–1225, Peter C. Austin

    Version of Record online : 29 OCT 2008, DOI: 10.1002/pds.1674

  4. You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article
    Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies

    Statistics in Medicine

    Volume 34, Issue 28, 10 December 2015, Pages: 3661–3679, Peter C. Austin and Elizabeth A. Stuart

    Version of Record online : 3 AUG 2015, DOI: 10.1002/sim.6607

  5. A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003

    Statistics in Medicine

    Volume 27, Issue 12, 30 May 2008, Pages: 2037–2049, Peter C. Austin

    Version of Record online : 23 NOV 2007, DOI: 10.1002/sim.3150

  6. You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article
    The performance of different propensity-score methods for estimating differences in proportions (risk differences or absolute risk reductions) in observational studies

    Statistics in Medicine

    Volume 29, Issue 20, 10 September 2010, Pages: 2137–2148, Peter C. Austin

    Version of Record online : 27 JAN 2010, DOI: 10.1002/sim.3854

  7. You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article
    The use of propensity score methods with survival or time-to-event outcomes: reporting measures of effect similar to those used in randomized experiments

    Statistics in Medicine

    Volume 33, Issue 7, 30 March 2014, Pages: 1242–1258, Peter C. Austin

    Version of Record online : 30 SEP 2013, DOI: 10.1002/sim.5984

  8. Some Methods of Propensity-Score Matching had Superior Performance to Others: Results of an Empirical Investigation and Monte Carlo simulations

    Biometrical Journal

    Volume 51, Issue 1, February 2009, Pages: 171–184, Peter C. Austin

    Version of Record online : 5 FEB 2009, DOI: 10.1002/bimj.200810488

  9. You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article
    Comparing paired vs non-paired statistical methods of analyses when making inferences about absolute risk reductions in propensity-score matched samples

    Statistics in Medicine

    Volume 30, Issue 11, 20 May 2011, Pages: 1292–1301, Peter C. Austin

    Version of Record online : 21 FEB 2011, DOI: 10.1002/sim.4200

  10. The concept of the marginally matched subject in propensity-score matched analyses

    Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety

    Volume 18, Issue 6, June 2009, Pages: 469–482, Peter C. Austin and Douglas S. Lee

    Version of Record online : 24 MAR 2009, DOI: 10.1002/pds.1733

  11. You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article
    The use of bootstrapping when using propensity-score matching without replacement: a simulation study

    Statistics in Medicine

    Volume 33, Issue 24, 30 October 2014, Pages: 4306–4319, Peter C. Austin and Dylan S. Small

    Version of Record online : 4 AUG 2014, DOI: 10.1002/sim.6276

  12. You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article
    Optimal caliper widths for propensity-score matching when estimating differences in means and differences in proportions in observational studies

    Pharmaceutical Statistics

    Volume 10, Issue 2, March/April 2011, Pages: 150–161, Peter C. Austin

    Version of Record online : 27 APR 2010, DOI: 10.1002/pst.433

  13. Discussion of ‘A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003’

    Statistics in Medicine

    Volume 27, Issue 12, 30 May 2008, Pages: 2066–2069, Peter C. Austin

    Version of Record online : 20 MAR 2008, DOI: 10.1002/sim.3243

  14. The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal odds ratios

    Statistics in Medicine

    Volume 26, Issue 16, 20 July 2007, Pages: 3078–3094, Peter C. Austin

    Version of Record online : 22 DEC 2006, DOI: 10.1002/sim.2781

  15. You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article
    Optimal full matching for survival outcomes: a method that merits more widespread use

    Statistics in Medicine

    Volume 34, Issue 30, 30 December 2015, Pages: 3949–3967, Peter C. Austin and Elizabeth A. Stuart

    Version of Record online : 6 AUG 2015, DOI: 10.1002/sim.6602

  16. You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article
    The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal hazard ratios

    Statistics in Medicine

    Volume 32, Issue 16, 20 July 2013, Pages: 2837–2849, Peter C. Austin

    Version of Record online : 12 DEC 2012, DOI: 10.1002/sim.5705

  17. A comparison of the ability of different propensity score models to balance measured variables between treated and untreated subjects: a Monte Carlo study

    Statistics in Medicine

    Volume 26, Issue 4, 20 February 2007, Pages: 734–753, Peter C. Austin, Paul Grootendorst and Geoffrey M. Anderson

    Version of Record online : 17 MAY 2006, DOI: 10.1002/sim.2580

  18. A comparison of propensity score methods: a case-study estimating the effectiveness of post-AMI statin use

    Statistics in Medicine

    Volume 25, Issue 12, 30 June 2006, Pages: 2084–2106, Peter C. Austin and Muhammad M. Mamdani

    Version of Record online : 11 OCT 2005, DOI: 10.1002/sim.2328

  19. Critical appraisal of the application of propensity score methods in the urology literature

    BJU International

    Madhur Nayan, Robert J. Hamilton, David N. Juurlink, Antonio Finelli, Girish S. Kulkarni and Peter C. Austin

    Version of Record online : 7 JUL 2017, DOI: 10.1111/bju.13930

  20. Using balance statistics to determine the optimal number of controls in matching studies

    Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice

    Volume 19, Issue 5, October 2013, Pages: 968–975, Ariel Linden and Steven J. Samuels

    Version of Record online : 3 AUG 2013, DOI: 10.1111/jep.12072