Search Results

There are 36787 results for: content related to: The performance of different propensity-score methods for estimating differences in proportions (risk differences or absolute risk reductions) in observational studies

  1. The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal odds ratios

    Statistics in Medicine

    Volume 26, Issue 16, 20 July 2007, Pages: 3078–3094, Peter C. Austin

    Version of Record online : 22 DEC 2006, DOI: 10.1002/sim.2781

  2. You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article
    The use of propensity score methods with survival or time-to-event outcomes: reporting measures of effect similar to those used in randomized experiments

    Statistics in Medicine

    Volume 33, Issue 7, 30 March 2014, Pages: 1242–1258, Peter C. Austin

    Version of Record online : 30 SEP 2013, DOI: 10.1002/sim.5984

  3. You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article
    Comparing paired vs non-paired statistical methods of analyses when making inferences about absolute risk reductions in propensity-score matched samples

    Statistics in Medicine

    Volume 30, Issue 11, 20 May 2011, Pages: 1292–1301, Peter C. Austin

    Version of Record online : 21 FEB 2011, DOI: 10.1002/sim.4200

  4. You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article
    The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal hazard ratios

    Statistics in Medicine

    Volume 32, Issue 16, 20 July 2013, Pages: 2837–2849, Peter C. Austin

    Version of Record online : 12 DEC 2012, DOI: 10.1002/sim.5705

  5. Goodness-of-fit diagnostics for the propensity score model when estimating treatment effects using covariate adjustment with the propensity score

    Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety

    Volume 17, Issue 12, December 2008, Pages: 1202–1217, Peter C. Austin

    Version of Record online : 29 OCT 2008, DOI: 10.1002/pds.1673

  6. You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article
    A comparison of 12 algorithms for matching on the propensity score

    Statistics in Medicine

    Volume 33, Issue 6, 15 March 2014, Pages: 1057–1069, Peter C. Austin

    Version of Record online : 7 OCT 2013, DOI: 10.1002/sim.6004

  7. Conditioning on the propensity score can result in biased estimation of common measures of treatment effect: a Monte Carlo study

    Statistics in Medicine

    Volume 26, Issue 4, 20 February 2007, Pages: 754–768, Peter C. Austin, Paul Grootendorst, Sharon-Lise T. Normand and Geoffrey M. Anderson

    Version of Record online : 16 JUN 2006, DOI: 10.1002/sim.2618

  8. A comparison of propensity score methods: a case-study estimating the effectiveness of post-AMI statin use

    Statistics in Medicine

    Volume 25, Issue 12, 30 June 2006, Pages: 2084–2106, Peter C. Austin and Muhammad M. Mamdani

    Version of Record online : 11 OCT 2005, DOI: 10.1002/sim.2328

  9. You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article
    Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies

    Statistics in Medicine

    Volume 34, Issue 28, 10 December 2015, Pages: 3661–3679, Peter C. Austin and Elizabeth A. Stuart

    Version of Record online : 3 AUG 2015, DOI: 10.1002/sim.6607

  10. You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article
    The use of bootstrapping when using propensity-score matching without replacement: a simulation study

    Statistics in Medicine

    Volume 33, Issue 24, 30 October 2014, Pages: 4306–4319, Peter C. Austin and Dylan S. Small

    Version of Record online : 4 AUG 2014, DOI: 10.1002/sim.6276

  11. You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article
    Optimal caliper widths for propensity-score matching when estimating differences in means and differences in proportions in observational studies

    Pharmaceutical Statistics

    Volume 10, Issue 2, March/April 2011, Pages: 150–161, Peter C. Austin

    Version of Record online : 27 APR 2010, DOI: 10.1002/pst.433

  12. Inverse probability weighted estimation of the marginal odds ratio

    Statistics in Medicine

    Volume 27, Issue 26, 20 November 2008, Pages: 5560–5563, Peter C. Austin

    Version of Record online : 3 SEP 2008, DOI: 10.1002/sim.3385

  13. A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003

    Statistics in Medicine

    Volume 27, Issue 12, 30 May 2008, Pages: 2037–2049, Peter C. Austin

    Version of Record online : 23 NOV 2007, DOI: 10.1002/sim.3150

  14. You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article
    Optimal full matching for survival outcomes: a method that merits more widespread use

    Statistics in Medicine

    Volume 34, Issue 30, 30 December 2015, Pages: 3949–3967, Peter C. Austin and Elizabeth A. Stuart

    Version of Record online : 6 AUG 2015, DOI: 10.1002/sim.6602

  15. Discussion of ‘A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003’

    Statistics in Medicine

    Volume 27, Issue 12, 30 May 2008, Pages: 2066–2069, Peter C. Austin

    Version of Record online : 20 MAR 2008, DOI: 10.1002/sim.3243

  16. The use of the propensity score for estimating treatment effects: administrative versus clinical data

    Statistics in Medicine

    Volume 24, Issue 10, 30 May 2005, Pages: 1563–1578, Peter C. Austin, Muhammad M. Mamdani, Therese A. Stukel, Geoffrey M. Anderson and Jack V. Tu

    Version of Record online : 11 FEB 2005, DOI: 10.1002/sim.2053

  17. The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal odds ratios, Statistics in Medicine 2007; 26:3078–3094

    Statistics in Medicine

    Volume 27, Issue 19, 30 August 2008, Pages: 3918–3920, Peter C. Austin

    Version of Record online : 1 APR 2008, DOI: 10.1002/sim.3276

  18. Critical appraisal of the application of propensity score methods in the urology literature

    BJU International

    Volume 120, Issue 6, December 2017, Pages: 873–880, Madhur Nayan, Robert J. Hamilton, David N. Juurlink, Antonio Finelli, Girish S. Kulkarni and Peter C. Austin

    Version of Record online : 7 JUL 2017, DOI: 10.1111/bju.13930

  19. Confounder-adjusted estimates of the risk difference using propensity score-based weighting

    Statistics in Medicine

    Volume 29, Issue 30, 30 December 2010, Pages: 3126–3136, Obioha C. Ukoumunne, Elizabeth Williamson, Andrew B. Forbes, Martin C. Gulliford and John B. Carlin

    Version of Record online : 16 DEC 2010, DOI: 10.1002/sim.3935

  20. Generalized propensity score for estimating the average treatment effect of multiple treatments

    Statistics in Medicine

    Volume 31, Issue 7, 30 March 2012, Pages: 681–697, Ping Feng, Xiao-Hua Zhou, Qing-Ming Zou, Ming-Yu Fan and Xiao-Song Li

    Version of Record online : 24 FEB 2011, DOI: 10.1002/sim.4168