Search Results

There are 14908 results for: content related to: Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Mamography Is Improved In Younger Women

  1. You have full text access to this Open Access content
    Cost and cost-effectiveness of digital mammography compared with film-screen mammography in Australia

    Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health

    Volume 33, Issue 5, October 2009, Pages: 430–436, Shuhong Wang, Tracy Merlin, Florian Kreisz, Paul Craft and Janet E. Hiller

    Version of Record online : 6 OCT 2009, DOI: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2009.00424.x

  2. Mammography

    Standard Article

    Wiley Encyclopedia of Biomedical Engineering

    Kwan-Hoong Ng and Noriah Jamal

    Published Online : 14 APR 2006, DOI: 10.1002/9780471740360.ebs1348

  3. You have free access to this content
    Breast cancer imaging: A perspective for the next decade

    Medical Physics

    Volume 35, Issue 11, November 2008, Pages: 4878–4897, Andrew Karellas and Srinivasan Vedantham

    Version of Record online : 30 NOV 2016, DOI: 10.1118/1.2986144

  4. Comparison of radiation exposure and associated radiation-induced cancer risks from mammography and molecular imaging of the breast

    Medical Physics

    Volume 37, Issue 12, December 2010, Pages: 6187–6198, Michael K. O'Connor, Hua Li, Deborah J. Rhodes, Carrie B. Hruska, Conor B. Clancy and Richard J. Vetter

    Version of Record online : 10 NOV 2010, DOI: 10.1118/1.3512759

  5. Breast density measurements with ultrasound tomography: A comparison with film and digital mammography

    Medical Physics

    Volume 40, Issue 1, January 2013, Neb Duric, Norman Boyd, Peter Littrup, Mark Sak, Lukasz Myc, Cuiping Li, Erik West, Sal Minkin, Lisa Martin, Martin Yaffe, Steven Schmidt, Muhammad Faiz, Jason Shen, Olga Melnichouk, Qing Li and Teri Albrecht

    Version of Record online : 2 JAN 2013, DOI: 10.1118/1.4772057

  6. Status of Mammography after the Digital Mammography Imaging Screening Trial: Digital versus Film

    The Breast Journal

    Volume 12, Issue 2, March 2006, Pages: 99–102, D. David Dershaw

    Version of Record online : 24 FEB 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1075-122X.2006.00216.x

  7. Solid-state dosimeters: A new approach for mammography measurements

    Medical Physics

    Volume 42, Issue 2, February 2015, Pages: 542–557, Libby F. Brateman and Philip H. Heintz

    Version of Record online : 30 NOV 2016, DOI: 10.1118/1.4903263

  8. The adverse implications of the transition from film to digital mammography for performing surveillance in patients with a history of breast cancer or significant risk factors for the disease

    Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology

    Volume 7, Issue 4, December 2011, Pages: 364–368, Rachel L WARD, David SPEAKMAN and Michael A HENDERSON

    Version of Record online : 8 DEC 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-7563.2011.01436.x

  9. You have free access to this content
    Changes in the availability of screening mammography, 2000–2010


    Volume 119, Issue 21, 1 November 2013, Pages: 3847–3853, Elena B. Elkin, Coral L. Atoria, Nicole Leoce, Peter B. Bach and Deborah Schrag

    Version of Record online : 13 AUG 2013, DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28305

  10. You have free access to this content
    Do nonattenders in mammography screening programmes seek mammography elsewhere?

    International Journal of Cancer

    Volume 113, Issue 3, 20 January 2005, Pages: 464–470, Allan Jensen, Anne Helene Olsen, My von Euler-Chelpin, Sisse Helle Njor, Ilse Vejborg and Elsebeth Lynge

    Version of Record online : 28 SEP 2004, DOI: 10.1002/ijc.20604

  11. Timing the Use of Breast Cancer Risk Information in Biopsy Decision-Making

    Production and Operations Management

    Volume 26, Issue 7, July 2017, Pages: 1333–1358, Mehmet Ulvi Saygi Ayvaci, Mehmet Eren Ahsen, Srinivasan Raghunathan and Zahra Gharibi

    Version of Record online : 23 FEB 2017, DOI: 10.1111/poms.12679

  12. You have free access to this content
    American Cancer Society Guidelines for Breast Cancer Screening: Update 2003

    CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians

    Volume 53, Issue 3, May/June 2003, Pages: 141–169, Dr. Robert A. Smith, Dr. Debbie Saslow, Kimberly Andrews Sawyer, Dr. Wylie Burke, Dr. Mary E. Costanza, Dr. W. Phil Evans III, Dr. Roger S. Foster Jr., Dr. Edward Hendrick, Dr. Harmon J. Eyre and Ms., Dr. Steven Sener

    Version of Record online : 31 DEC 2008, DOI: 10.3322/canjclin.53.3.141

  13. Cost-Effectiveness of Increasing Access to Mammography Through Mobile Mammography for Older Women

    Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

    Volume 57, Issue 2, February 2009, Pages: 285–290, Arash Naeim, Emmett Keeler, Lawrence W. Bassett, Jay Parikh, Roshan Bastani and David B. Reuben

    Version of Record online : 11 DEC 2008, DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.02105.x

  14. Mammographic Screening for Breast Cancer: 2010

    Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine: A Journal of Translational and Personalized Medicine

    Volume 77, Issue 4, July/August 2010, Pages: 398–404, Laurie Margolies

    Version of Record online : 15 JUL 2010, DOI: 10.1002/msj.20194

  15. Estimation of breast percent density in raw and processed full field digital mammography images via adaptive fuzzy c-means clustering and support vector machine segmentation

    Medical Physics

    Volume 39, Issue 8, August 2012, Pages: 4903–4917, Brad M. Keller, Diane L. Nathan, Yan Wang, Yuanjie Zheng, James C. Gee, Emily F. Conant and Despina Kontos

    Version of Record online : 25 JUL 2012, DOI: 10.1118/1.4736530

  16. You have free access to this content
    Film mammography for breast cancer screening in younger women is no longer appropriate because of the demonstrated superiority of digital mammography for this age group

    Medical Physics

    Volume 33, Issue 11, November 2006, Pages: 3979–3982, Martin J. Yaffe, Gary T. Barnes and Colin G. Orton

    Version of Record online : 30 NOV 2016, DOI: 10.1118/1.2218313

  17. Applicability of ACR breast dosimetry methodology to a digital mammography system

    Medical Physics

    Volume 33, Issue 3, March 2006, Pages: 799–807, John J. Tomon, Thomas E. Johnson, Kristin N. Swenson and David A. Schauer

    Version of Record online : 30 NOV 2016, DOI: 10.1118/1.2168064

  18. You have free access to this content
    Mammography screening in African American women


    Volume 97, Issue S1, 1 January 2003, Pages: 258–272, Beth A. Jones, Elizabeth A. Patterson and Lisa Calvocoressi

    Version of Record online : 18 DEC 2002, DOI: 10.1002/cncr.11022

  19. A population-based tissue probability map-driven level set method for fully automated mammographic density estimations

    Medical Physics

    Volume 41, Issue 7, July 2014, Youngwoo Kim, Byung Woo Hong, Seung Ja Kim and Jong Hyo Kim

    Version of Record online : 30 NOV 2016, DOI: 10.1118/1.4881525

  20. Scientific Abstracts and Sessions

    Medical Physics

    Volume 44, Issue 6, June 2017, Pages: 2721–3318,

    Version of Record online : 14 JUN 2017, DOI: 10.1002/mp.12304