Search Results

There are 23275 results for: content related to: Adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix compared with squamous cell carcinoma: a 12-year study in Southampton and South-west Hampshire

  1. You have free access to this content
    Invasive cervical cancer audit: why cancers developed in a high-risk population with an organised screening programme

    BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology

    Volume 117, Issue 6, May 2010, Pages: 736–745, A Herbert,   Anshu, G Culora, H Dunsmore, SS Gupta, G Holdsworth, AA Kubba, E McLean, J Sim and KS Raju

    Version of Record online : 25 FEB 2010, DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02511.x

  2. You have free access to this content
    Invasive cervical cancer audit: a relative increase in interval cancers while coverage increased and incidence declined

    BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology

    Volume 116, Issue 6, May 2009, Pages: 845–853, A Herbert, , M Gregory, SS Gupta and N Singh

    Version of Record online : 23 APR 2009, DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01990.x

  3. You have free access to this content
    Screen-detected invasive cervical carcinoma and its clinical significance during the introduction of organized screening

    BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology

    Volume 116, Issue 6, May 2009, Pages: 854–859, A Herbert, , M Gregory, SS Gupta and N Singh

    Version of Record online : 7 APR 2009, DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01989.x

  4. Determination of Ki67 Growth Fraction and Oestrogen Receptors In Screen-Detected Breast Cancer Using Cytological Preparations


    Volume 4, Issue 5, October 1993, Pages: 257–266, R. CODDINGTON, A. CUTHBERT, I. D. CAMPBELL, A. HERBERT, J. M. THEAKER, G. T. ROYLE and I. TAYLOR

    Version of Record online : 31 MAY 2007, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.1993.tb00100.x

  5. The effect of a screening programme on the outcome of colorectal cancer

    Colorectal Disease

    Volume 14, Issue 8, August 2012, Pages: 937–942, S. A. Suttie, I. A. Shaikh, A. I. Amin, T. Daniel and S. Yalamarthi

    Version of Record online : 27 JUL 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02842.x

  6. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III (CIN III) and invasive cervical carcinoma: the yawning gap revisited and the treatment of risk


    Volume 10, Issue 3, May 1999, Pages: 161–170, A. Herbert and J. A. E. Smith

    Version of Record online : 24 DEC 2001, DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2303.1999.00169.x

  7. ABC3 Part II: a review of the new criteria for evaluating cervical cytology in England


    Volume 23, Issue 6, December 2012, Pages: 360–370, R. G. Blanks

    Version of Record online : 22 NOV 2012, DOI: 10.1111/cyt.12032

  8. Large performance variation does not affect outcome in the Finnish cervical cancer screening programme


    Volume 23, Issue 3, June 2012, Pages: 172–180, S. Lönnberg, P. Nieminen, L. Kotaniemi-Talonen, H. Kujari, J. Melkko, G. Granroth, M. Vornanen, T. Pietiläinen, J. Arola, J. Tarkkanen, T. Luostarinen and A. Anttila

    Version of Record online : 24 JAN 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.2011.00849.x

  9. You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article
    Are international differences in breast cancer survival between Australia and the UK present amongst both screen-detected women and non-screen-detected women? survival estimates for women diagnosed in West Midlands and New South Wales 1997–2006

    International Journal of Cancer

    Volume 138, Issue 10, May 15 2016, Pages: 2404–2414, Laura M. Woods, Bernard Rachet, Dianne L. O'Connell, Gill Lawrence and Michel P. Coleman

    Version of Record online : 23 FEB 2016, DOI: 10.1002/ijc.29984

  10. Interval cervical cancer following treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

    International Journal of Gynecological Cancer

    Volume 10, Issue 3, May/June 2000, Pages: 198–202, R J. Gornall, I E. Boyd, T. Manolitsas and A. Herbert

    Version of Record online : 25 DEC 2001, DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1438.2000.010003198.x

  11. The development of the referral outcome diagram and an analysis of laboratory cancer detection rates in the English NHS cervical screening programme – is there an optimum level of detection of CIN 1 and CIN 2 lesions?


    Volume 19, Issue 4, August 2008, Pages: 244–253, R. G. Blanks

    Version of Record online : 9 MAY 2008, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.2008.00558.x

  12. You have free access to this content
    How many cervical cancers are prevented by treatment of screen-detected disease in young women?

    International Journal of Cancer

    Volume 124, Issue 2, 15 January 2009, Pages: 461–464, Peter Sasieni, Alejandra Castanon and D. Max Parkin

    Version of Record online : 9 OCT 2008, DOI: 10.1002/ijc.23922

  13. Estimating life expectancy and related probabilities in screen-detected breast cancer patients with restricted follow-up information

    Statistics in Medicine

    Volume 23, Issue 3, 15 February 2004, Pages: 431–448, Huub Straatman, André L. M. Verbeek, Petronella G. M. Peer and George Borm

    Version of Record online : 19 JAN 2004, DOI: 10.1002/sim.1539

  14. You have free access to this content
    Prognosis and pathology of screen-detected carcinomas


    Volume 117, Issue 7, 1 April 2011, Pages: 1360–1368, Iris D. Nagtegaal, Prue C. Allgood, Stephen W. Duffy, Olive Kearins, E. O. Sullivan, Nancy Tappenden, Matthew Wallis and Gill Lawrence

    Version of Record online : 2 NOV 2010, DOI: 10.1002/cncr.25613

  15. Ductal carcinoma in situ in Chinese women undergoing opportunistic breast cancer screening

    Surgical Practice

    Volume 18, Issue 1, February 2014, Pages: 8–14, Kwok-Kuen Ma, Silvia Suk-Sze Lau and Polly Suk-Yee Cheung

    Version of Record online : 17 FEB 2014, DOI: 10.1111/1744-1633.12042

  16. A stochastic model for survival of early prostate cancer with adjustments for leadtime, length bias, and over-detection

    Biometrical Journal

    Volume 54, Issue 1, January 2012, Pages: 20–44, Grace Hui-Min Wu, Anssi Auvinen, Amy Ming-Fang Yen, Matti Hakama, Stephen D. Walter and Hsiu-Hsi Chen

    Version of Record online : 23 DEC 2011, DOI: 10.1002/bimj.201000107

  17. You have free access to this content
    Increased non-prostate cancer death risk in clinically diagnosed prostate cancer

    BJU International

    Volume 110, Issue 2, July 2012, Pages: 188–194, Pim J. van Leeuwen, Suzie J. Otto, Ries Kranse, Monique J. Roobol, Meelan Bul, Xiaoye Zhu, Harry de Koning and Fritz H. Schröder

    Version of Record online : 30 JAN 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10811.x

  18. Mammographic Density, Estrogen Receptor Status and Other Breast Cancer Tumor Characteristics

    The Breast Journal

    Volume 16, Issue 3, May/June 2010, Pages: 279–289, Jane Ding, Ruth Warren, Anne Girling, Deborah Thompson and Douglas Easton

    Version of Record online : 12 APR 2010, DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2010.00907.x

  19. You have free access to this content
    Is coeliac disease screening in risk groups justified? A fourteen-year follow-up with special focus on compliance and quality of life

    Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics

    Volume 22, Issue 4, August 2005, Pages: 317–324, M. VILJAMAA, P. COLLIN, H. HUHTALA, H. SIEVÄNEN, M. MÄKI and K. KAUKINEN

    Version of Record online : 11 AUG 2005, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02574.x

  20. Analysis of colorectal cancer outcomes for the Australian National Bowel Cancer Screening Program

    Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology

    Volume 12, Issue 1, March 2016, Pages: 22–32, Australian Institute of Health and Welfare and the Australian Government Department of Health

    Version of Record online : 25 JAN 2016, DOI: 10.1111/ajco.12452