Search Results

There are 20292 results for: content related to: Identification of Abnormal Screening Mammogram Interpretation Using Medicare Claims Data

  1. Using Medicare Data to Estimate the Prevalence of Breast Cancer Screening in Older Women: Comparison of Different Methods to Identify Screening Mammograms

    Health Services Research

    Volume 37, Issue 6, December 2002, Pages: 1643–1657, Whitney M Randolph, Jonathan D Mahnken, James S Goodwin and Jean L Freeman

    Version of Record online : 18 DEC 2002, DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.10912

  2. Classification accuracy of claims-based methods for identifying providers failing to meet performance targets

    Statistics in Medicine

    Volume 34, Issue 1, 15 January 2015, Pages: 93–105, Rebecca A. Hubbard, Rhondee Benjamin-Johnson, Tracy Onega, Rebecca Smith-Bindman, Weiwei Zhu and Joshua J. Fenton

    Version of Record online : 10 OCT 2014, DOI: 10.1002/sim.6318

  3. You have free access to this content
    Increased Patient Concern After False-positive Mammograms

    Journal of General Internal Medicine

    Volume 16, Issue 3, March 2001, Pages: 150–156, Mary B. Barton, Sara Moore, Sarah Polk, Ernest Shtatland, Joann G. Elmore and Suzanne W. Fletcher

    Version of Record online : 9 JUN 2004, DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2001.00329.x

  4. Patient Factors Associated with Breast Cancer Screening Among Older Women

    Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

    Volume 44, Issue 10, October 1996, Pages: 1210–1214, Sandra L. Marwill, Karen M. Freund and Patricia P. Barry

    Version of Record online : 27 APR 2015, DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1996.tb01371.x

  5. The Effect of Immediate Reading of Screening Mammograms on Medical Care Utilization and Costs after False-Positive Mammograms

    Health Services Research

    Volume 42, Issue 4, August 2007, Pages: 1464–1482, Kate A. Stewart, Peter J. Neumann, Suzanne W. Fletcher and Mary B. Barton

    Version of Record online : 11 OCT 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00660.x

  6. You have free access to this content
    Trends in breast biopsy pathology diagnoses among women undergoing mammography in the United States: A report from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium

    Cancer

    Volume 121, Issue 9, May 1, 2015, Pages: 1369–1378, Kimberly H. Allison, Linn A. Abraham, Donald L. Weaver, Anna N. A. Tosteson, Heidi D. Nelson, Tracy Onega, Berta M. Geller, Karla Kerlikowske, Patricia A. Carney, Laura E. Ichikawa, Diana S. M. Buist and Joann G. Elmore

    Version of Record online : 20 JAN 2015, DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29199

  7. Impact of Geographic Barriers on the Utilization of Mammograms by Older Rural Women

    Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

    Volume 50, Issue 1, January 2002, Pages: 62–68, Kimberly K. Engelman, Daniel B. Hawley, Rona Gazaway, Michael C. Mosier, Jasjit S. Ahluwalia and Edward F. Ellerbeck

    Version of Record online : 21 JAN 2002, DOI: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50009.x

  8. You have free access to this content
    Malpractice claims following screening mammography in The Netherlands

    International Journal of Cancer

    Volume 131, Issue 6, 15 September 2012, Pages: 1360–1366, Vivian van Breest Smallenburg, Wikke Setz-Pels, Johanna H. Groenewoud, Adri C. Voogd, Frits H. Jansen, Marieke W.J. Louwman, Alexander V. Tielbeek and Lucien E.M. Duijm

    Version of Record online : 11 JAN 2012, DOI: 10.1002/ijc.27398

  9. You have free access to this content
    Mammographic screening: Patterns of use and estimated impact on breast carcinoma survival

    Cancer

    Volume 101, Issue 3, 1 August 2004, Pages: 495–507, Karen Blanchard, James A. Colbert, Dhruv Puri, Joel Weissman, Beverly Moy, Daniel B. Kopans, Emily M. Kaine, Richard H. Moore, Elkan F. Halpern, Kevin S. Hughes, Kenneth K. Tanabe, Barbara L. Smith and James S. Michaelson

    Version of Record online : 21 JUN 2004, DOI: 10.1002/cncr.20392

  10. You have free access to this content
    SCIENTIFIC ABSTRACTS

    Journal of General Internal Medicine

    Volume 19, Issue s1, April 2004, Pages: 109–241,

    Version of Record online : 16 APR 2004, DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.S1006_5.x

  11. You have free access to this content
    5-Year mammography rates and associated factors for older women

    Cancer

    Volume 97, Issue 5, 1 March 2003, Pages: 1147–1155, R. Van Harrison, Nancy K. Janz, Robert A. Wolfe, Philip J. Tedeschi, Xuelin Huang and Laurence F. McMahon Jr.

    Version of Record online : 20 FEB 2003, DOI: 10.1002/cncr.11172

  12. Variability in Mammography Use Among Older Women

    Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

    Volume 44, Issue 8, August 1996, Pages: 922–926, Risa B. Burns, Ellen P. McCarthy, Karen M. Freund, Sandra L. Marwill, Michael Shwartz, Arlene Ash and Mark A. Moskowitz

    Version of Record online : 27 APR 2015, DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1996.tb01861.x

  13. Mammography Use, Breast Cancer Stage at Diagnosis, and Survival Among Older Women

    Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

    Volume 48, Issue 10, October 2000, Pages: 1226–1233, Ellen P. McCarthy, Risa B. Burns, Karen M. Freund, Arlene S. Ash, Michael Shwartz, Sandra L. Marwill and Mark A. Moskowitz

    Version of Record online : 27 APR 2015, DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb02595.x

  14. You have free access to this content
    Comorbidities and mammography use interact to explain racial/ethnic disparities in breast cancer stage at diagnosis

    Cancer

    Volume 117, Issue 14, 15 July 2011, Pages: 3252–3261, Shagufta Yasmeen, Guibo Xing, Cyllene Morris, Rowan T. Chlebowski and Patrick S. Romano

    Version of Record online : 18 JAN 2011, DOI: 10.1002/cncr.25857

  15. Overuse of mammography during the first round of an organized breast cancer screening programme

    Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice

    Volume 15, Issue 4, August 2009, Pages: 620–625, Eric Chamot, Agathe Charvet and Thomas V. Perneger

    Version of Record online : 10 JUN 2009, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.01062.x

  16. You have free access to this content
    Why do large breast cancers still present in a population offered screening?

    International Journal of Cancer

    Volume 123, Issue 12, 15 December 2008, Pages: 2907–2914, Anne Kricker, Beth Newman, Dorota M. Gertig, Chris Goumas, Jane Armes and Bruce K. Armstrong

    Version of Record online : 3 SEP 2008, DOI: 10.1002/ijc.23829

  17. You have free access to this content
    Recall and detection rates in screening mammography

    Cancer

    Volume 100, Issue 8, 15 April 2004, Pages: 1590–1594, David Gur, Jules H. Sumkin, Lara A. Hardesty, Ronald J. Clearfield, Cathy S. Cohen, Marie A. Ganott, Christiane M. Hakim, Kathleen M. Harris, William R. Poller, Ratan Shah, Luisa P. Wallace and Howard E. Rockette

    Version of Record online : 8 MAR 2004, DOI: 10.1002/cncr.20053

  18. You have free access to this content
    Minimizing misclassification of hormone users at mammography screening

    International Journal of Cancer

    Volume 124, Issue 9, 1 May 2009, Pages: 2159–2165, Sisse Helle Njor, Anette Tønnes Pedersen, Walter Schwartz, Jesper Hallas and Elsebeth Lynge

    Version of Record online : 24 NOV 2008, DOI: 10.1002/ijc.24181

  19. Interventions for relieving the pain and discomfort of screening mammography

    Intervention Review

    The Cochrane Library

    Dawn Miller, Vicki Livingstone and G Peter Herbison

    Published Online : 23 JAN 2008, DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002942.pub2

  20. You have free access to this content
    Diagnostic mammography performance and race

    Cancer

    Volume 104, Issue 12, 15 December 2005, Pages: 2671–2681, Bonnie C. Yankaskas and Karminder S. Gill

    Version of Record online : 15 NOV 2005, DOI: 10.1002/cncr.21550