Search Results

There are 33220 results for: content related to: Dimethylfumarate: potency prediction and clinical experience

  1. Skin Immunology and Sensitisation

    Principles and Practice of Skin Toxicology

    Robert P. Chilcott, Shirley Price, Pages: 149–168, 2008

    Published Online : 4 SEP 2008, DOI: 10.1002/9780470773093.ch9

  2. Experience with local lymph node assay performance standards using standard radioactivity and nonradioactive cell count measurements

    Journal of Applied Toxicology

    Volume 32, Issue 8, August 2012, Pages: 590–596, David Basketter, Susanne N. Kolle, Arnhild Schrage, Naveed Honarvar, Armin O. Gamer, Bennard van Ravenzwaay and Robert Landsiedel

    Article first published online : 25 MAY 2011, DOI: 10.1002/jat.1684

  3. You have free access to this content
    The local lymph node assay and the assessment of relative potency: status of validation

    Contact Dermatitis

    Volume 57, Issue 2, August 2007, Pages: 70–75, David A. Basketter, Frank Gerberick and Ian Kimber

    Article first published online : 11 JUL 2007, DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01141.x

  4. Local lymph node assay: use in hazard and risk assessment

    Journal of Applied Toxicology

    Volume 19, Issue 5, September/October 1999, Pages: 299–306, R. J. Dearman, D. A. Basketter and I. Kimber

    Article first published online : 20 SEP 1999, DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1263(199909/10)19:5<299::AID-JAT591>3.0.CO;2-C

  5. Determinants of skin sensitisation potential

    Journal of Applied Toxicology

    Volume 28, Issue 3, April 2008, Pages: 377–387, David W. Roberts and Aynur O. Aptula

    Article first published online : 17 AUG 2007, DOI: 10.1002/jat.1289

  6. A future approach to measuring relative skin sensitising potency: a proposal

    Journal of Applied Toxicology

    Volume 26, Issue 4, July/August 2006, Pages: 341–350, Ian R. Jowsey, David A. Basketter, Carl Westmoreland and Ian Kimber

    Article first published online : 13 JUN 2006, DOI: 10.1002/jat.1146

  7. The skin sensitization potential of resorcinol: experience with the local lymph node assay

    Contact Dermatitis

    Volume 56, Issue 4, April 2007, Pages: 196–200, David A. Basketter, David Sanders and Ian R. Jowsey

    Article first published online : 2 MAR 2007, DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2006.01008.x

  8. Skin sensitization, false positives and false negatives: experience with guinea pig assays

    Journal of Applied Toxicology

    Volume 30, Issue 5, July 2010, Pages: 381–386, David A. Basketter and Ian Kimber

    Article first published online : 28 JUN 2010, DOI: 10.1002/jat.1545

  9. Risk Assessment of Dimethylfumarate Residues in Dwellings Following Contamination by Treated Furniture

    Risk Analysis

    Volume 34, Issue 5, May 2014, Pages: 879–888, C. Rousselle, V. Pernelet-Joly, C. Mourton-Gilles, J. P. Lepoittevin, R. Vincent, A. Lefranc and R. Garnier

    Article first published online : 11 DEC 2013, DOI: 10.1111/risa.12147

  10. Use of the local lymph node assay for the estimation of relative contact allergenic potency

    Contact Dermatitis

    Volume 42, Issue 6, June 2000, Pages: 344–348, D. A. Basketter, L. Blaikie, R. J. Dearman, I. Kimber, C. A. Ryan, G. F. Gerberick, P. Harvey, P. Evans, I. R. White and R. J. G. Rycroft

    Article first published online : 24 DEC 2001, DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0536.2000.042006344.x

  11. The critical review of methodologies and approaches to assess the inherent skin sensitization potential (skin allergies) of chemicals Part II

    Contact Dermatitis

    Volume 66, Issue s1, April 2012, Pages: 25–52, Jacob P. Thyssen, Elena Giménez-Arnau, Jean-Pierre Lepoittevin, Torkil Menné, Anders Boman and Axel Schnuch

    Article first published online : 1 MAR 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2011.02004_3.x

  12. You have free access to this content
    Nothing is perfect, not even the local lymph node assay: a commentary and the implications for REACH

    Contact Dermatitis

    Volume 60, Issue 2, February 2009, Pages: 65–69, David A. Basketter, John F. McFadden, Frank Gerberick, Amanda Cockshott and Ian Kimber

    Article first published online : 28 JAN 2009, DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2008.01444.x

  13. You have free access to this content
    Information derived from sensitization test methods: test sensitivity, false positives and false negatives

    Contact Dermatitis

    Volume 56, Issue 1, January 2007, Pages: 1–4, David A. Basketter and Ian Kimber

    Article first published online : 14 DEC 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01009.x

  14. Novel approach for classifying chemicals according to skin sensitizing potency by non-radioisotopic modification of the local lymph node assay

    Journal of Applied Toxicology

    Volume 25, Issue 2, March/April 2005, Pages: 129–134, Masahiro Takeyoshi, Kenji Iida, Keiji Shiraishi and Satsuki Hoshuyama

    Article first published online : 2 MAR 2005, DOI: 10.1002/jat.1045

  15. Advantage of using CBA/N strain mice in a non-radioisotopic modification of the local lymph node assay

    Journal of Applied Toxicology

    Volume 26, Issue 1, January/February 2006, Pages: 5–9, Masahiro Takeyoshi, Shuji Noda, Kanji Yamasaki and Ian Kimber

    Article first published online : 11 OCT 2005, DOI: 10.1002/jat.1096

  16. Evaluation of combinations of in vitro sensitization test descriptors for the artificial neural network-based risk assessment model of skin sensitization

    Journal of Applied Toxicology

    Volume 35, Issue 11, November 2015, Pages: 1333–1347, Morihiko Hirota, Shiho Fukui, Kenji Okamoto, Satoru Kurotani, Noriyasu Imai, Miyuki Fujishiro, Daiki Kyotani, Yoshinao Kato, Toshihiko Kasahara, Masaharu Fujita, Akemi Toyoda, Daisuke Sekiya, Shinichi Watanabe, Hirokazu Seto, Osamu Takenouchi, Takao Ashikaga and Masaaki Miyazawa

    Article first published online : 30 MAR 2015, DOI: 10.1002/jat.3105

  17. Updating the skin sensitization in vitro data assessment paradigm in 2009

    Journal of Applied Toxicology

    Volume 29, Issue 6, August 2009, Pages: 545–550, David A. Basketter and Ian Kimber

    Article first published online : 29 MAY 2009, DOI: 10.1002/jat.1443

  18. You have free access to this content
    Read-across to rank skin sensitization potential: subcategories for the Michael acceptor domain

    Contact Dermatitis

    Volume 60, Issue 1, January 2009, Pages: 21–31, Terry Wayne Schultz, Kathryn Rogers and Aynur Osman Aptula

    Article first published online : 6 JAN 2009, DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2008.01473.x

  19. Comparison of outcomes obtained in murine local lymph node assays using CBA/J or CBA/Ca mice

    Journal of Applied Toxicology

    Yosuke Maeda, Haruka Hirosaki, Naoaki Yakata and Masahiro Takeyoshi

    Article first published online : 12 OCT 2015, DOI: 10.1002/jat.3250

  20. An evaluation of the suitability of benzocaine as a positive control skin sensitizer

    Contact Dermatitis

    Volume 33, Issue 1, July 1995, Pages: 28–32, D. A. Basketter, E. W. Scholes, H. Wahlkvist and J. Montelius

    Article first published online : 11 APR 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1995.tb00443.x