Search Results

There are 8636 results for: content related to: Revealing secondary seed removers: results from camera trapping

  1. You have free access to this content
    REVIEW: Wildlife camera trapping: a review and recommendations for linking surveys to ecological processes

    Journal of Applied Ecology

    Volume 52, Issue 3, June 2015, Pages: 675–685, A. Cole Burton, Eric Neilson, Dario Moreira, Andrew Ladle, Robin Steenweg, Jason T. Fisher, Erin Bayne and Stan Boutin

    Article first published online : 11 APR 2015, DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.12432

  2. Brazilian Tapir Density in the Pantanal: A Comparison of Systematic Camera-Trapping and Line-Transect Surveys


    Volume 40, Issue 2, March 2008, Pages: 211–217, Mogens Trolle, Andrew J. Noss, José Luis Passos Cordeiro and Luiz Flamarion B. Oliveira

    Article first published online : 25 SEP 2007, DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2007.00350.x

  3. Camera traps and mark-resight models: The value of ancillary data for evaluating assumptions

    The Journal of Wildlife Management

    Volume 79, Issue 7, September 2015, Pages: 1163–1172, Arielle W. Parsons, Theodore R. Simons, Kenneth H. Pollock, Michael K. Stoskopf, Jessica J. Stocking and Allan F. O'connell Jr.

    Article first published online : 13 AUG 2015, DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.931

  4. Wildcat population density on the Etna volcano, Italy: a comparison of density estimation methods

    Journal of Zoology

    Volume 293, Issue 4, August 2014, Pages: 252–261, S. Anile, B. Ragni, E. Randi, F. Mattucci and F. Rovero

    Article first published online : 22 APR 2014, DOI: 10.1111/jzo.12141

  5. You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article
    Under the snow: a new camera trap opens the white box of subnivean ecology

    Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation

    Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2015, Pages: 29–38, Eeva M. Soininen, Ingrid Jensvoll, Siw T. Killengreen and Rolf A. Ims

    Article first published online : 14 MAY 2015, DOI: 10.1002/rse2.2

  6. Bayesian inference in camera trapping studies for a class of spatial capture–recapture models


    Volume 90, Issue 11, November 2009, Pages: 3233–3244, J. Andrew Royle, K. Ullas Karanth, Arjun M. Gopalaswamy and N. Samba Kumar

    Article first published online : 1 NOV 2009, DOI: 10.1890/08-1481.1

  7. A direct comparison of camera-trapping and sign transects for monitoring wildlife in the Wanglang National Nature Reserve, China

    Wildlife Society Bulletin

    Volume 36, Issue 3, September 2012, Pages: 538–545, Sheng Li, William J. McShea, Dajun Wang, Junzhong Huang and Liangkun Shao

    Article first published online : 19 JUL 2012, DOI: 10.1002/wsb.161

  8. Changing use of camera traps in mammalian field research: habitats, taxa and study types

    Mammal Review

    Volume 43, Issue 3, July 2013, Pages: 196–206, Jamie McCallum

    Article first published online : 11 OCT 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2907.2012.00216.x

  9. You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article
    Using time-to-event analysis to complement hierarchical methods when assessing determinants of photographic detectability during camera trapping

    Methods in Ecology and Evolution

    Volume 5, Issue 1, January 2014, Pages: 44–53, Richard Bischof, Shoaib Hameed, Hussain Ali, Muhammad Kabir, Muhammad Younas, Kursheed A. Shah, Jaffar U. Din and Muhammad A. Nawaz

    Article first published online : 8 OCT 2013, DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.12115

  10. Lowland tapir (Tapirus terrestris) distribution, activity patterns and relative abundance in the Greater Madidi-Tambopata Landscape

    Integrative Zoology

    Volume 7, Issue 4, December 2012, Pages: 407–419, Robert WALLACE, Guido AYALA and Maria VISCARRA

    Article first published online : 16 DEC 2012, DOI: 10.1111/1749-4877.12010

  11. How Small is too Small? Camera Trap Survey Areas and Density Estimates for Ocelots in the Bolivian Chaco


    Volume 40, Issue 1, January 2008, Pages: 71–75, Leonardo Maffei and Andrew J. Noss

    Article first published online : 18 JUL 2007, DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2007.00341.x

  12. Improving abundance estimation by combining capture–recapture and occupancy data: example with a large carnivore

    Journal of Applied Ecology

    Volume 51, Issue 6, December 2014, Pages: 1733–1739, Laetitia Blanc, Eric Marboutin, Sylvain Gatti, Fridolin Zimmermann and Olivier Gimenez

    Article first published online : 27 SEP 2014, DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.12319

  13. Density estimation of sympatric carnivores using spatially explicit capture–recapture methods and standard trapping grid

    Ecological Applications

    Volume 21, Issue 8, December 2011, Pages: 2908–2916, Timothy G. O'Brien and Margaret F. Kinnaird

    Article first published online : 1 DEC 2011, DOI: 10.1890/10-2284.1

  14. You have free access to this content
    Automatic Storage and Analysis of Camera Trap Data

    The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America

    Volume 91, Issue 3, July 2010, Pages: 352–360, Grant Harris, Ron Thompson, Jack L. Childs and James G. Sanderson

    Article first published online : 1 JUL 2010, DOI: 10.1890/0012-9623-91.3.352

  15. Ocelot home range, overlap and density: comparing radio telemetry with camera trapping

    Journal of Zoology

    Volume 275, Issue 4, August 2008, Pages: 391–398, A. Dillon and M. J. Kelly

    Article first published online : 27 MAY 2008, DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2008.00452.x

  16. You have free access to this content
    Estimating animal density using camera traps without the need for individual recognition

    Journal of Applied Ecology

    Volume 45, Issue 4, August 2008, Pages: 1228–1236, J. Marcus Rowcliffe, Juliet Field, Samuel T. Turvey and Chris Carbone

    Article first published online : 16 MAY 2008, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01473.x

  17. Discovery of Miller's Grizzled Langur (Presbytis hosei canicrus) in Wehea Forest Confirms the Continued Existence and Extends Known Geographical Range of an Endangered Primate

    American Journal of Primatology


    Article first published online : 24 JAN 2012, DOI: 10.1002/ajp.21983

  18. A critique of density estimation from camera-trap data

    The Journal of Wildlife Management

    Volume 76, Issue 2, February 2012, Pages: 224–236, Rebecca J. Foster and Bart J. Harmsen

    Article first published online : 29 DEC 2011, DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.275

  19. You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article
    Applying a random encounter model to estimate lion density from camera traps in Serengeti National Park, Tanzania

    The Journal of Wildlife Management

    Volume 79, Issue 6, August 2015, Pages: 1014–1021, Jeremy J. Cusack, Alexandra Swanson, Tim Coulson, Craig Packer, Chris Carbone, Amy J. Dickman, Margaret Kosmala, Chris Lintott and J. Marcus Rowcliffe

    Article first published online : 28 MAY 2015, DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.902

  20. You have free access to this content
    Why camera traps fail to detect a semi-aquatic mammal: Activation devices as possible cause

    Wildlife Society Bulletin

    Volume 39, Issue 1, March 2015, Pages: 193–196, Laura Lerone, Giuseppe M. Carpaneto and Anna Loy

    Article first published online : 15 JAN 2015, DOI: 10.1002/wsb.508