Search Results

There are 139338 results for: content related to: The prevalence and morbidity of sensitization to fragrance mix I in the general population

  1. Contact sensitization to fragrances in the general population: a Koch’s approach may reveal the burden of disease

    British Journal of Dermatology

    Volume 160, Issue 4, April 2009, Pages: 729–735, J.P. Thyssen, T. Menné, A. Linneberg and J.D. Johansen

    Version of Record online : 4 FEB 2009, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2008.09022.x

  2. Fragrance mix I patch test reactions in 5006 consecutive dermatitis patients tested simultaneously with TRUE Test® and Trolab® test material

    Contact Dermatitis

    Volume 63, Issue 5, November 2010, Pages: 248–253, Charlotte Gotthard Mortz and Klaus Ejner Andersen

    Version of Record online : 14 OCT 2010, DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2010.01776.x

  3. You have free access to this content
    Categorization of fragrance contact allergens for prioritization of preventive measures: clinical and experimental data and consideration of structure–activity relationships

    Contact Dermatitis

    Volume 69, Issue 4, October 2013, Pages: 196–230, Wolfgang Uter, Jeanne D. Johansen, Anna Börje, Ann-Therese Karlberg, Carola Lidén, Suresh Rastogi, David Roberts and Ian R. White

    Version of Record online : 27 JUL 2013, DOI: 10.1111/cod.12117

  4. Contact allergy to fragrances: current patch test results (2005–2008) from the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology

    Contact Dermatitis

    Volume 63, Issue 5, November 2010, Pages: 254–261, Wolfgang Uter, Johannes Geier, Peter Frosch and Axel Schnuch

    Version of Record online : 20 AUG 2010, DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2010.01759.x

  5. You have free access to this content
    Contact sensitization to fragrance mix I and II, to Myroxylon pereirae resin and oil of tupentine: multifactorial analysis of risk factors based on data of the IVDK network

    Flavour and Fragrance Journal

    Volume 30, Issue 4, July 2015, Pages: 255–263, Wolfgang Uter, Cornelia Fieβler, Olaf Gefeller, Johannes Geier and Axel Schnuch

    Version of Record online : 17 APR 2015, DOI: 10.1002/ffj.3242

  6. Frequency of and trends in fragrance allergy over a 15-year period

    Contact Dermatitis

    Volume 58, Issue 3, March 2008, Pages: 134–141, Andrea Nardelli, An Carbonez, Winfried Ottoy, Jacques Drieghe and An Goossens

    Version of Record online : 16 JAN 2008, DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01287.x

  7. Reactivity to sorbitan sesquioleate affects reactivity to fragrance mix I

    Contact Dermatitis

    Volume 73, Issue 5, November 2015, Pages: 296–304, Johannes Geier, Axel Schnuch, Holger Lessmann and Wolfgang Uter

    Version of Record online : 28 AUG 2015, DOI: 10.1111/cod.12468

  8. Fragrance mix II in the baseline series contributes significantly to detection of fragrance allergy

    Contact Dermatitis

    Volume 63, Issue 5, November 2010, Pages: 270–276, Maria V Heisterberg, Klaus E Andersen, Christian Avnstorp, Berit Kristensen, Ove Kristensen, Knud Kaaber, Grete Laurberg, Torkil Menné, Niels Henrik Nielsen, Mette Sommerlund, Jens Thormann, Niels K Veien, Susanne Vissing and Jeanne D Johansen

    Version of Record online : 14 OCT 2010, DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2010.01737.x

  9. You have free access to this content
    Fragrance mix I and II: results of breakdown tests

    Flavour and Fragrance Journal

    Volume 30, Issue 4, July 2015, Pages: 264–274, Johannes Geier, Wolfgang Uter, Holger Lessmann and Axel Schnuch

    Version of Record online : 2 APR 2015, DOI: 10.1002/ffj.3247

  10. Patch testing with a new fragrance mix detects additional patients sensitive to perfumes and missed by the current fragrance mix

    Contact Dermatitis

    Volume 52, Issue 4, April 2005, Pages: 207–215, Peter J. Frosch, Claudia Pirker, Suresh C. Rastogi, Klaus E. Andersen, Magnus Bruze, Cecilia Svedman, An Goossens, Ian R. White, Wolfgang Uter, Elena Giménez Arnau, Jean-Pierre Lepoittevin, Torkil Menné and Jeanne Duus Johansen

    Version of Record online : 27 APR 2005, DOI: 10.1111/j.0105-1873.2005.00565.x

  11. Prevalence of fragrance contact allergy in the general population of five European countries: a cross-sectional study

    British Journal of Dermatology

    Volume 173, Issue 6, December 2015, Pages: 1411–1419, T.L. Diepgen, R. Ofenloch, M. Bruze, S. Cazzaniga, P.J. Coenraads, P. Elsner, M. Goncalo, Å. Svensson and L. Naldi

    Version of Record online : 7 NOV 2015, DOI: 10.1111/bjd.14151

  12. Allergic contact dermatitis from fragrance components in specific topical pharmaceutical products in Belgium

    Contact Dermatitis

    Volume 60, Issue 6, June 2009, Pages: 303–313, Andrea Nardelli, Ellen D’Hooghe, Jacques Drieghe, Marc Dooms and An Goossens

    Version of Record online : 26 MAY 2009, DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2009.01542.x

  13. Atopy and contact allergy to fragrance: allergic reactions to the fragrance mix I (the Larsen mix)

    Contact Dermatitis

    Volume 59, Issue 4, October 2008, Pages: 220–225, Deirdre A. Buckley, David A. Basketter, Denis Kan-King-Yu, Ian R. White, Jonathan L. M. White and John P. McFadden

    Version of Record online : 30 SEP 2008, DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2008.01373.x

  14. Fragrance contact allergy: a 4-year retrospective study

    Contact Dermatitis

    Volume 63, Issue 2, August 2010, Pages: 77–84, Laura Cuesta, Juan Francisco Silvestre, Fernando Toledo, Ana Lucas, María Pérez-Crespo and Irene Ballester

    Version of Record online : 22 JUN 2010, DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2010.01739.x

  15. Simultaneous sensitivity to fragrances

    British Journal of Dermatology

    Volume 154, Issue 5, May 2006, Pages: 885–888, D.A. Buckley, D.A. Basketter, C.K. Smith Pease, R.J.G. Rycroft, I.R. White and J.P. McFadden

    Version of Record online : 2 MAR 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07170.x

  16. Stability of fragrance patch test preparations applied in test chambers

    British Journal of Dermatology

    Volume 167, Issue 4, October 2012, Pages: 822–827, M. Mowitz, E. Zimerson, C. Svedman and M. Bruze

    Version of Record online : 26 SEP 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2012.11143.x

  17. Patch testing with fragrance mix II: results of the IVDK 2005–2008

    Contact Dermatitis

    Volume 63, Issue 5, November 2010, Pages: 262–269, Andrea Krautheim, Wolfgang Uter, Peter Frosch, Axel Schnuch and Johannes Geier

    Version of Record online : 14 OCT 2010, DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2010.01753.x

  18. Patch test results with fragrance markers of the baseline series – analysis of the European Surveillance System on Contact Allergies (ESSCA) network 2009–2012

    Contact Dermatitis

    Volume 73, Issue 3, September 2015, Pages: 163–171, Peter J. Frosch, Jeanne Duus Johansen, Marie-Louise A. Schuttelaar, Juan F. Silvestre, Javier Sánchez-Pérez, Elke Weisshaar, Wolfgang Uter and (on behalf of the ESSCA network)

    Version of Record online : 16 JUN 2015, DOI: 10.1111/cod.12420

  19. Trends of contact allergy to fragrance mix I and Myroxylon pereirae among Danish eczema patients tested between 1985 and 2007

    Contact Dermatitis

    Volume 59, Issue 4, October 2008, Pages: 238–244, Jacob P. Thyssen, Berit Christina Carlsen, Torkil Menné and Jeanne Duus Johansen

    Version of Record online : 30 SEP 2008, DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2008.01418.x

  20. Fragrance contact allergy in Iran

    Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology

    Volume 24, Issue 12, December 2010, Pages: 1437–1441, A Firooz, M Nassiri-Kashani, A Khatami, F Gorouhi, S Babakoohi, L Montaser-Kouhsari, P Davari and Y Dowlati

    Version of Record online : 9 NOV 2010, DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2010.03665.x