Search Results

There are 2998 results for: content related to: Comparison of cytology and histology results in English cervical screening laboratories before and after liquid-based cytology conversion: do the data provide evidence for a single category of high-grade dyskaryosis?

  1. You have free access to this content
    The revised BSCC terminology for abnormal cervical cytology

    Cytopathology

    Volume 19, Issue 3, June 2008, Pages: 137–157, K. J. Denton, A. Herbert, L. S. Turnbull, C. Waddell, M. S. Desai, D. N. Rana, N. Dudding, J. H. F. Smith and on behalf of the British Society of Clinical Cytology

    Article first published online : 19 MAY 2008, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.2008.00585.x

  2. Achievable standards, Benchmarks for reporting, and Criteria for evaluating cervical cytopathologySecond edition including revised performance indicators

    Cytopathology

    Volume 11, Issue 4, August 2000, Pages: 212–241,

    Article first published online : 24 DEC 2001, DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2303.2000.00269.x

  3. Proposed Sheffield quantitative criteria in cervical cytology to assist the grading of squamous cell dyskaryosis, as the British Society for Clinical Cytology definitions require amendment

    Cytopathology

    Volume 16, Issue 4, August 2005, Pages: 179–192, D. N. Slater, S. Rice, R. Stewart, S. E. Melling, E. M. Hewer and J. H. F. Smith

    Article first published online : 25 JUL 2005, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.2005.00271.x

  4. Bland dyskaryosis: a new pitfall in liquid-based cytology

    Cytopathology

    Volume 19, Issue 3, June 2008, Pages: 162–166, K. Denton, D. N. Rana, M. A. Lynch and M. S. Desai

    Article first published online : 19 DEC 2007, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.2007.00530.x

  5. Five-year follow-up of women with borderline and mildly dyskaryotic cervical smears

    Cytopathology

    Volume 15, Issue 5, October 2004, Pages: 263–270, D. N. Rana, J. Marshall, M. Desai, H. C. Kitchener, D. M. Perera, H. El Teraifi and R. V. Persad

    Article first published online : 28 SEP 2004, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.2004.00194.x

  6. Evaluation of liquid-based cytology in cervical screening of high-risk populations: a split study of colposcopy and genito-urinary medicine populations

    Cytopathology

    Volume 13, Issue 3, June 2002, Pages: 152–159, M. RING, N. BOLGER, M. O'DONNELL, A. MALKIN, N. BERMINGHAM, E. AKPAN, F. MULCAHY, M. J. TURNER, M. GRIFFIN and J. J. O'LEARY

    Article first published online : 17 JUN 2002, DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2303.2002.00408.x

  7. Estimation of disease severity in the NHS cervical screening programme. Part I: artificial cut-off points and semi-quantitative solutions

    Cytopathology

    Volume 22, Issue 3, June 2011, Pages: 146–154, R. G. Blanks

    Article first published online : 14 OCT 2010, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.2010.00813.x

  8. An alternative approach to the management dilemma of the mildly dyskaryotic smear based on audit of outcome

    Cytopathology

    Volume 11, Issue 4, August 2000, Pages: 268–274, O. O. Ifaturoti, S. Lockwood, M. Etheridge, P. S. Ong, F. Rashid and M. H. Jones

    Article first published online : 24 DEC 2001, DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2303.2000.00252.x

  9. The number of dyskaryotic cells on an initial ThinPrep® cervical sample showing mild dyskaryosis has predictive value

    Cytopathology

    Volume 16, Issue 3, June 2005, Pages: 120–124, N. Banville, M. Murray, L. Turner, D. Magee and D. Gibbons

    Article first published online : 25 MAY 2005, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.2005.00252.x

  10. Do borderline nuclear changes in gynaecological cytlogy constitute a reliable reporting category?

    Cytopathology

    Volume 13, Issue 4, August 2002, Pages: 220–231,

    Article first published online : 19 SEP 2002, DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2303.2002.00416.x

  11. Borderline nuclear change, high-grade dyskaryosis not excluded: current concepts and impact on clinical practice

    Cytopathology

    Volume 23, Issue 6, December 2012, Pages: 396–401, S. Soo Hoo, A. Patel, H. Buist, K. Galaal, J. D. Hemming and R. Naik

    Article first published online : 4 DEC 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.2011.00943.x

  12. BSCC terminology for cervical cytology: two or three tiers? Why not five, seven or even 14?

    Cytopathology

    Volume 15, Issue 5, October 2004, Pages: 245–251, A. Herbert

    Article first published online : 28 SEP 2004, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.2004.00193.x

  13. Outcome of women with index smear showing mild dyskaryosis: effects of age and evidence of HPV infection

    Cytopathology

    Volume 16, Issue 6, December 2005, Pages: 281–289, C. M. Winn and H. Jones

    Article first published online : 22 NOV 2005, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.2005.00306.x

  14. ABC3 Part II: a review of the new criteria for evaluating cervical cytology in England

    Cytopathology

    Volume 23, Issue 6, December 2012, Pages: 360–370, R. G. Blanks

    Article first published online : 22 NOV 2012, DOI: 10.1111/cyt.12032

  15. Transformation zone sampling rate is a useful performance indicator for practitioners collecting cervical samples using SurePathTM liquid-based cytology system

    Cytopathology

    Volume 18, Issue 4, August 2007, Pages: 220–224, N. Narine and W. Young

    Article first published online : 18 JUN 2007, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.2007.00454.x

  16. You have free access to this content
    The evaluation of human papillomavirus genotyping in cervical liquid-based cytology specimens; using the Roche Linear Array HPV genotyping assay

    Cytopathology

    Volume 20, Issue 4, August 2009, Pages: 242–248, J. Jamison, R. T. Wilson and J. Carson

    Article first published online : 9 MAR 2009, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.2009.00643.x

  17. ABC3 Part I: a review of the guidelines for terminology, classification and management of cervical cytology in England

    Cytopathology

    Volume 23, Issue 6, December 2012, Pages: 353–359, J. H. F. Smith

    Article first published online : 22 NOV 2012, DOI: 10.1111/cyt.12031

  18. Performance of the DNA-Citoliq liquid-based cytology system compared with conventional smears

    Cytopathology

    Volume 17, Issue 2, April 2006, Pages: 86–93, V. A. F. Alves, A. Castelo, A. L. Filho, M. R. Vianna, E. Taromaru, G. Namiyama, A. Lorincz, G. B. D. Dores and DNA-Citoliq Working Group, São Paulo, Brazil

    Article first published online : 21 MAR 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.2006.00279.x

  19. The NHS Cervical Screening Programme criteria for evaluating cervical cytology: comparison of the new with the old

    Cytopathology

    Volume 23, Issue 6, December 2012, Pages: 349–352, R. Dina and D. Argamosa

    Article first published online : 22 NOV 2012, DOI: 10.1111/cyt.12035

  20. The correlation between the grade of dyskaryosis on cervical smear, grade of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) on punch biopsy and the final histological diagnosis on cone biopsies of the cervix

    Cytopathology

    Volume 9, Issue 2, April 1998, Pages: 93–99, M. K. Heatley and J. P. Bury

    Article first published online : 10 SEP 2004, DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2303.1998.00094.x