Search Results

There are 2667 results for: content related to: Bird population density estimated from acoustic signals

  1. Density-dependent home-range size revealed by spatially explicit capture–recapture

    Ecography

    Volume 39, Issue 7, July 2016, Pages: 676–688, M. G. Efford, D. K. Dawson, Y. V. Jhala and Q. Qureshi

    Version of Record online : 7 SEP 2015, DOI: 10.1111/ecog.01511

  2. Estimating population size by spatially explicit capture–recapture

    Oikos

    Volume 122, Issue 6, June 2013, Pages: 918–928, Murray G. Efford and Rachel M. Fewster

    Version of Record online : 25 OCT 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2012.20440.x

  3. You have free access to this content
    Varying effort in capture–recapture studies

    Methods in Ecology and Evolution

    Volume 4, Issue 7, July 2013, Pages: 629–636, Murray G. Efford, David L. Borchers and Garth Mowat

    Version of Record online : 8 APR 2013, DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.12049

  4. Predicting bobcat abundance at a landscape scale and evaluating occupancy as a density index in central Wisconsin

    The Journal of Wildlife Management

    Volume 79, Issue 3, April 2015, Pages: 469–480, John D.J. Clare, Eric M. Anderson and David M. MacFarland

    Version of Record online : 25 FEB 2015, DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.844

  5. Spatial capture–mark–resight estimation of animal population density

    Biometrics

    Murray G. Efford and Christine M. Hunter

    Version of Record online : 23 AUG 2017, DOI: 10.1111/biom.12766

  6. You have free access to this content
    Reply to Efford on ‘Integrating resource selection information with spatial capture–recapture’

    Methods in Ecology and Evolution

    Volume 5, Issue 7, July 2014, Pages: 603–605, J. Andrew Royle, Richard B. Chandler, Catherine C. Sun and Angela K. Fuller

    Version of Record online : 26 MAY 2014, DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.12205

  7. You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article
    Negative effects of density on space use of small mammals differ with the phase of the masting-induced population cycle

    Ecology and Evolution

    Volume 6, Issue 23, December 2016, Pages: 8423–8430, Michał Bogdziewicz, Rafał Zwolak, Lauren Redosh, Leszek Rychlik and Elizabeth E. Crone

    Version of Record online : 26 OCT 2016, DOI: 10.1002/ece3.2513

  8. Estimating cumulative exposure of wildlife to non-lethal disturbance using spatially explicit capture–recapture models

    The Journal of Wildlife Management

    Volume 79, Issue 2, February 2015, Pages: 311–324, Fredrik Christiansen, Chiara G. Bertulli, Marianne H. Rasmussen and David Lusseau

    Version of Record online : 9 JAN 2015, DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.836

  9. Compensatory heterogeneity in spatially explicit capture–recapture data

    Ecology

    Volume 95, Issue 5, May 2014, Pages: 1341–1348, M. G. Efford and G. Mowat

    Version of Record online : 1 MAY 2014, DOI: 10.1890/13-1497.1

  10. You have free access to this content
    A general framework for animal density estimation from acoustic detections across a fixed microphone array

    Methods in Ecology and Evolution

    Volume 6, Issue 1, January 2015, Pages: 38–48, Ben C. Stevenson, David L. Borchers, Res Altwegg, René J. Swift, Douglas M. Gillespie and G. John Measey

    Version of Record online : 16 NOV 2014, DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.12291

  11. You have free access to this content
    Dispersal sinks and handling effects: interpreting the role of immigration in common brushtail possum populations

    Journal of Animal Ecology

    Volume 70, Issue 3, May 2001, Pages: 515–526, Michael Clinchy, Charles J. Krebs and Peter J. Jarman

    Version of Record online : 26 MAR 2002, DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2656.2001.00510.x

  12. You have free access to this content
    Population density estimated from locations of individuals on a passive detector array

    Ecology

    Volume 90, Issue 10, October 2009, Pages: 2676–2682, Murray G. Efford, Deanna K. Dawson and David L. Borchers

    Version of Record online : 1 OCT 2009, DOI: 10.1890/08-1735.1

  13. The estimation of grizzly bear density through hair-snagging techniques above the tree line

    Wildlife Society Bulletin

    Volume 39, Issue 2, June 2015, Pages: 390–402, Mathieu Dumond, John Boulanger and David Paetkau

    Version of Record online : 12 FEB 2015, DOI: 10.1002/wsb.520

  14. You have free access to this content
    Estimation of population density by spatially explicit capture–recapture analysis of data from area searches

    Ecology

    Volume 92, Issue 12, December 2011, Pages: 2202–2207, Murray G. Efford

    Version of Record online : 1 DEC 2011, DOI: 10.1890/11-0332.1

  15. Using simulation to compare methods for estimating density from capture–recapture data

    Ecology

    Volume 94, Issue 4, April 2013, Pages: 817–826, Jacob S. Ivan, Gary C. White and Tanya M. Shenk

    Version of Record online : 1 APR 2013, DOI: 10.1890/12-0102.1

  16. An empirical evaluation of camera trapping and spatially explicit capture-recapture models for estimating chimpanzee density

    American Journal of Primatology

    Volume 79, Issue 7, July 2017, Marie-Lyne Després-Einspenner, Eric J. Howe, Pierre Drapeau and Hjalmar S. Kühl

    Version of Record online : 7 MAR 2017, DOI: 10.1002/ajp.22647

  17. You have free access to this content
    Empirical comparison of density estimators for large carnivores

    Journal of Applied Ecology

    Volume 47, Issue 1, February 2010, Pages: 76–84, Martyn E. Obbard, Eric J. Howe and Christopher J. Kyle

    Version of Record online : 23 DEC 2009, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01758.x

  18. You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article
    Estimating animal population density using passive acoustics

    Biological Reviews

    Volume 88, Issue 2, May 2013, Pages: 287–309, Tiago A. Marques, Len Thomas, Stephen W. Martin, David K. Mellinger, Jessica A. Ward, David J. Moretti, Danielle Harris and Peter L. Tyack

    Version of Record online : 29 NOV 2012, DOI: 10.1111/brv.12001

  19. Spatial capture–recapture model performance with known small-mammal densities

    Ecological Applications

    Volume 25, Issue 3, April 2015, Pages: 695–705, Brian D. Gerber and Robert R. Parmenter

    Version of Record online : 1 APR 2015, DOI: 10.1890/14-0960.1

  20. Density estimation of sympatric carnivores using spatially explicit capture–recapture methods and standard trapping grid

    Ecological Applications

    Volume 21, Issue 8, December 2011, Pages: 2908–2916, Timothy G. O'Brien and Margaret F. Kinnaird

    Version of Record online : 1 DEC 2011, DOI: 10.1890/10-2284.1