Search Results

There are 38296 results for: content related to: Towards the modelling of true species distributions

  1. You have free access to this content
    Predicting species distributions from checklist data using site-occupancy models

    Journal of Biogeography

    Volume 37, Issue 10, October 2010, Pages: 1851–1862, Marc Kéry, Beth Gardner and Christian Monnerat

    Version of Record online : 22 JUN 2010, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2010.02345.x

  2. Site-Occupancy Distribution Modeling to Correct Population-Trend Estimates Derived from Opportunistic Observations

    Conservation Biology

    Volume 24, Issue 5, October 2010, Pages: 1388–1397, MARC KÉRY, J. ANDREW ROYLE, HANS SCHMID, MICHAEL SCHAUB, BERNARD VOLET, GUIDO HÄFLIGER and NIKLAUS ZBINDEN

    Version of Record online : 10 MAR 2010, DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01479.x

  3. You have free access to this content
    Is my species distribution model fit for purpose? Matching data and models to applications

    Global Ecology and Biogeography

    Volume 24, Issue 3, March 2015, Pages: 276–292, Gurutzeta Guillera-Arroita, José J. Lahoz-Monfort, Jane Elith, Ascelin Gordon, Heini Kujala, Pia E. Lentini, Michael A. McCarthy, Reid Tingley and Brendan A. Wintle

    Version of Record online : 8 JAN 2015, DOI: 10.1111/geb.12268

  4. You have free access to this content
    Imperfect detection impacts the performance of species distribution models

    Global Ecology and Biogeography

    Volume 23, Issue 4, April 2014, Pages: 504–515, José J. Lahoz-Monfort, Gurutzeta Guillera-Arroita and Brendan A. Wintle

    Version of Record online : 29 NOV 2013, DOI: 10.1111/geb.12138

  5. Species distribution modelling and imperfect detection: comparing occupancy versus consensus methods

    Diversity and Distributions

    Volume 19, Issue 8, August 2013, Pages: 996–1007, Lise Comte and Gaël Grenouillet

    Version of Record online : 26 MAR 2013, DOI: 10.1111/ddi.12078

  6. Modelling of species distributions, range dynamics and communities under imperfect detection: advances, challenges and opportunities

    Ecography

    Gurutzeta Guillera-Arroita

    Version of Record online : 26 AUG 2016, DOI: 10.1111/ecog.02445

  7. Does accounting for imperfect detection improve species distribution models?

    Ecography

    Volume 34, Issue 4, August 2011, Pages: 659–670, Christopher T. Rota, Robert J. Fletcher Jr, Jason M. Evans and Richard L. Hutto

    Version of Record online : 19 JAN 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06433.x

  8. Estimating indices of range shifts in birds using dynamic models when detection is imperfect

    Global Change Biology

    Matthew J. Clement, James E. Hines, James D. Nichols, Keith L. Pardieck and David J. Ziolkowski Jr

    Version of Record online : 12 MAY 2016, DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13283

  9. Accommodating species identification errors in transect surveys

    Ecology

    Volume 94, Issue 11, November 2013, Pages: 2607–2618, Paul B. Conn, Brett T. McClintock, Michael F. Cameron, Devin S. Johnson, Erin E. Moreland and Peter L. Boveng

    Version of Record online : 1 NOV 2013, DOI: 10.1890/12-2124.1

  10. You have free access to this content
    Imperfect detection is the rule rather than the exception in plant distribution studies

    Journal of Ecology

    Volume 101, Issue 1, January 2013, Pages: 183–191, Guoke Chen, Marc Kéry, Matthias Plattner, Keping Ma and Beth Gardner

    Version of Record online : 22 NOV 2012, DOI: 10.1111/1365-2745.12021

  11. Analysing and mapping species range dynamics using occupancy models

    Journal of Biogeography

    Volume 40, Issue 8, August 2013, Pages: 1463–1474, Marc Kéry, Gurutzeta Guillera-Arroita and José J. Lahoz-Monfort

    Version of Record online : 21 FEB 2013, DOI: 10.1111/jbi.12087

  12. The importance of incorporating imperfect detection in biodiversity assessments: a case study of small mammals in an Australian region

    Diversity and Distributions

    Volume 17, Issue 4, July 2011, Pages: 613–623, Lesley A. Gibson

    Version of Record online : 21 APR 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00766.x

  13. Evaluating species richness: Biased ecological inference results from spatial heterogeneity in detection probabilities

    Ecological Applications

    Volume 25, Issue 6, September 2015, Pages: 1669–1680, Lance B. Mc New and Colleen M. Handel

    Version of Record online : 1 SEP 2015, DOI: 10.1890/14-1248.1

  14. Penalized likelihood methods improve parameter estimates in occupancy models

    Methods in Ecology and Evolution

    Volume 6, Issue 8, August 2015, Pages: 949–959, Rebecca A. Hutchinson, Jonathon J. Valente, Sarah C. Emerson, Matthew G. Betts and Thomas G. Dietterich

    Version of Record online : 31 MAR 2015, DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.12368

  15. Predicting Species Distributions from Samples Collected along Roadsides

    Conservation Biology

    Volume 26, Issue 1, February 2012, Pages: 68–77, KYLE P. MCCARTHY, ROBERT J. FLETCHER JR, CHRISTOPHER T. ROTA and RICHARD L. HUTTO

    Version of Record online : 19 OCT 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01754.x

  16. Evaluating the predictive abilities of community occupancy models using AUC while accounting for imperfect detection

    Ecological Applications

    Volume 22, Issue 7, October 2012, Pages: 1962–1972, Elise F. Zipkin, Evan H. Campbell Grant and William F. Fagan

    Version of Record online : 1 OCT 2012, DOI: 10.1890/11-1936.1

  17. Improving species occupancy estimation when sampling violates the closure assumption

    Ecography

    Volume 36, Issue 12, December 2013, Pages: 1299–1309, Clint R. V. Otto, Larissa L. Bailey and Gary J. Roloff

    Version of Record online : 25 JUN 2013, DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.00137.x

  18. You have free access to this content
    Importance of sampling design and analysis in animal population studies: a comment on Sergio et al.

    Journal of Applied Ecology

    Volume 45, Issue 3, June 2008, Pages: 981–986, Marc Kéry, J. Andrew Royle and Hans Schmid

    Version of Record online : 7 NOV 2007, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01421.x

  19. How long should we ignore imperfect detection of species in the marine environment when modelling their distribution?

    Fish and Fisheries

    Volume 15, Issue 2, June 2014, Pages: 352–358, Jacquomo Monk

    Version of Record online : 2 APR 2013, DOI: 10.1111/faf.12039

  20. Testing hypotheses on distribution shifts and changes in phenology of imperfectly detectable species

    Methods in Ecology and Evolution

    Volume 6, Issue 6, June 2015, Pages: 638–647, Thierry Chambert, William L. Kendall, James E. Hines, James D. Nichols, Paolo Pedrini, J. Hardin Waddle, Giacomo Tavecchia, Susan C. Walls and Simone Tenan

    Version of Record online : 28 MAR 2015, DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.12362