Search Results

There are 28188 results for: content related to: Functional importance vs keystoneness: Reformulating some questions in theoretical biocenology

  1. Using sensitivity analysis to identify keystone species and keystone links in size-based food webs

    Oikos

    Volume 120, Issue 4, April 2011, Pages: 510–519, Sofia Berg, Maria Christianou, Tomas Jonsson and Bo Ebenman

    Version of Record online : 23 MAR 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18864.x

  2. The Keystone Species Concept: Variation in Interaction Strength in a Rocky Intertidal Habitat

    Ecological Monographs

    Volume 64, Issue 3, February 1994, Pages: 249–286, Bruce A. Menge, Eric L. Berlow, Carol A. Blanchette, Sergio A. Navarrete and Sylvia B. Yamada

    Version of Record online : 1 AUG 1994, DOI: 10.2307/2937163

  3. Keystone species: toward an operational concept for marine biodiversity conservation

    Ecological Monographs

    Volume 85, Issue 1, February 2015, Pages: 29–47, Audrey Valls, Marta Coll and Villy Christensen

    Version of Record online : 1 FEB 2015, DOI: 10.1890/14-0306.1

  4. Use of focal species in marine conservation and management: a review and critique

    Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems

    Volume 11, Issue 1, January/February 2001, Pages: 59–76, Mark A. Zacharias and John C. Roff

    Version of Record online : 21 FEB 2001, DOI: 10.1002/aqc.429

  5. Keystone Predation and Interaction Strength: Interactive Effects of Predators on Their Main Prey

    Ecological Monographs

    Volume 66, Issue 4, February 1996, Pages: 409–429, Sergio A. Navarrete and Bruce A. Menge

    Version of Record online : 1 NOV 1996, DOI: 10.2307/2963488

  6. SOME IMPLICATIONS OF DIRECT POSITIVE INTERACTIONS FOR COMMUNITY SPECIES DIVERSITY

    Ecology

    Volume 78, Issue 7, October 1997, Pages: 1990–2003, Sally D. Hacker and Steven D. Gaines

    Version of Record online : 1 OCT 1997, DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[1990:SIODPI]2.0.CO;2

  7. Keystone species in seed dispersal networks are mainly determined by dietary specialization

    Oikos

    Volume 124, Issue 8, August 2015, Pages: 1031–1039, Marco Aurelio Ribeiro Mello, Francisco Aparecido Rodrigues, Luciano da Fontoura Costa, W. Daniel Kissling, Çağan H. Şekercioğlu, Flavia Maria Darcie Marquitti and Elisabeth Klara Viktoria Kalko

    Version of Record online : 11 DEC 2014, DOI: 10.1111/oik.01613

  8. Biotic and Abiotic Factors that Regulate Communities

    Community Ecotoxicology

    William H. Clements, Michael C. Newman, Pages: 23–60, 2006

    Published Online : 10 MAR 2006, DOI: 10.1002/0470855150.ch2

  9. A Conversation on Refining the Concept of Keystone Species

    Conservation Biology

    Volume 9, Issue 4, August 1995, Pages: 962–964, R.T. Paine

    Version of Record online : 19 JAN 2002, DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1995.09040962.x

  10. The plateau pika (Ochotona curzoniae) is a keystone species for biodiversity on the Tibetan plateau

    Animal Conservation

    Volume 2, Issue 4, November 1999, Pages: 235–240, Andrew T. Smith and J. Marc Foggin

    Version of Record online : 28 FEB 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-1795.1999.tb00069.x

  11. Principles for linking fish habitat to fisheries management and conservation

    Journal of Fish Biology

    Volume 67, Issue sB, December 2005, Pages: 166–185, R. J. Naiman and J. J. Latterell

    Version of Record online : 24 NOV 2005, DOI: 10.1111/j.0022-1112.2005.00921.x

  12. Selecting focal species for marine protected area network planning in the Scotia–Fundy region of Atlantic Canada

    Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems

    Volume 15, Issue 4, July/August 2005, Pages: 367–385, Marty C. King and Karen F. Beazley

    Version of Record online : 23 JUN 2005, DOI: 10.1002/aqc.682

  13. Is there a new keystone species in North American lakes and rivers?

    Oikos

    Volume 91, Issue 2, November 2000, Pages: 405–408, Robert P. Creed

    Version of Record online : 15 APR 2003, DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.910222.x

  14. INTEGRATING BACTERIA INTO FOOD WEBS: STUDIES WITH SARRACENIA PURPUREA INQUILINES

    Ecology

    Volume 79, Issue 3, April 1998, Pages: 880–898, D. Liane Cochran-Stafira and Carl N. von Ende

    Version of Record online : 1 APR 1998, DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[0880:IBIFWS]2.0.CO;2

  15. Complex interactions among mammalian carnivores in Australia, and their implications for wildlife management

    Biological Reviews

    Volume 80, Issue 3, August 2005, Pages: 387–401, Alistair S. Glen and Chris R. Dickman

    Version of Record online : 15 MAR 2007, DOI: 10.1017/S1464793105006718

  16. Conservation and Management of Wild Species

    Applied Ecology and Environmental Management, Second Edition

    Edward I. Newman, Pages: 281–321, 2008

    Published Online : 16 APR 2008, DOI: 10.1002/9780470698723.ch10

  17. Chemical Neuroecology and Community Dynamics

    Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

    Volume 1170, Issue 1, July 2009, Pages: 450–455, Ryan P. Ferrer and Richard K. Zimmer

    Version of Record online : 4 AUG 2009, DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.03908.x

  18. Restructuring of educational systems in the digital age from a co-evolutionary perspective

    Journal of Computer Assisted Learning

    Volume 29, Issue 5, October 2013, Pages: 438–450, N. Davis, B. Eickelmann and P. Zaka

    Version of Record online : 9 SEP 2013, DOI: 10.1111/jcal.12032

  19. Agricultural sustainability does not imply biocenotic sustainability

    Applied Vegetation Science

    Volume 2, Issue 1, May 1999, Pages: 89–94, Andreas Gigon

    Version of Record online : 24 FEB 2009, DOI: 10.2307/1478885

  20. Avoiding Irreversible Change: Considerations for Vegetation Cover, Vegetation Structure and Species Composition

    Managing and Designing Landscapes for Conservation: Moving from Perspectives to Principles

    Joern Fischer, David B. Lindenmayer, Pages: 229–244, 2008

    Published Online : 15 APR 2008, DOI: 10.1002/9780470692400.ch20