Search Results

There are 227652 results for: content related to: Psychological reactions in men screened for prostate cancer

  1. You have free access to this content
    Impact of fecal immunochemical test-based screening programs on proximal and distal colorectal cancer surgery rates: A natural multiple-baseline experiment


    Volume 121, Issue 22, November 15, 2015, Pages: 3982–3989, Ugo Fedeli, Manuel Zorzi, Emanuele D.L. Urso, Nicola Gennaro, Angelo P. Dei Tos and Mario Saugo

    Version of Record online : 11 AUG 2015, DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29623

  2. Is screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm bad for your health and well-being?

    ANZ Journal of Surgery

    Volume 74, Issue 12, December 2004, Pages: 1069–1075, Carole A. Spencer, Paul E. Norman, Konrad Jamrozik, Raywin Tuohy and Michael Lawrence-Brown

    Version of Record online : 1 DEC 2004, DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-1433.2004.03270.x

  3. Computationally inexpensive identification of noninformative model parameters by sequential screening

    Water Resources Research

    Volume 51, Issue 8, August 2015, Pages: 6417–6441, Matthias Cuntz, Juliane Mai, Matthias Zink, Stephan Thober, Rohini Kumar, David Schäfer, Martin Schrön, John Craven, Oldrich Rakovec, Diana Spieler, Vladyslav Prykhodko, Giovanni Dalmasso, Jude Musuuza, Ben Langenberg, Sabine Attinger and Luis Samaniego

    Version of Record online : 16 AUG 2015, DOI: 10.1002/2015WR016907

  4. Women's experiences of being screened for gestational diabetes mellitus

    Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

    Volume 42, Issue 2, April 2002, Pages: 131–137, Alice R Rumbold and Caroline A Crowther

    Version of Record online : 28 OCT 2004, DOI: 10.1111/j.0004-8666.2002.00131.x

  5. You have free access to this content
    Healthcare use after screening for lung cancer


    Volume 116, Issue 20, 15 October 2010, Pages: 4793–4799, Margaret M. Byrne, Tulay Koru-Sengul, Wei Zhao, Joel L. Weissfeld and Mark S. Roberts

    Version of Record online : 1 JUL 2010, DOI: 10.1002/cncr.25466

  6. You have free access to this content
    Trends in breast biopsy pathology diagnoses among women undergoing mammography in the United States: A report from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium


    Volume 121, Issue 9, May 1, 2015, Pages: 1369–1378, Kimberly H. Allison, Linn A. Abraham, Donald L. Weaver, Anna N. A. Tosteson, Heidi D. Nelson, Tracy Onega, Berta M. Geller, Karla Kerlikowske, Patricia A. Carney, Laura E. Ichikawa, Diana S. M. Buist and Joann G. Elmore

    Version of Record online : 20 JAN 2015, DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29199

  7. The psychological impact of mammographic screening. A systematic review


    Volume 14, Issue 11, November 2005, Pages: 917–938, J. Brett, C. Bankhead, B. Henderson, E. Watson and J. Austoker

    Version of Record online : 22 MAR 2005, DOI: 10.1002/pon.904

  8. You have free access to this content
    A novel case–control design to estimate the extent of over-diagnosis of breast cancer due to organised population-based mammography screening

    International Journal of Cancer

    Volume 136, Issue 6, 15 March 2015, Pages: 1411–1421, Kerri R. Beckmann, John W. Lynch, Janet E. Hiller, Gelareh Farshid, Nehmat Houssami, Stephen W. Duffy and David M. Roder

    Version of Record online : 18 AUG 2014, DOI: 10.1002/ijc.29124

  9. Risk perception of participants in a family-based genetic screening program on familial hypercholesterolemia

    American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A

    Volume 116A, Issue 2, 15 January 2003, Pages: 136–143, M.C. van Maarle, M.E.A. Stouthard and G.J. Bonsel

    Version of Record online : 19 DEC 2002, DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.10061

  10. Predictors of anxiety and depression among people attending diabetes screening: A prospective cohort study embedded in the ADDITION (Cambridge) randomized control trial

    British Journal of Health Psychology

    Volume 16, Issue 1, February 2011, Pages: 213–226, C. A. M. Paddison, H. C. Eborall, D. P. French, A. L. Kinmonth, A. T. Prevost, S. J. Griffin and S. Sutton

    Version of Record online : 12 JAN 2011, DOI: 10.1348/135910710X495366

  11. Alternative definitions of comparable case groups and estimates of lead time and benefit time in randomized cancer screening trials

    Statistics in Medicine

    Volume 22, Issue 1, 15 January 2003, Pages: 83–111, Karen Kafadar and Philip C. Prorok

    Version of Record online : 11 DEC 2002, DOI: 10.1002/sim.1331

  12. Long-Term Effectiveness of Screening for Hearing Loss: The Screening for Auditory Impairment—Which Hearing Assessment Test (SAI-WHAT) Randomized Trial

    Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

    Volume 58, Issue 3, March 2010, Pages: 427–434, Bevan Yueh, Margaret P. Collins, Pamela E. Souza, Edward J. Boyko, Carl F. Loovis, Patrick J. Heagerty, Chuan-Fen Liu and Susan C. Hedrick

    Version of Record online : 11 MAR 2010, DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02738.x

  13. You have free access to this content
    Consequences of Screening in Lung Cancer: Development and Dimensionality of a Questionnaire

    Value in Health

    Volume 13, Issue 5, August 2010, Pages: 601–612, John Brodersen, Hanne Thorsen and Svend Kreiner

    Version of Record online : 12 MAR 2010, DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2010.00697.x

  14. The Effectiveness of Health Screening

    Health Economics

    Volume 24, Issue 8, August 2015, Pages: 913–935, Franz Hackl, Martin Halla, Michael Hummer and Gerald J. Pruckner

    Version of Record online : 18 JUL 2014, DOI: 10.1002/hec.3072

  15. You have free access to this content
    Randomized clinical trial of standard dietary treatment versus a low-carbohydrate/high-protein diet or the LighterLife Programme in the management of obesity

    Journal of Diabetes

    Volume 1, Issue 3, September 2009, Pages: 207–217, Catherine ROLLAND, Michelle HESSION, Susan MURRAY, Alan WISE and Iain BROOM

    Version of Record online : 26 JUN 2009, DOI: 10.1111/j.1753-0407.2009.00033.x

    Corrected by:


    Vol. 3, Issue 4, 356, Version of Record online: 25 NOV 2011

  16. Community screening for visual impairment in the elderly

    Intervention Review

    The Cochrane Library

    Liam L Smeeth and Steve Iliffe

    Published Online : 19 JUL 2006, DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001054.pub2

  17. Factors associated with receiving treatment for dental decay among Medicaid-enrolled children younger than 12 years of age in Iowa, 2010

    Journal of Public Health Dentistry

    Volume 75, Issue 1, Winter 2015, Pages: 17–23, Leah Zilversmit, Debra J. Kane, Roger Rochat, Tracy Rodgers and Bob Russell

    Version of Record online : 6 AUG 2014, DOI: 10.1111/jphd.12066

  18. Effects of gestational age at enrollment in pregnancy exposure registries

    Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety

    Volume 24, Issue 4, April 2015, Pages: 343–352, Andrea V. Margulis, Murray A. Mittleman, Robert J. Glynn, Lewis B. Holmes and Sonia Hernández-Díaz

    Version of Record online : 20 FEB 2015, DOI: 10.1002/pds.3731

  19. You have free access to this content
    Lung cancer screening results in the National Cancer Institute New York Study


    Volume 89, Issue S11, 1 December 2000, Pages: 2356–2362, Myron R. Melamed

    Version of Record online : 7 DEC 2000, DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(20001201)89:11+<2356::AID-CNCR8>3.0.CO;2-Z

  20. Community-based screening for hepatocellular carcinoma in elderly residents in a hepatitis B- and C-endemic area

    Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology

    Volume 26, Issue 1, January 2011, Pages: 129–134, Yen-Chieh Huang, Chih-Fang Huang, Kuo-Chin Chang, Shu-Fen Hung, Jing-Houng Wang, Chao-Hung Hung, Chien-Hung Chen, Po-Lin Tseng, Kwong-Ming Kee, Yi-Hao Yen, Pei-Shan Tsai, Chin-Chen Tsai and Sheng-Nan Lu

    Version of Record online : 22 DEC 2010, DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2010.06476.x