Search Results

There are 27539 results for: content related to: Prognostic G leason grade grouping: data based on the modified G leason scoring system

  1. You have free access to this content
    Disease-specific death and metastasis do not occur in patients with Gleason score ≤6 at radical prostatectomy

    BJU International

    Volume 116, Issue 2, August 2015, Pages: 230–235, Charlotte F. Kweldam, Mark F. Wildhagen, Chris H. Bangma and Geert J.L.H. van Leenders

    Version of Record online : 7 MAR 2015, DOI: 10.1111/bju.12879

  2. You have free access to this content
    Gleason inflation 1998–2011: a registry study of 97 168 men

    BJU International

    Volume 115, Issue 2, February 2015, Pages: 248–255, Daniela Danneman, Linda Drevin, David Robinson, Pär Stattin and Lars Egevad

    Version of Record online : 21 JAN 2015, DOI: 10.1111/bju.12671

  3. Gleason grading: past, present and future

    Histopathology

    Volume 60, Issue 1, January 2012, Pages: 75–86, Brett Delahunt, Rose J Miller, John R Srigley, Andrew J Evans and Hemamali Samaratunga

    Version of Record online : 23 DEC 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2011.04003.x

  4. You have free access to this content
    Prognostic Gleason grade grouping: data based on the modified Gleason scoring system

    BJU International

    Volume 111, Issue 5, May 2013, Pages: 753–760, Phillip M. Pierorazio, Patrick C. Walsh, Alan W. Partin and Jonathan I. Epstein

    Version of Record online : 6 MAR 2013, DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11611.x

  5. SOCS3 Immunohistochemical Expression Seems to Support the 2005 and 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Modified Gleason Grading System

    The Prostate

    Volume 77, Issue 6, May 1, 2017, Pages: 597–603, Francesco Pierconti, Maurizio Martini, Tonia Cenci, Gian Luigi Petrone, Riccardo Ricci, Emilio Sacco, Pier Francesco Bassi and Luigi Maria Larocca

    Version of Record online : 1 FEB 2017, DOI: 10.1002/pros.23299

  6. You have free access to this content
    Comparison of Japanese General Rules of Prostatic Cancer and Gleason grading system

    International Journal of Urology

    Volume 8, Issue 10, October 2001, Pages: 539–545, Takashi Fukagai, Thomas Namiki, Robert G. Carlile, So Sugawara, Masashi Morita, Makoto Shimada, Hideki Yoshida and Hideo Namiki

    Version of Record online : 7 JUL 2008, DOI: 10.1046/j.1442-2042.2001.00368.x

  7. miRNAs dysregulated in association with Gleason grade regulate extracellular matrix, cytoskeleton and androgen receptor pathways

    The Journal of Pathology

    Volume 237, Issue 2, October 2015, Pages: 226–237, Zsuzsanna Lichner, Qiang Ding, Sara Samaan, Carol Saleh, Aurfan Nasser, Sahar Al-Haddad, Joseph N Samuel, Neil E Fleshner, Carsten Stephan, Klaus Jung and George M Yousef

    Version of Record online : 24 JUL 2015, DOI: 10.1002/path.4568

  8. You have free access to this content
    Gleason grading of prostate cancer in needle biopsies or radical prostatectomy specimens: contemporary approach, current clinical significance and sources of pathology discrepancies

    BJU International

    Volume 95, Issue 8, June 2005, Pages: 1146–1152, Rodolfo Montironi, Roberta Mazzuccheli, Marina Scarpelli, Antonio Lopez-Beltran, Giovanni Fellegara and Ferran Algaba

    Version of Record online : 6 MAY 2005, DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05540.x

  9. You have free access to this content
    Prognostic significance of histologic grading in patients with prostate carcinoma who are assessed by the Gleason and World Health Organization grading systems in needle biopsies obtained prior to radiotherapy

    Cancer

    Volume 92, Issue 2, 15 July 2001, Pages: 311–319, Wolfgang Lilleby, Goran Torlakovic, Emina Torlakovic, Eva Skovlund and Sophie D. Fosså

    Version of Record online : 16 JUL 2001, DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(20010715)92:2<311::AID-CNCR1324>3.0.CO;2-H

  10. You have free access to this content
    The impact of the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus guidelines on Gleason grading – a matched-pair analysis

    BJU International

    Volume 117, Issue 6, June 2016, Pages: 883–889, Kasper D. Berg, Frederik B. Thomsen, Camilla Nerstrøm, Martin A. Røder, Peter Iversen, Birgitte G. Toft, Ben Vainer and Klaus Brasso

    Version of Record online : 22 FEB 2016, DOI: 10.1111/bju.13439

  11. You have free access to this content
    Epstein criteria for insignificant prostate cancer

    BJU International

    Volume 108, Issue 4, August 2011, Pages: 518–525, Sheng F. Oon, R. William Watson, John J. O’Leary and John M. Fitzpatrick

    Version of Record online : 14 FEB 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.09979.x

  12. You have free access to this content
    The quantitative Gleason score improves prostate cancer risk assessment

    Cancer

    Volume 118, Issue 24, 15 December 2012, Pages: 6046–6054, Adam C. Reese, Janet E. Cowan, Jonathan S. Brajtbord, Catherine R. Harris, Peter R. Carroll and Matthew R. Cooperberg

    Version of Record online : 6 JUN 2012, DOI: 10.1002/cncr.27670

  13. You have free access to this content
    Gleason score concordance on biopsy-confirmed prostate cancer: is pathological re-evaluation necessary prior to radical prostatectomy?

    BJU International

    Volume 107, Issue 5, March 2011, Pages: 749–754, Matthew D. Truesdale, Philippa J. Cheetham, Andrew T. Turk, Samantha Sartori, Gregory W. Hruby, Eion P. Dinneen, Mitchell C. Benson and Ketan K. Badani

    Version of Record online : 14 SEP 2010, DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09570.x

  14. Frequency and determinants of disagreement and error in gleason scores: A population-based study of prostate cancer

    The Prostate

    Volume 72, Issue 13, 15 September 2012, Pages: 1389–1398, Michael Goodman, Kevin C. Ward, Adeboye O. Osunkoya, Milton W. Datta, Daniel Luthringer, Andrew N. Young, Katerina Marks, Vaunita Cohen, Jan C. Kennedy, Michael J. Haber and Mahul B. Amin

    Version of Record online : 6 JAN 2012, DOI: 10.1002/pros.22484

  15. You have free access to this content
    Combined histoarchitectural and cytological biopsy grading improves grading accuracy in low-grade prostate cancer

    International Journal of Urology

    Volume 19, Issue 2, February 2012, Pages: 126–133, Burkhard Helpap and Jens Köllermann

    Version of Record online : 22 NOV 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2011.02902.x

  16. Metastatic potential to regional lymph nodes with Gleason score ≤7, including tertiary pattern 5, at radical prostatectomy

    BJU International

    Volume 119, Issue 6, June 2017, Pages: 872–878, Mairo L. Diolombi and Jonathan I. Epstein

    Version of Record online : 2 SEP 2016, DOI: 10.1111/bju.13623

  17. You have free access to this content
    Accuracy of prostate biopsies for predicting Gleason score in radical prostatectomy specimens: nationwide trends 2000–2012

    BJU International

    Volume 119, Issue 1, January 2017, Pages: 50–56, Daniela Danneman, Linda Drevin, Brett Delahunt, Hemamali Samaratunga, David Robinson, Ola Bratt, Stacy Loeb, Pär Stattin and Lars Egevad

    Version of Record online : 24 MAR 2016, DOI: 10.1111/bju.13458

  18. You have free access to this content
    Recent advances in prostate cancer pathology: Gleason grading and beyond

    Pathology International

    Volume 66, Issue 5, May 2016, Pages: 260–272, Rajal B Shah and Ming Zhou

    Version of Record online : 18 MAR 2016, DOI: 10.1111/pin.12398

  19. Whole-lesion apparent diffusion coefficient metrics as a marker of percentage Gleason 4 component within Gleason 7 prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy

    Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

    Volume 41, Issue 3, March 2015, Pages: 708–714, Andrew B. Rosenkrantz, Michael J. Triolo, Jonathan Melamed, Henry Rusinek, Samir S. Taneja and Fang-Ming Deng

    Version of Record online : 25 FEB 2014, DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24598

  20. You have free access to this content
    Concordance between Gleason scores of needle biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens: a population-based study

    BJU International

    Volume 103, Issue 12, June 2009, Pages: 1647–1654, Rune Kvåle, Bjørn Møller, Rolf Wahlqvist, Sophie D. Fosså, Aasmund Berner, Christer Busch, Anne E. Kyrdalen, Aud Svindland, Trond Viset and Ole J. Halvorsen

    Version of Record online : 22 DEC 2008, DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08255.x