Search Results

There are 7808 results for: content related to: DIRECT TESTS OF INDIVIDUAL PREFERENCES FOR EFFICIENCY AND EQUITY

  1. Testing Social Preferences for an Economic “Bad”: An Artefactual Field Experiment

    The Scandinavian Journal of Economics

    Volume 115, Issue 1, January 2013, Pages: 27–61, Deborah Kerley Keisner, Kent D. Messer, William D. Schulze and Homa Zarghamee

    Version of Record online : 18 JAN 2013, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9442.2012.01745.x

  2. Contra Private Fairness

    American Journal of Economics and Sociology

    Volume 71, Issue 2, April 2012, Pages: 407–435, BART J. WILSON

    Version of Record online : 4 APR 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1536-7150.2012.00836.x

  3. IDENTIFYING SOCIAL NORMS USING COORDINATION GAMES: WHY DOES DICTATOR GAME SHARING VARY?

    Journal of the European Economic Association

    Volume 11, Issue 3, June 2013, Pages: 495–524, Erin L. Krupka and Roberto A. Weber

    Version of Record online : 3 JUN 2013, DOI: 10.1111/jeea.12006

  4. Revealed Altruism

    Econometrica

    Volume 76, Issue 1, January 2008, Pages: 31–69, James C. Cox, Daniel Friedman and Vjollca Sadiraj

    Version of Record online : 19 FEB 2008, DOI: 10.1111/j.0012-9682.2008.00817.x

  5. To Give or Not to Give: Children’s and Adolescents’ Sharing and Moral Negotiations in Economic Decision Situations

    Child Development

    Volume 79, Issue 3, May/June 2008, Pages: 562–576, Michaela Gummerum, Monika Keller, Masanori Takezawa and Jutta Mata

    Version of Record online : 16 MAY 2008, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01143.x

  6. PEER EFFECTS IN PRO-SOCIAL BEHAVIOR: SOCIAL NORMS OR SOCIAL PREFERENCES?

    Journal of the European Economic Association

    Volume 11, Issue 3, June 2013, Pages: 548–573, Simon Gächter, Daniele Nosenzo and Martin Sefton

    Version of Record online : 3 JUN 2013, DOI: 10.1111/jeea.12015

  7. Social Preferences in the Lab: A Comparison of Students and a Representative Population

    The Scandinavian Journal of Economics

    Volume 117, Issue 4, October 2015, Pages: 1306–1326, Alexander W. Cappelen, Knut Nygaard, Erik Ø. Sørensen and Bertil Tungodden

    Version of Record online : 6 MAY 2015, DOI: 10.1111/sjoe.12114

  8. A LABORATORY STUDY OF GROUP POLARISATION IN THE TEAM DICTATOR GAME

    The Economic Journal

    Volume 107, Issue 444, September 1997, Pages: 1465–1483, Timothy N. Cason and Vai-Lam Mui

    Version of Record online : 27 JAN 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.1997.tb00058.x

  9. Do Participants and Observers Assess Intentions Differently During Bargaining and Conflict?

    American Journal of Political Science

    Volume 53, Issue 4, October 2009, Pages: 910–930, Eric S. Dickson

    Version of Record online : 18 SEP 2009, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00408.x

  10. You have full text access to this Open Access content
    Ashamed to be selfish

    Theoretical Economics

    Volume 7, Issue 1, January 2012, Pages: 99–124, David Dillenberger and Philipp Sadowski

    Version of Record online : 10 JAN 2012, DOI: 10.3982/TE674

  11. WHEN YOU ASK ZEUS A FAVOR: THE THIRD PARTY'S VOICE IN A DICTATOR GAME

    The Japanese Economic Review

    Volume 61, Issue 2, June 2010, Pages: 145–158, TETSUO YAMAMORI, KAZUHIKO KATO and AKIHIKO MATSUI

    Version of Record online : 20 MAR 2009, DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5876.2009.00482.x

  12. You have free access to this content
    Individual differences in allocation of funds in the dictator game associated with length of the arginine vasopressin 1a receptor RS3 promoter region and correlation between RS3 length and hippocampal mRNA

    Genes, Brain and Behavior

    Volume 7, Issue 3, April 2008, Pages: 266–275, A. Knafo, S. Israel, A. Darvasi, R. Bachner-Melman, F. Uzefovsky, L. Cohen, E. Feldman, E. Lerer, E. Laiba, Y. Raz, L. Nemanov, I. Gritsenko, C. Dina, G. Agam, , B. Dean, G. Bornstein and R. P. Ebstein,,

    Version of Record online : 7 JUL 2007, DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2007.00341.x

  13. Reciprocity and Giving in a Consecutive Three-Person Dictator Game with Social Interaction

    German Economic Review

    Volume 15, Issue 3, August 2014, Pages: 374–392, Gunter Bahr and Till Requate

    Version of Record online : 27 MAR 2013, DOI: 10.1111/geer.12013

  14. Asymmetric Information in Simple Bargaining Games: An Experimental Study

    German Economic Review

    Charlotte Klempt, Kerstin Pull and Manfred Stadler

    Version of Record online : 27 JUN 2017, DOI: 10.1111/geer.12138

  15. Justice and Fairness in the Dictator Game

    Southern Economic Journal

    Volume 76, Issue 1, July 2009, Pages: 130–145, Karl Schurter and Bart J. Wilson

    Version of Record online : 1 JUL 2009, DOI: 10.4284/sej.2009.76.1.130

  16. AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON THE RELEVANCE AND SCOPE OF NATIONALITY AS A COORDINATION DEVICE

    Economic Inquiry

    Volume 52, Issue 4, October 2014, Pages: 1392–1407, OLGA STODDARD and ANDREAS LEIBBRANDT

    Version of Record online : 20 MAY 2014, DOI: 10.1111/ecin.12097

  17. Individual Differences in Good Manners Rather Than Compassion Predict Fair Allocations of Wealth in the Dictator Game

    Journal of Personality

    Volume 85, Issue 2, April 2017, Pages: 244–256, Kun Zhao, Eamonn Ferguson and Luke D. Smillie

    Version of Record online : 8 FEB 2016, DOI: 10.1111/jopy.12237

  18. Contagion of Self-Interested Behavior: Evidence from Group Dictator Game Experiments

    German Economic Review

    Volume 17, Issue 4, November 2016, Pages: 425–437, Takehiro Ito, Kazuhito Ogawa, Akihiro Suzuki, Hiromasa Takahashi and Toru Takemoto

    Version of Record online : 24 SEP 2015, DOI: 10.1111/geer.12077

  19. ON THE NATURE OF RECIPROCAL MOTIVES

    Economic Inquiry

    Volume 43, Issue 3, July 2005, Pages: 623–635, JAMES C. COX and CARY A. DECK

    Version of Record online : 26 MAR 2007, DOI: 10.1093/ei/cbi043

  20. WHEN ARE WOMEN MORE GENEROUS THAN MEN?

    Economic Inquiry

    Volume 44, Issue 4, October 2006, Pages: 587–598, JAMES C. COX and CARY A. DECK

    Version of Record online : 2 APR 2007, DOI: 10.1093/ei/cbj042