Search Results

There are 23608 results for: content related to: CARTEL DAMAGES CLAIMS AND THE PASSING-ON DEFENSE *

  1. OPTIMAL CORPORATE LENIENCY PROGRAMS

    The Journal of Industrial Economics

    Volume 56, Issue 2, June 2008, Pages: 215–246, JOSEPH E. HARRINGTON JR

    Version of Record online : 8 JUL 2008, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6451.2008.00339.x

  2. QUALITY DISCLOSURE AND COMPETITION

    The Journal of Industrial Economics

    Volume 57, Issue 1, March 2009, Pages: 167–196, DAN LEVIN, JAMES PECK and LIXIN YE

    Version of Record online : 20 FEB 2009, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6451.2009.00366.x

  3. COLLUSION IN THE PRESENCE OF EXTERNALITIES

    The Journal of Industrial Economics

    Volume 55, Issue 3, September 2007, Pages: 475–497, KI-EUN RHEE

    Version of Record online : 10 SEP 2007, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6451.2007.00320.x

  4. MEASURING THE TRUE HARM FROM PRICE-FIXING TO BOTH DIRECT AND INDIRECT PURCHASERS

    The Journal of Industrial Economics

    Volume 58, Issue 4, December 2010, Pages: 895–927, LEONARDO J. BASSO and THOMAS W. ROSS

    Version of Record online : 24 DEC 2010, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6451.2010.00437.x

  5. Illegal Cartel Overcharges in Markets with a Legal Cartel History: Bitumen Prices in South Africa

    South African Journal of Economics

    Volume 83, Issue 2, June 2015, Pages: 220–239, Willem H. Boshoff

    Version of Record online : 21 NOV 2014, DOI: 10.1111/saje.12074

  6. OUTPUT-EXPANDING COLLUSION IN THE PRESENCE OF A COMPETITIVE FRINGE

    The Journal of Industrial Economics

    Volume 58, Issue 1, March 2010, Pages: 106–126, JUAN-PABLO MONTERO and JUAN IGNACIO GUZMAN

    Version of Record online : 1 MAR 2010, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6451.2010.00410.x

  7. OPTIMAL AUCTIONS WHEN A SELLER IS BOUND TO SELL TO COLLUSIVE BIDDERS

    The Journal of Industrial Economics

    Volume 57, Issue 4, December 2009, Pages: 835–850, NICOLAS GRUYER

    Version of Record online : 24 NOV 2009, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6451.2009.00397.x

  8. Endogenous cartel formation with heterogeneous firms

    The RAND Journal of Economics

    Volume 41, Issue 1, Spring 2010, Pages: 92–117, Iwan Bos and Joseph E. Harrington, Jr

    Version of Record online : 20 JAN 2010, DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-2171.2009.00091.x

  9. Cartel Detection in Procurement Markets

    Managerial and Decision Economics

    Volume 35, Issue 6, September 2014, Pages: 404–422, Kai Hüschelrath and Tobias Veith

    Version of Record online : 1 JUL 2013, DOI: 10.1002/mde.2631

  10. Multi-Market Collusion with Demand Linkages and Antitrust Enforcement

    The Journal of Industrial Economics

    Volume 61, Issue 4, December 2013, Pages: 987–1022, Jay Pil Choi and Heiko Gerlach

    Version of Record online : 29 DEC 2013, DOI: 10.1111/joie.12041

  11. COMPETITION POLICY AND CARTEL SIZE

    International Economic Review

    Volume 56, Issue 1, February 2015, Pages: 133–153, Iwan Bos and Joseph E. Harrington

    Version of Record online : 23 JAN 2015, DOI: 10.1111/iere.12097

  12. You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article
    Antitrust Penalties and the Implications of Empirical Evidence on Cartel Overcharges

    The Economic Journal

    Volume 123, Issue 572, November 2013, Pages: F558–F581, Yannis Katsoulacos and David Ulph

    Version of Record online : 19 NOV 2013, DOI: 10.1111/ecoj.12075

  13. Illinois Walls: how barring indirect purchaser suits facilitates collusion

    The RAND Journal of Economics

    Volume 39, Issue 3, Autumn 2008, Pages: 683–698, Maarten Pieter Schinkel, Jan Tuinstra and Jakob Rüggeberg

    Version of Record online : 16 SEP 2008, DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-2171.2008.00034.x

  14. Buying Negative Agenda Control in the U.S. House

    American Journal of Political Science

    Volume 56, Issue 4, October 2012, Pages: 897–912, Jeffery A. Jenkins and Nathan W. Monroe

    Version of Record online : 3 MAY 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00593.x

  15. OPTIMAL CARTEL PRICING IN THE PRESENCE OF AN ANTITRUST AUTHORITY

    International Economic Review

    Volume 46, Issue 1, February 2005, Pages: 145–169, Joseph E. Harrington Jr .

    Version of Record online : 3 FEB 2005, DOI: 10.1111/j.0020-6598.2005.00313.x

  16. The Prodigal Corporation: an Analysis on the Effectiveness of the ACCC's Immunity Policy for Cartel Conduct

    Australian Economic Papers

    Volume 52, Issue 1, March 2013, Pages: 38–51, Anthony Gray, Bonnie T. Nguyen and Andrew Wait

    Version of Record online : 11 JUN 2013, DOI: 10.1111/1467-8454.12006

  17. The Effect of Explicit Communication on pricing: Evidence from the Collapse of a Gasoline Cartel

    The Journal of Industrial Economics

    Volume 62, Issue 2, June 2014, Pages: 191–228, Robert Clark and Jean-François Houde

    Version of Record online : 4 JUN 2014, DOI: 10.1111/joie.12042

  18. fines, leniency, and rewards in antitrust

    The RAND Journal of Economics

    Volume 43, Issue 2, Summer 2012, Pages: 368–390, Maria Bigoni, Sven-Olof Fridolfsson, Chloé Le Coq and Giancarlo Spagnolo

    Version of Record online : 19 JUN 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-2171.2012.00170.x

  19. Section 47 of the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013: A Flawed Reform of the UK Cartel Offence

    The Modern Law Review

    Volume 78, Issue 3, May 2015, Pages: 493–521, Dr Peter Whelan

    Version of Record online : 1 MAY 2015, DOI: 10.1111/1468-2230.12125

  20. THE EFFECTS OF LENIENCY PROGRAMS AND FINES ON CARTEL STABILITY

    Metroeconomica

    Volume 58, Issue 2, May 2007, Pages: 231–243, Ankur Chavda and Marc Jegers

    Version of Record online : 17 APR 2007, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-999X.2007.00266.x