Search Results

There are 158203 results for: content related to: The use of conjoint analysis to elicit community preferences in public health research: a case study of hospital services in South Australia

  1. EXPECTATIONS AND ACCEPTABILITY OF DIABETIC AND REDUCED-CALORIE MILK CHOCOLATES AMONG NONDIABETICS AND DIABETICS IN THE U.S.A.

    Journal of Sensory Studies

    Volume 25, Issue s1, July 2010, Pages: 133–152, LAURO MELO, JESSICA L. CHILDS, MARYANNE DRAKE, HELENA MARIA ANDRÉ BOLINI and PRISCILLA EFRAIM

    Version of Record online : 28 APR 2010, DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-459X.2010.00291.x

  2. You have free access to this content
    Research Podium Abstracts

    Value in Health

    Volume 12, Issue 3, May 2009, Pages: A1–A19,

    Version of Record online : 15 APR 2009, DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00537_1.x

  3. You have free access to this content
    RESEARCH POSTER ABSTRACTS

    Value in Health

    Volume 13, Issue 7, November 2010, Pages: A250–A480,

    Version of Record online : 11 OCT 2010, DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2010.00791_2.x

  4. You have free access to this content
    RESEARCH PODIUM ABSTRACTS

    Value in Health

    Volume 12, Issue 7, October 2009, Pages: A221–A237,

    Version of Record online : 15 SEP 2009, DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00592_1.x

    Corrected by:

    Erratum

    Vol. 13, Issue 2, 335, Version of Record online: 17 DEC 2009

  5. Can Eye-Tracking Techniques Overcome a Limitation of Conjoint Analysis? Case Study on Healthfulness Perception of Yogurt Labels

    Journal of Sensory Studies

    Volume 28, Issue 5, October 2013, Pages: 370–380, Leticia Vidal, Lucía Antúnez, Alejandra Sapolinski, Ana Giménez, Alejandro Maiche and Gastón Ares

    Version of Record online : 16 OCT 2013, DOI: 10.1111/joss.12062

  6. You have full text access to this Open Access content
    Using conjoint analysis to elicit the views of health service users: an application to the patient health card

    Health Expectations

    Volume 1, Issue 2, November 1998, Pages: 117–129, Mandy Ryan, Emma McIntosh and Phil Shackley

    Version of Record online : 4 JAN 2002, DOI: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.1998.00024.x

  7. You have free access to this content
    RESEARCH PODIUM ABSTRACTS

    Value in Health

    Volume 13, Issue 7, November 2010, Pages: A239–A250,

    Version of Record online : 11 OCT 2010, DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2010.00791_1.x

  8. An empirical comparison of three variants of the AHP and two variants of conjoint analysis

    Journal of Behavioral Decision Making

    Volume 11, Issue 4, December 1998, Pages: 263–280, Rajendra Mulye

    Version of Record online : 4 DEC 1998, DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(1998120)11:4<263::AID-BDM301>3.0.CO;2-T

  9. Preferences for hospital quality in Zambia: results from a discrete choice experiment

    Health Economics

    Volume 14, Issue 7, July 2005, Pages: 687–701, Kara Hanson, Barbara McPake, Pamela Nakamba and Luke Archard

    Version of Record online : 24 DEC 2004, DOI: 10.1002/hec.959

  10. Conjoint analysis. The cost variable: an Achilles' heel?

    Health Economics

    Volume 12, Issue 6, June 2003, Pages: 479–491, Ulla Slothuus Skjoldborg and Dorte Gyrd-Hansen

    Version of Record online : 2 AUG 2002, DOI: 10.1002/hec.742

  11. You have free access to this content
    Gender and Computer Games: Exploring Females’ Dislikes

    Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication

    Volume 11, Issue 4, July 2006, Pages: 910–931, Tilo Hartmann and Christoph Klimmt

    Version of Record online : 9 OCT 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00301.x

  12. A Demonstration of Conjoint Analysis for Organizational Research

    International Journal of Selection and Assessment

    Volume 4, Issue 1, January 1996, Pages: 35–43, Paul M. Muchinsky and Norman J. Hoffman

    Version of Record online : 3 APR 2007, DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2389.1996.tb00046.x

  13. Creating new product concepts for foodservice – the role of conjoint measurement to identify promising product features

    Food Service Technology

    Volume 1, Issue 1, March 2001, Pages: 35–52, Howard Moskowitz

    Version of Record online : 28 JUN 2008, DOI: 10.1046/j.1471-5740.2001.00004.x

  14. The Internal Validity of the Trade-Off Method of Conjoint Analysis

    Decision Sciences

    Volume 20, Issue 3, September 1989, Pages: 451–461, M. Hossein Safizadeh

    Version of Record online : 8 JUN 2007, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1989.tb01560.x

  15. APPLICATION OF ETHNOGRAPHY AND CONJOINT ANALYSIS TO DETERMINE KEY CONSUMER ATTRIBUTES FOR LATTE-STYLE COFFEE BEVERAGES

    Journal of Sensory Studies

    Volume 27, Issue 1, February 2012, Pages: 48–58, S.M. JERVIS, K. LOPETCHARAT and M.A. DRAKE

    Version of Record online : 10 JAN 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-459X.2011.00366.x

  16. CONSUMER ACCEPTANCE OF FOOD BARS

    Journal of Sensory Studies

    Volume 25, Issue s1, July 2010, Pages: 153–170, K. MAHANNA and S.Y. LEE

    Version of Record online : 19 MAR 2010, DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-459X.2009.00263.x

  17. You have free access to this content
    Conjoint Analysis

    Standard Article

    Wiley International Encyclopedia of Marketing

    Vithala R. Rao

    Published Online : 15 DEC 2010, DOI: 10.1002/9781444316568.wiem02019

  18. Conjoint Analysis Plus (Cross Category, Emotions, Pricing and Beyond)

    Product Innovation Toolbox: A Field Guide to Consumer Understanding and Research

    Daniel Moskowitz, Howard Moskowitz, Pages: 192–223, 2012

    Published Online : 27 FEB 2012, DOI: 10.1002/9781118229248.ch7a

  19. Methodological issues in the application of conjoint analysis in health care

    Health Economics

    Volume 7, Issue 4, June 1998, Pages: 373–378, Mandy Ryan, Emma McIntosh and Phil Shackley

    Version of Record online : 4 DEC 1998, DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199806)7:4<373::AID-HEC348>3.0.CO;2-J

  20. Using Conjoint Analysis to Assess Women's Preferences for Miscarriage Management

    Health Economics

    Volume 6, Issue 3, May 1997, Pages: 261–273, Mandy Ryan and Jenny Hughes

    Version of Record online : 4 DEC 1998, DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199705)6:3<261::AID-HEC262>3.0.CO;2-N