Search Results

There are 100120 results for: content related to: GETTING MORAL ENHANCEMENT RIGHT: THE DESIRABILITY OF MORAL BIOENHANCEMENT

  1. On Cognitive and Moral Enhancement: A Reply to Savulescu and Persson

    Bioethics

    Volume 29, Issue 3, March 2015, Pages: 153–161, J. Adam Carter and Emma C. Gordon

    Version of Record online : 23 DEC 2013, DOI: 10.1111/bioe.12076

  2. You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article
    MORAL ENHANCEMENT AND FREEDOM

    Bioethics

    Volume 25, Issue 2, February 2011, Pages: 102–111, JOHN HARRIS

    Version of Record online : 7 DEC 2010, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01854.x

  3. Moral Bioenhancement: Much Ado About Nothing?

    Bioethics

    Volume 29, Issue 4, May 2015, Pages: 223–232, Inmaculada de Melo-Martin and Arleen Salles

    Version of Record online : 9 JUN 2014, DOI: 10.1111/bioe.12100

  4. Better Living Through Chemistry? A Reply to Savulescu and Persson on ‘Moral Enhancement’

    Journal of Applied Philosophy

    Volume 31, Issue 1, February 2014, Pages: 23–32, Robert Sparrow

    Version of Record online : 25 AUG 2013, DOI: 10.1111/japp.12038

  5. Preventing Ultimate Harm as the Justification for Biomoral Modification

    Bioethics

    Volume 29, Issue 5, June 2015, Pages: 369–377, Timothy F. Murphy

    Version of Record online : 3 SEP 2014, DOI: 10.1111/bioe.12108

  6. Conceptual and Practical Problems of Moral Enhancement

    Bioethics

    Volume 29, Issue 4, May 2015, Pages: 233–240, Birgit Beck

    Version of Record online : 24 MAR 2014, DOI: 10.1111/bioe.12090

  7. Intelligence, Wellbeing and Procreative Beneficence

    Journal of Applied Philosophy

    Volume 30, Issue 2, May 2013, Pages: 122–135, J. Adam Carter and Emma C. Gordon

    Version of Record online : 11 MAR 2013, DOI: 10.1111/japp.12011

  8. A Not-So-New Eugenics

    Hastings Center Report

    Volume 41, Issue 1, January-February 2011, Pages: 32–42, ROBERT SPARROW

    Version of Record online : 8 FEB 2012, DOI: 10.1002/j.1552-146X.2011.tb00098.x

  9. MORAL PROGRESS AND MORAL ENHANCEMENT

    Bioethics

    Volume 27, Issue 5, June 2013, Pages: 285–290, JOHN HARRIS

    Version of Record online : 19 JUN 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2012.01965.x

  10. The Principle of Procreative Beneficence: Old Arguments and A New Challenge

    Bioethics

    Volume 28, Issue 5, June 2014, Pages: 255–262, Andrew Hotke

    Version of Record online : 29 JUL 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2012.01999.x

  11. You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article
    MORAL ENHANCEMENT VIA DIRECT EMOTION MODULATION: A REPLY TO JOHN HARRIS

    Bioethics

    Volume 27, Issue 3, March 2013, Pages: 160–168, THOMAS DOUGLAS

    Version of Record online : 17 NOV 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01919.x

  12. You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article
    When Intuition is Not Enough. Why the Principle of Procreative Beneficence Must Work Much Harder to Justify Its Eugenic Vision

    Bioethics

    Volume 28, Issue 9, November 2014, Pages: 447–455, Rebecca Bennett

    Version of Record online : 10 JUL 2013, DOI: 10.1111/bioe.12044

  13. The Perils of Cognitive Enhancement and the Urgent Imperative to Enhance the Moral Character of Humanity

    Journal of Applied Philosophy

    Volume 25, Issue 3, August 2008, Pages: 162–177, INGMAR PERSSON and JULIAN SAVULESCU

    Version of Record online : 9 JUL 2008, DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5930.2008.00410.x

  14. Enhancing Human Capacities – Edited by J. Savulescu, R. ter Meulen & G. Kahane

    Journal of Applied Philosophy

    Volume 29, Issue 2, May 2012, Pages: 162–165, CANDICE DELMAS

    Version of Record online : 16 MAY 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5930.2011.00552.x

  15. Transhumanism and Enhancement

    Standard Article

    eLS

    Susan B Levin

    Published Online : 15 OCT 2014, DOI: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0024136

  16. A Defence of the Counterfactual Account of Harm

    Bioethics

    Volume 30, Issue 4, May 2016, Pages: 251–259, Craig Purshouse

    Version of Record online : 30 SEP 2015, DOI: 10.1111/bioe.12207

  17. WHY WE ARE NOT MORALLY REQUIRED TO SELECT THE BEST CHILDREN: A RESPONSE TO SAVULESCU

    Bioethics

    Volume 22, Issue 7, September 2008, Pages: 364–369, SARAH E. STOLLER

    Version of Record online : 25 APR 2008, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00659.x

  18. You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article
    Normal Human Variation: Refocussing the Enhancement Debate

    Bioethics

    Volume 29, Issue 2, February 2015, Pages: 133–143, Guy Kahane and Julian Savulescu

    Version of Record online : 2 AUG 2013, DOI: 10.1111/bioe.12045

  19. PROCREATIVE BENEFICENCE – CUI BONO?

    Bioethics

    Volume 25, Issue 9, November 2011, Pages: 482–488, JAKOB ELSTER

    Version of Record online : 30 DEC 2009, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01794.x

  20. You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article
    Neuroethical issues in pharmacological cognitive enhancement

    Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science

    Volume 5, Issue 5, September/October 2014, Pages: 533–549, Ahmed Dahir Mohamed

    Version of Record online : 28 JUL 2014, DOI: 10.1002/wcs.1306