Search Results

There are 15579 results for: content related to: Book Reviews

  1. Sentencing Councils and Victims

    The Modern Law Review

    Volume 75, Issue 3, May 2012, Pages: 324–346, Ian Edwards

    Version of Record online : 3 MAY 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2230.2012.00903.x

  2. Questioning Blackmun's Thesis: Does Uniformity in Sentencing Entail Unfairness?

    Law & Society Review

    Volume 49, Issue 2, June 2015, Pages: 499–534, Ben Grunwald

    Version of Record online : 13 MAY 2015, DOI: 10.1111/lasr.12141

  3. Modeling Discretion in American Sentencing Systems

    Law & Policy

    Volume 20, Issue 4, October 1998, Pages: 389–428, Kevin Reitz

    Version of Record online : 16 DEC 2002, DOI: 10.1111/1467-9930.00056

  4. THE POWER OF DIVERSION: INTERMEDIATE SANCTIONS AND SENTENCING DISPARITY UNDER PRESUMPTIVE GUIDELINES

    Criminology

    Volume 50, Issue 3, August 2012, Pages: 811–850, BRIAN D. JOHNSON and STEPHANIE M. DIPIETRO

    Version of Record online : 8 MAY 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2012.00279.x

  5. Judicial Discretion and Sentencing Behavior: Did the Feeney Amendment Rein in District Judges?

    Journal of Empirical Legal Studies

    Volume 7, Issue 2, June 2010, Pages: 355–378, Beth A. Freeborn and Monica E. Hartmann

    Version of Record online : 10 MAY 2010, DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2010.01181.x

  6. Guidelines are not enough: The need for written sentencing opinions

    Behavioral Sciences & the Law

    Volume 7, Issue 1, Winter 1989, Pages: 3–24, Professor Marc Miller

    Version of Record online : 13 FEB 2006, DOI: 10.1002/bsl.2370070103

  7. SENTENCING HOMICIDE OFFENDERS IN THE NETHERLANDS: OFFENDER, VICTIM, AND SITUATIONAL INFLUENCES IN CRIMINAL PUNISHMENT

    Criminology

    Volume 48, Issue 4, November 2010, Pages: 981–1018, BRIAN D. JOHNSON, SIGRID VAN WINGERDEN and PAUL NIEUWBEERTA

    Version of Record online : 28 NOV 2010, DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2010.00210.x

  8. DISCRETION AND DISPARITY UNDER SENTENCING GUIDELINES: THE ROLE OF DEPARTURES AND STRUCTURED SENTENCING ALTERNATIVES

    Criminology

    Volume 41, Issue 1, February 2003, Pages: 99–130, RODNEY L. ENGEN, RANDY R. GAINEY, ROBERT D. CRUTCHFIELD and JOSEPH G. WEIS

    Version of Record online : 7 MAR 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2003.tb00983.x

  9. THE EFFECT OF GENDER ON THE DECISION TO INCARCERATE BEFORE AND AFTER THE INTRODUCTION OF SENTENCING GUIDELINES

    Criminology

    Volume 40, Issue 2, May 2002, Pages: 297–328, BARBARA A. KOONS-WITT

    Version of Record online : 7 MAR 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2002.tb00958.x

  10. An Empirical Evaluation of the Connecticut Death Penalty System Since 1973: Are There Unlawful Racial, Gender, and Geographic Disparities?

    Journal of Empirical Legal Studies

    Volume 11, Issue 4, December 2014, Pages: 637–696, John J. Donohue III

    Version of Record online : 28 OCT 2014, DOI: 10.1111/jels.12052

  11. Legal Change and Sentencing Norms in the Wake of Booker: The Impact of Time and Place on Drug Trafficking Cases in Federal Court

    Law & Society Review

    Volume 48, Issue 2, June 2014, Pages: 411–445, Mona Lynch and Marisa Omori

    Version of Record online : 3 JUN 2014, DOI: 10.1111/lasr.12070

  12. Racial Disparity Under Sentencing Guidelines: A Survey of Recent Research and Emerging Perspectives

    Sociology Compass

    Volume 7, Issue 7, July 2013, Pages: 503–514, Brian D. Johnson and Jacqueline G. Lee

    Version of Record online : 29 JUL 2013, DOI: 10.1111/soc4.12046

  13. The Impact of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 on Theft and the Custody Threshold

    The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice

    Volume 54, Issue 2, May 2015, Pages: 176–192, Gary Betts

    Version of Record online : 9 OCT 2014, DOI: 10.1111/hojo.12100

  14. TRANSFERRED JUVENILES IN THE ERA OF SENTENCING GUIDELINES: EXAMINING JUDICIAL DEPARTURES FOR JUVENILE OFFENDERS IN ADULT CRIMINAL COURT

    Criminology

    Volume 50, Issue 2, May 2012, Pages: 525–564, BRIAN D. JOHNSON and MEGAN C. KURLYCHEK

    Version of Record online : 8 MAR 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2011.00270.x

  15. THE APPRENDI-BLAKELY CASES: SENTENCING REFORM COUNTER REVOLUTION?

    Criminology & Public Policy

    Volume 6, Issue 3, August 2007, Pages: 403–431, RICHARD S. FRASE

    Version of Record online : 15 SEP 2007, DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-9133.2007.00445.x

  16. Delivering Justice in Indigenous Sentencing Courts: What This Means for Judicial Officers, Elders, Community Representatives, and Indigenous Court Workers

    Law & Policy

    Volume 36, Issue 4, October 2014, Pages: 341–369, Elena Marchetti

    Version of Record online : 26 AUG 2014, DOI: 10.1111/lapo.12028

  17. Racial Disparities Under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines: The Role of Judicial Discretion and Mandatory Minimums

    Journal of Empirical Legal Studies

    Volume 9, Issue 4, December 2012, Pages: 729–764, Joshua B. Fischman and Max M. Schanzenbach

    Version of Record online : 6 NOV 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2012.01266.x

  18. RACIAL AND ETHNIC DISPARITIES IN SENTENCING DEPARTURES ACROSS MODES OF CONVICTION

    Criminology

    Volume 41, Issue 2, May 2003, Pages: 449–490, BRIAN D. JOHNSON

    Version of Record online : 7 MAR 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2003.tb00994.x

  19. The Trial Penalty and Jury Sentencing: A Study of Air Force Courts-Martial

    Journal of Empirical Legal Studies

    Volume 8, Issue 1, March 2011, Pages: 206–235, Patricia D. Breen

    Version of Record online : 17 FEB 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2010.01206.x

  20. Sentencing and State-Level Racial and Ethnic Contexts

    Law & Society Review

    Volume 49, Issue 4, December 2015, Pages: 883–915, Xia Wang and Daniel P. Mears

    Version of Record online : 28 OCT 2015, DOI: 10.1111/lasr.12164