Search Results

There are 12888 results for: content related to: How Well do Sentencing Guidelines Work?: Equity, Proportionality and Consistency in the Determination of Fine Levels in the Magistrates' Courts of England and Wales

  1. Sentencing Councils and Victims

    The Modern Law Review

    Volume 75, Issue 3, May 2012, Pages: 324–346, Ian Edwards

    Version of Record online : 3 MAY 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2230.2012.00903.x

  2. THE POWER OF DIVERSION: INTERMEDIATE SANCTIONS AND SENTENCING DISPARITY UNDER PRESUMPTIVE GUIDELINES

    Criminology

    Volume 50, Issue 3, August 2012, Pages: 811–850, BRIAN D. JOHNSON and STEPHANIE M. DIPIETRO

    Version of Record online : 8 MAY 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2012.00279.x

  3. Does Racial Balance in Workforce Representation Yield Equal Justice? Race Relations of Sentencing in Federal Court Organizations

    Law & Society Review

    Volume 43, Issue 4, December 2009, Pages: 757–806, Geoff Ward, Amy Farrell and Danielle Rousseau

    Version of Record online : 11 DEC 2009, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5893.2009.00388.x

  4. “Fundamentally Flawed?”

    Criminology & Public Policy

    Volume 13, Issue 2, May 2014, Pages: 241–270, Kimberly A. Kaiser and Cassia Spohn

    Version of Record online : 17 JUL 2014, DOI: 10.1111/1745-9133.12082

  5. Have Federal Judges Changed Their Sentencing Practices? The Shaky Empirical Foundations of the Feeney Amendment

    Journal of Empirical Legal Studies

    Volume 2, Issue 1, March 2005, Pages: 1–48, Max Schanzenbach

    Version of Record online : 15 MAR 2005, DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2005.00030.x

  6. An Empirical Evaluation of the Connecticut Death Penalty System Since 1973: Are There Unlawful Racial, Gender, and Geographic Disparities?

    Journal of Empirical Legal Studies

    Volume 11, Issue 4, December 2014, Pages: 637–696, John J. Donohue III

    Version of Record online : 28 OCT 2014, DOI: 10.1111/jels.12052

  7. TRANSFERRED JUVENILES IN THE ERA OF SENTENCING GUIDELINES: EXAMINING JUDICIAL DEPARTURES FOR JUVENILE OFFENDERS IN ADULT CRIMINAL COURT

    Criminology

    Volume 50, Issue 2, May 2012, Pages: 525–564, BRIAN D. JOHNSON and MEGAN C. KURLYCHEK

    Version of Record online : 8 MAR 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2011.00270.x

  8. Crime and Punishment in Korea, Republic of (South Korea)

    Standard Article

    The Encyclopedia of Crime and Punishment

    MiRang Park

    Published Online : 28 DEC 2015, DOI: 10.1002/9781118519639.wbecpx112

  9. You have free access to this content
    Delivering Justice in Indigenous Sentencing Courts: What This Means for Judicial Officers, Elders, Community Representatives, and Indigenous Court Workers

    Law & Policy

    Volume 36, Issue 4, October 2014, Pages: 341–369, Elena Marchetti

    Version of Record online : 26 AUG 2014, DOI: 10.1111/lapo.12028

  10. Judicial Discretion and Sentencing Behavior: Did the Feeney Amendment Rein in District Judges?

    Journal of Empirical Legal Studies

    Volume 7, Issue 2, June 2010, Pages: 355–378, Beth A. Freeborn and Monica E. Hartmann

    Version of Record online : 10 MAY 2010, DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2010.01181.x

  11. Jury Sentencing in Noncapital Cases: Comparing Severity and Variance with Judicial Sentences in Two States

    Journal of Empirical Legal Studies

    Volume 2, Issue 2, July 2005, Pages: 331–367, Nancy J. King and Rosevelt L. Noble

    Version of Record online : 27 JUN 2005, DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2005.00053.x

  12. Questioning Blackmun's Thesis: Does Uniformity in Sentencing Entail Unfairness?

    Law & Society Review

    Volume 49, Issue 2, June 2015, Pages: 499–534, Ben Grunwald

    Version of Record online : 13 MAY 2015, DOI: 10.1111/lasr.12141

  13. The Localized Uses of Federal Sentencing Guidelines in Four U.S. District Courts: Evidence of Processual Order

    Symbolic Interaction

    Volume 28, Issue 2, May 2005, Pages: 255–279, Jeffery T. Ulmer

    Version of Record online : 22 DEC 2011, DOI: 10.1525/si.2005.28.2.255

  14. Remodeling American Sentencing: A Ten-Step Blueprint for Moving Past Mass Incarceration

    Criminology & Public Policy

    Volume 13, Issue 4, November 2014, Pages: 503–533, Michael Tonry

    Version of Record online : 22 NOV 2014, DOI: 10.1111/1745-9133.12097

  15. FEDERAL SENTENCING AS A COMPLEX COLLABORATIVE PROCESS: JUDGES, PROSECUTORS, JUDGE–PROSECUTOR DYADS, AND DISPARITY IN SENTENCING

    Criminology

    Volume 53, Issue 4, November 2015, Pages: 597–623, BYUNGBAE KIM, CASSIA SPOHN and E. C. HEDBERG

    Version of Record online : 24 SEP 2015, DOI: 10.1111/1745-9125.12090

  16. Determinate Sentencing

    Standard Article

    The Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice

    Jermaine A. Johnson and RaShaunda V. Sterling

    Published Online : 22 JAN 2014, DOI: 10.1002/9781118517383.wbeccj141

  17. Blended Sentencing Laws and the Punitive Turn in Juvenile Justice

    Law & Social Inquiry

    Volume 41, Issue 2, Spring 2016, Pages: 435–463, Shelly S. Schaefer and Christopher Uggen

    Version of Record online : 15 FEB 2016, DOI: 10.1111/lsi.12172

  18. Legal Change and Sentencing Norms in the Wake of Booker: The Impact of Time and Place on Drug Trafficking Cases in Federal Court

    Law & Society Review

    Volume 48, Issue 2, June 2014, Pages: 411–445, Mona Lynch and Marisa Omori

    Version of Record online : 3 JUN 2014, DOI: 10.1111/lasr.12070

  19. DO MORAL COMMUNITIES PLAY A ROLE IN CRIMINAL SENTENCING? Evidence from Pennsylvania

    The Sociological Quarterly

    Volume 49, Issue 4, Fall 2008, Pages: 737–768, Jeffery T. Ulmer, Christopher Bader and Martha Gault

    Version of Record online : 14 OCT 2008, DOI: 10.1111/j.1533-8525.2008.00134.x

  20. Racial Disparities Under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines: The Role of Judicial Discretion and Mandatory Minimums

    Journal of Empirical Legal Studies

    Volume 9, Issue 4, December 2012, Pages: 729–764, Joshua B. Fischman and Max M. Schanzenbach

    Version of Record online : 6 NOV 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2012.01266.x