Search Results

There are 12436 results for: content related to: The Effect of Politically Salient Decisions on the U.S. Supreme Court's Agenda

  1. The Impact of Supreme Court Activity on the Judicial Agenda

    Law & Society Review

    Volume 48, Issue 1, March 2014, Pages: 63–90, Douglas Rice

    Version of Record online : 27 JAN 2014, DOI: 10.1111/lasr.12056

  2. Is Certiorari Contingent on Litigant Behavior? Petitioners' Role in Strategic Auditing

    Journal of Empirical Legal Studies

    Volume 10, Issue 1, March 2013, Pages: 54–75, Maxwell Mak, Andrew H. Sidman and Udi Sommer

    Version of Record online : 18 JAN 2013, DOI: 10.1111/jels.12002

  3. Friends of the Court: Examining the Influence of Amicus Curiae Participation in U.S. Supreme Court Litigation

    Law & Society Review

    Volume 38, Issue 4, December 2004, Pages: 807–832, Paul M. Collins Jr.

    Version of Record online : 12 NOV 2004, DOI: 10.1111/j.0023-9216.2004.00067.x

  4. THE BEST SEAT IN THE HOUSE: THE COURT ASSIGNMENT AND JUDICIAL SATISFACTION

    Family Court Review

    Volume 47, Issue 2, April 2009, Pages: 209–238, Deborah Chase and Hon. Peggy Fulton Hora

    Version of Record online : 13 MAR 2009, DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2009.01250.x

  5. THE SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE BENCH AND BAR

    Family Court Review

    Volume 48, Issue 4, October 2010, Pages: 607–618, Hon. Randall T. Shepard

    Version of Record online : 20 SEP 2010, DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2010.01336.x

  6. The Influence of Amicus Curiae Briefs on U.S. Supreme Court Opinion Content

    Law & Society Review

    Volume 49, Issue 4, December 2015, Pages: 917–944, Paul M. Collins Jr., Pamela C. Corley and Jesse Hamner

    Version of Record online : 28 OCT 2015, DOI: 10.1111/lasr.12166

  7. New Research Sheds Light on How Litigants Evaluate the Characteristics of Legal Procedures

    Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation

    Volume 34, Issue 10, November 2016, Pages: 145–154, Donna Shestowsky

    Version of Record online : 7 NOV 2016, DOI: 10.1002/alt.21655

  8. The Toughest Nut: Handling Cases Pitting Unrepresented Litigants Against Represented Ones

    Juvenile and Family Court Journal

    Volume 62, Issue 1, Winter 2011, Pages: 10–31, Russell Engler

    Version of Record online : 22 FEB 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-6988.2010.01054.x

  9. Friends of the Circuits: Interest Group Influence on Decision Making in the U.S. Courts of Appeals

    Social Science Quarterly

    Volume 91, Issue 2, June 2010, Pages: 397–414, Paul M. Collins Jr. and Wendy L. Martinek

    Version of Record online : 6 APR 2010, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2010.00699.x

  10. Litigant Status and Trial Court Appeal Mobilization

    Law & Policy

    Volume 37, Issue 4, October 2015, Pages: 294–323, Christina L. Boyd

    Version of Record online : 11 SEP 2015, DOI: 10.1111/lapo.12040

  11. Setting a Judicial Agenda: The Decision to Grant En Banc Review in the U.S. Courts of Appeals

    Journal of Politics

    Volume 68, Issue 4, November 2006, Pages: 852–866, Micheal W. Giles, Thomas G. Walker and Christopher Zorn

    Version of Record online : 6 OCT 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00475.x

  12. You have free access to this content
    From Talk to Action: How the IAALS Summit Recommendations Can Reshape Family Justice

    Family Court Review

    Volume 55, Issue 1, January 2017, Pages: 97–106, Natalie A. Knowlton

    Version of Record online : 18 JAN 2017, DOI: 10.1111/fcre.12265

  13. Judicial Ideology and the Selection of Disputes for U.S. Supreme Court Adjudication

    Journal of Empirical Legal Studies

    Volume 10, Issue 4, December 2013, Pages: 847–865, Jeff Yates, Damon M. Cann and Brent D. Boyea

    Version of Record online : 23 OCT 2013, DOI: 10.1111/jels.12030

  14. Speaking of Justice: Encounters in a Legal Self-Help Clinic

    PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review

    Volume 39, Issue 2, November 2016, Pages: 261–275, Alyse Bertenthal

    Version of Record online : 21 NOV 2016, DOI: 10.1111/plar.12193

  15. Administrative Appeals to the U.S. Supreme Court: The Importance of Legal Signals

    Journal of Empirical Legal Studies

    Volume 4, Issue 3, November 2007, Pages: 625–649, Robert J. Hume

    Version of Record online : 11 SEP 2007, DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2007.00101.x

  16. Lawyers, Justices, and Issue Salience: When and How Do Legal Arguments Affect the U.S. Supreme Court?

    Law & Society Review

    Volume 41, Issue 2, June 2007, Pages: 259–278, Andrea McAtee and Kevin T. McGuire

    Version of Record online : 18 MAY 2007, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5893.2007.00298.x

  17. Splitting the Difference: Modeling Appellate Court Decisions with Mixed Outcomes

    Law & Society Review

    Volume 41, Issue 2, June 2007, Pages: 429–456, Stefanie A. Lindquist, Wendy L. Martinek and Virginia A. Hettinger

    Version of Record online : 18 MAY 2007, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5893.2007.00303.x

  18. The “Right Paper”: Developing Legal Literacy in a Legal Self-Help Clinic

    Law & Social Inquiry

    Alyse Bertenthal

    Version of Record online : 28 NOV 2016, DOI: 10.1111/lsi.12267

  19. Is There a Chinese Common Law? An Empirical Study of the Bilingual Common-Law System of Hong Kong

    Journal of Empirical Legal Studies

    Volume 8, Issue 1, March 2011, Pages: 118–146, Kwai Hang Ng

    Version of Record online : 17 FEB 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2010.01203.x

  20. Judges, Litigants, and the Design of Courts

    Law & Society Review

    Volume 46, Issue 3, September 2012, Pages: 497–522, Paul Brace, Jeff Yates and Brent D. Boyea

    Version of Record online : 23 AUG 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5893.2012.00504.x