Search Results

There are 22787 results for: content related to: From the Editor: Scholarly Reviews and the Review Process

  1. Five Proposals for Reforming Article Publishing in the Social Scientific Study of Religion (Especially Quantitative): Improving the Quality, Value, and Cumulativeness of Our Scholarship

    Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion

    Volume 49, Issue 4, December 2010, Pages: 583–595, Christian Smith

    Article first published online : 1 DEC 2010, DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5906.2010.01532.x

  2. Revising Manuscripts for Premier Entrepreneurship Journals

    Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice

    Volume 36, Issue 2, March 2012, Pages: 193–203, John A. Pearce II

    Article first published online : 15 MAR 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00502.x

  3. You have free access to this content
    Editorial: The Future of Writing and Reviewing for IJMR

    International Journal of Management Reviews

    Volume 16, Issue 3, July 2014, Pages: 249–264, Oswald Jones and Caroline Gatrell

    Article first published online : 30 JUN 2014, DOI: 10.1111/ijmr.12038

  4. Model competencies in regulatory therapeutic product assessment: Health Canada's good review guiding principles as a reviewing community's code of intellectual conduct

    Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety

    Volume 16, Issue 8, August 2007, Pages: 933–941, Robyn R. Lim

    Article first published online : 9 FEB 2007, DOI: 10.1002/pds.1366

  5. You have free access to this content
    Seeking good peer review in geomorphology

    Earth Surface Processes and Landforms

    Volume 37, Issue 1, January 2012, Pages: 3–8, Stuart N. Lane

    Article first published online : 4 JAN 2012, DOI: 10.1002/esp.2269

  6. Specific Inappropriate Acts in the Publication Process

    Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research

    Volume 32, Issue 2, April 2006, Pages: 121–127,

    Article first published online : 17 MAR 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2006.00393.x

  7. Addressing Reviewer Comments as an Integrative Negotiation

    Management and Organization Review

    Volume 10, Issue 2, July 2014, Pages: 183–190, Leigh Anne Liu

    Article first published online : 11 AUG 2014, DOI: 10.1111/more.12061

  8. The Reliability and Influence of Peer Reviews

    American Anthropologist

    Michael Chibnik

    Article first published online : 26 APR 2016, DOI: 10.1111/aman.12523

  9. Social Biases and Solutions for Procedural Objectivity

    Hypatia

    Volume 26, Issue 2, Spring 2011, Pages: 352–373, CAROLE J. LEE and CHRISTIAN D. SCHUNN

    Article first published online : 10 MAR 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01178.x

  10. Licking your Wounds: Responding to the Peer Review Process

    Journal of Forensic Nursing

    Volume 7, Issue 4, December 2011, Pages: 157–158, Cindy Peternelj-Taylor

    Article first published online : 28 NOV 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-3938.2011.01120.x

  11. You have free access to this content
    Editorial: Writing a helpful journal review: application of the 6 C's

    Journal of Clinical Nursing

    Volume 23, Issue 19-20, October 2014, Pages: 2695–2697, Julie Taylor and Caroline Bradbury-Jones

    Article first published online : 18 JUN 2014, DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12643

  12. Free access to the TOP 10 cited EXD papers from 2011 and 2012

    Experimental Dermatology

    Volume 22, Issue 3, March 2013, Page: 161,

    Article first published online : 12 MAR 2013, DOI: 10.1111/exd.12126

  13. You have free access to this content
    From the Editor

    Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion

    Volume 47, Issue 4, December 2008, Pages: i–iii, Marie Cornwall

    Article first published online : 12 NOV 2008, DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5906.2008.00442.x

  14. Peer review under the microscope: An editor's view

    Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care

    Volume 21, Issue 5, October 2011, Pages: 453–457, Daniel L. Chan

    Article first published online : 10 OCT 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-4431.2011.00683.x

  15. From Manuscript Submission to Accepted Article: The Process at HSR

    Health Services Research

    Volume 38, Issue 4, August 2003, Pages: 999–1008, Harold S. Luft and Ann Barry Flood

    Article first published online : 12 AUG 2003, DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.00159

  16. Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies

    Methodology Review

    The Cochrane Library

    Tom Jefferson, Melanie Rudin, Suzanne Brodney Folse and Frank Davidoff

    Published Online : 18 APR 2007, DOI: 10.1002/14651858.MR000016.pub3

  17. The Developmental Reviewer

    Management and Organization Review

    Volume 10, Issue 2, July 2014, Pages: 175–181, Paul S. Hempel

    Article first published online : 11 AUG 2014, DOI: 10.1111/more.12060

  18. Promoting Diversity in Management Scholarship: Opening the Doors for Multiple Languages, and Interdisciplinary Dialogue and Developing Our Communities

    European Management Review

    Volume 11, Issue 1, Spring 2014, Pages: 1–4, Mustafa Özbilgin

    Article first published online : 11 APR 2014, DOI: 10.1111/emre.12027

  19. How would you recognise a good review?

    Australian Journal of Rural Health

    Volume 22, Issue 4, August 2014, Pages: 143–144, David Perkins

    Article first published online : 13 AUG 2014, DOI: 10.1111/ajr.12131

  20. The Generous Spirit of the Peer Review Process: Perspectives and Insights From the HRDQ Editorial Team on Providing High-Quality Reviews

    Human Resource Development Quarterly

    Volume 24, Issue 4, Winter 2013, Pages: 417–428, Andrea D. Ellinger, Valerie Anderson, Claire Gubbins, Mary Lynn Lunn, Kim F. Nimon, Maura Sheehan and Jon M. Werner

    Article first published online : 10 DEC 2013, DOI: 10.1002/hrdq.21176