Search Results

There are 7927056 results for: content related to: Surveys using camera traps: are we looking to a brighter future?

  1. Changing use of camera traps in mammalian field research: habitats, taxa and study types

    Mammal Review

    Volume 43, Issue 3, July 2013, Pages: 196–206, Jamie McCallum

    Version of Record online : 11 OCT 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2907.2012.00216.x

  2. Comparison of density estimation methods for mammal populations with camera traps in the Kaa-Iya del Gran Chaco landscape

    Animal Conservation

    Volume 15, Issue 5, October 2012, Pages: 527–535, A. J. Noss, B. Gardner, L. Maffei, E. Cuéllar, R. Montaño, A. Romero-Muñoz, R. Sollman and A. F. O'Connell

    Version of Record online : 18 APR 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-1795.2012.00545.x

  3. You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article
    Are we getting the full picture? Animal responses to camera traps and implications for predator studies

    Ecology and Evolution

    Volume 6, Issue 10, May 2016, Pages: 3216–3225, Paul Meek, Guy Ballard, Peter Fleming and Greg Falzon

    Version of Record online : 6 APR 2016, DOI: 10.1002/ece3.2111

  4. Spatiotemporal hierarchical modelling of species richness and occupancy using camera trap data

    Journal of Applied Ecology

    Volume 52, Issue 2, April 2015, Pages: 413–421, Mathias W. Tobler, Alfonso Zúñiga Hartley, Samia E. Carrillo-Percastegui and George V. N. Powell

    Version of Record online : 20 FEB 2015, DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.12399

  5. Camera traps and mark-resight models: The value of ancillary data for evaluating assumptions

    The Journal of Wildlife Management

    Volume 79, Issue 7, September 2015, Pages: 1163–1172, Arielle W. Parsons, Theodore R. Simons, Kenneth H. Pollock, Michael K. Stoskopf, Jessica J. Stocking and Allan F. O'connell Jr.

    Version of Record online : 13 AUG 2015, DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.931

  6. You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article
    Applying a random encounter model to estimate lion density from camera traps in Serengeti National Park, Tanzania

    The Journal of Wildlife Management

    Volume 79, Issue 6, August 2015, Pages: 1014–1021, Jeremy J. Cusack, Alexandra Swanson, Tim Coulson, Craig Packer, Chris Carbone, Amy J. Dickman, Margaret Kosmala, Chris Lintott and J. Marcus Rowcliffe

    Version of Record online : 28 MAY 2015, DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.902

  7. You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article
    Quantifying levels of animal activity using camera trap data

    Methods in Ecology and Evolution

    Volume 5, Issue 11, November 2014, Pages: 1170–1179, J. Marcus Rowcliffe, Roland Kays, Bart Kranstauber, Chris Carbone and Patrick A. Jansen

    Version of Record online : 7 OCT 2014, DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.12278

  8. You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article
    Under the snow: a new camera trap opens the white box of subnivean ecology

    Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation

    Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2015, Pages: 29–38, Eeva M. Soininen, Ingrid Jensvoll, Siw T. Killengreen and Rolf A. Ims

    Version of Record online : 14 MAY 2015, DOI: 10.1002/rse2.2

  9. Carnivore biodiversity in Tanzania: revealing the distribution patterns of secretive mammals using camera traps

    Animal Conservation

    Volume 13, Issue 2, April 2010, Pages: 131–139, N. Pettorelli, A. L. Lobora, M. J. Msuha, C. Foley and S. M. Durant

    Version of Record online : 9 OCT 2009, DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-1795.2009.00309.x

  10. Melanistic leopards reveal their spots: Infrared camera traps provide a population density estimate of leopards in malaysia

    The Journal of Wildlife Management

    Volume 79, Issue 5, July 2015, Pages: 846–853, Laurie Hedges, Wai Yee Lam, Ahimsa Campos-Arceiz, D. Mark Rayan, William F. Laurance, Chris J. Latham, Salman Saaban and Gopalasamy Reuben Clements

    Version of Record online : 26 MAY 2015, DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.901

  11. You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article
    How do passive infrared triggered camera traps operate and why does it matter? Breaking down common misconceptions

    Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation

    Volume 2, Issue 2, June 2016, Pages: 77–83, Dustin J. Welbourne, Andrew W. Claridge, David J. Paull and Andrew Lambert

    Version of Record online : 28 JUN 2016, DOI: 10.1002/rse2.20

  12. A direct comparison of camera-trapping and sign transects for monitoring wildlife in the Wanglang National Nature Reserve, China

    Wildlife Society Bulletin

    Volume 36, Issue 3, September 2012, Pages: 538–545, Sheng Li, William J. McShea, Dajun Wang, Junzhong Huang and Liangkun Shao

    Version of Record online : 19 JUL 2012, DOI: 10.1002/wsb.161

  13. Evaluating capture–recapture population and density estimation of tigers in a population with known parameters

    Animal Conservation

    Volume 13, Issue 1, January 2010, Pages: 94–103, R. K. Sharma, Y. Jhala, Q. Qureshi, J. Vattakaven, R. Gopal and K. Nayak

    Version of Record online : 11 SEP 2009, DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-1795.2009.00305.x

  14. You have free access to this content
    Towards good practice guidance in using camera-traps in ecology: influence of sampling design on validity of ecological inferences

    Methods in Ecology and Evolution

    Volume 4, Issue 2, February 2013, Pages: 105–113, Sandra Hamel, Siw T. Killengreen, John-Andre Henden, Nina E. Eide, Lars Roed-Eriksen, Rolf A. Ims and Nigel G. Yoccoz

    Version of Record online : 19 NOV 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.2041-210x.2012.00262.x

  15. REVIEW: Wildlife camera trapping: a review and recommendations for linking surveys to ecological processes

    Journal of Applied Ecology

    Volume 52, Issue 3, June 2015, Pages: 675–685, A. Cole Burton, Eric Neilson, Dario Moreira, Andrew Ladle, Robin Steenweg, Jason T. Fisher, Erin Bayne and Stan Boutin

    Version of Record online : 11 APR 2015, DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.12432

  16. Individual identification of wild giant pandas from camera trap photos – a systematic and hierarchical approach

    Journal of Zoology

    X. Zheng, M. A. Owen, Y. Nie, Y. Hu, R. R. Swaisgood, L. Yan and F. Wei

    Version of Record online : 16 AUG 2016, DOI: 10.1111/jzo.12377

  17. How Small is too Small? Camera Trap Survey Areas and Density Estimates for Ocelots in the Bolivian Chaco

    Biotropica

    Volume 40, Issue 1, January 2008, Pages: 71–75, Leonardo Maffei and Andrew J. Noss

    Version of Record online : 18 JUL 2007, DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2007.00341.x

  18. Density estimation of sympatric carnivores using spatially explicit capture–recapture methods and standard trapping grid

    Ecological Applications

    Volume 21, Issue 8, December 2011, Pages: 2908–2916, Timothy G. O'Brien and Margaret F. Kinnaird

    Version of Record online : 1 DEC 2011, DOI: 10.1890/10-2284.1

  19. Brazilian Tapir Density in the Pantanal: A Comparison of Systematic Camera-Trapping and Line-Transect Surveys

    Biotropica

    Volume 40, Issue 2, March 2008, Pages: 211–217, Mogens Trolle, Andrew J. Noss, José Luis Passos Cordeiro and Luiz Flamarion B. Oliveira

    Version of Record online : 25 SEP 2007, DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2007.00350.x

  20. You have free access to this content
    Estimating animal density using camera traps without the need for individual recognition

    Journal of Applied Ecology

    Volume 45, Issue 4, August 2008, Pages: 1228–1236, J. Marcus Rowcliffe, Juliet Field, Samuel T. Turvey and Chris Carbone

    Version of Record online : 16 MAY 2008, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01473.x