Search Results

There are 25432 results for: content related to: “Cesarean Delivery on Maternal Request”: Was the NIH Conference Based on a Faulty Premise?

  1. “Suffering Twice”: The Gender Politics of Cesarean Sections in Taiwan

    Medical Anthropology Quarterly

    Volume 28, Issue 3, September 2014, Pages: 399–418, Chen-I Kuan

    Version of Record online : 13 JUN 2014, DOI: 10.1111/maq.12103

  2. Effect of Managed Care Enrollment on Primary and Repeat Cesarean Rates Among U.S. Department of Defense Health Care Beneficiaries in Military and Civilian Hospitals Worldwide, 1999–2002

    Birth

    Volume 31, Issue 4, December 2004, Pages: 254–264, Andrea Linton and Michael R. Peterson

    Version of Record online : 25 NOV 2004, DOI: 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2004.00317.x

  3. Potential avoidability of planned cesarean sections in a French national database

    Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

    Volume 93, Issue 9, September 2014, Pages: 905–912, Benedicte Coulm, Beatrice Blondel, Sophie Alexander, Michel Boulvain and Camille Le Ray

    Version of Record online : 23 JUL 2014, DOI: 10.1111/aogs.12439

  4. Requesting Cesareans without Medical Indications: An Option Being Considered by Young Canadian Women

    Birth

    Volume 39, Issue 1, March 2012, Pages: 39–47, Frances Gallagher, Linda Bell, Guy Waddell, Annie Benoît and Nathalie Côté

    Version of Record online : 9 JAN 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2011.00511.x

  5. Practice of Primary Elective Cesarean Upon Maternal Request in the Commonwealth of Virginia

    Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing

    Volume 41, Issue 6, November/December 2012, Pages: 738–746, Bunan Alnaif and Hind Beydoun

    Version of Record online : 12 JUL 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2012.01387.x

  6. A Review of Issues Surrounding Medically Elective Cesarean Delivery

    Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing

    Volume 36, Issue 6, November/December 2007, Pages: 605–615, Susan R. Miesnik and Barbara J. Reale

    Version of Record online : 26 OCT 2007, DOI: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2007.00196.x

  7. Recommendations for Routine Reporting on Indications for Cesarean Delivery in Developing Countries

    Birth

    Volume 35, Issue 3, September 2008, Pages: 204–211, Cynthia Stanton, 1 Carine Ronsmans and 2 the Baltimore Group on Cesarean

    Version of Record online : 20 AUG 2008, DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2008.00241.x

  8. Putting Mothers and Babies at Risk: Promoting the Elusive “Cesarean Delivery on Maternal Request”

    Birth

    Volume 36, Issue 3, September 2009, Pages: 254–257, Nicette Jukelevics

    Version of Record online : 8 SEP 2009, DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2009.00332.x

  9. College Students' Knowledge and Attitudes About Cesarean Birth

    Birth

    Volume 24, Issue 3, September 1997, Pages: 159–164, Claudia Lampman and Alissa Phelps

    Version of Record online : 28 JUN 2008, DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.1997.00159.pp.x

  10. Reducing Cesarean Section Rates Safely: Lessons from a “Breakthrough Series” Collaborative

    Birth

    Volume 25, Issue 2, June 1998, Pages: 117–124, Bruce L. Flamm, Donald M. Berwick and Andrea Kabcenell

    Version of Record online : 10 SEP 2002, DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-536x.1998.00117.x

  11. U.S. Cesarean and VBAC Rates Stalled in the Mid-1990s

    Birth

    Volume 27, Issue 1, March 2000, Pages: 54–57, Sally C. Curtin, Lola Jean Kozak and Kimberly D. Gregory

    Version of Record online : 24 DEC 2001, DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-536x.2000.00054.x

  12. Surveillance of Cesarean Section Deliveries, New Jersey, 1999–2004

    Birth

    Volume 33, Issue 3, September 2006, Pages: 203–209, Charles E. Denk, Lakota K. Kruse and Neetu J. Jain

    Version of Record online : 29 AUG 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2006.00105.x

  13. Women’s Autonomy and Scheduled Cesarean Sections in Brazil: A Cautionary Tale

    Birth

    Volume 35, Issue 1, March 2008, Pages: 33–40, Joseph E. Potter, 1 Kristine Hopkins, 1 Anibal Faúndes and 2 Ignez Perpétuo 3

    Version of Record online : 27 FEB 2008, DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2007.00209.x

  14. Cesarean Delivery in Native American Women: Are Low Rates Explained by Practices Common to the Indian Health Service?

    Birth

    Volume 32, Issue 3, September 2005, Pages: 170–178, Sheila F. Mahoney and Lorraine Halinka Malcoe

    Version of Record online : 25 AUG 2005, DOI: 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2005.00366.x

  15. Effect of Preexisting Chronic Disease on Primary Cesarean Delivery Rates by Race for Births in U.S. Military Hospitals, 1999–2002

    Birth

    Volume 31, Issue 3, September 2004, Pages: 165–175, Andrea Linton and Michael R. Peterson

    Version of Record online : 27 AUG 2004, DOI: 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2004.00301.x

  16. “Too Posh to Push”: The Rise and Rise of a Catchphrase

    Birth

    Volume 40, Issue 4, December 2013, Pages: 264–271, Jane Weaver and Julia Magill-Cuerden

    Version of Record online : 17 DEC 2013, DOI: 10.1111/birt.12069

  17. You have free access to this content
    Antibiotic prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis for preventing infection after cesarean section

    Intervention Review

    The Cochrane Library

    Fiona M Smaill and Rosalie M Grivell

    Published Online : 28 OCT 2014, DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007482.pub3

  18. Elective Cesarean Birth: Issues and Ethics of an Informed Decision

    Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health

    Volume 49, Issue 5, September-October 2004, Pages: 421–429, Barbara L. McFarlin

    Version of Record online : 24 DEC 2010, DOI: 10.1111/j.1542-2011.2004.tb04436.x

  19. Neonatal Mortality for Primary Cesarean and Vaginal Births to Low-Risk Women: Application of an “Intention-to-Treat” Model

    Birth

    Volume 35, Issue 1, March 2008, Pages: 3–8, Marian F. MacDorman, 1 Eugene Declercq, 2 Fay Menacker and 1 Michael H. Malloy 3

    Version of Record online : 27 FEB 2008, DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2007.00205.x

  20. Effects of Maternal Characteristics on Cesarean Delivery Rates among U.S. Department of Defense Healthcare Beneficiaries, 1996–2002

    Birth

    Volume 31, Issue 1, March 2004, Pages: 3–11, Andrea Linton, Michael R. Peterson and Thomas V. Williams

    Version of Record online : 19 MAR 2004, DOI: 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2004.0268.x