Search Results

There are 7987206 results for: content related to: Neonatal Mortality for Low-Risk Women by Method of Delivery

  1. Requesting Cesareans without Medical Indications: An Option Being Considered by Young Canadian Women


    Volume 39, Issue 1, March 2012, Pages: 39–47, Frances Gallagher, Linda Bell, Guy Waddell, Annie Benoît and Nathalie Côté

    Version of Record online : 9 JAN 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2011.00511.x

  2. Repeat Cesarean Delivery: What Indications Are Recorded in the Medical Chart?


    Volume 33, Issue 1, March 2006, Pages: 4–11, Mona T. Lydon-Rochelle, Carolyn Gardella, Vicky Cárdenas and Thomas R. Easterling

    Version of Record online : 24 FEB 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2006.00068.x

  3. A Review of Issues Surrounding Medically Elective Cesarean Delivery

    Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing

    Volume 36, Issue 6, November/December 2007, Pages: 605–615, Susan R. Miesnik and Barbara J. Reale

    Version of Record online : 26 OCT 2007, DOI: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2007.00196.x

  4. Recommendations for Routine Reporting on Indications for Cesarean Delivery in Developing Countries


    Volume 35, Issue 3, September 2008, Pages: 204–211, Cynthia Stanton, 1 Carine Ronsmans and 2 the Baltimore Group on Cesarean

    Version of Record online : 20 AUG 2008, DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2008.00241.x

  5. Neonatal Mortality for Primary Cesarean and Vaginal Births to Low-Risk Women: Application of an “Intention-to-Treat” Model


    Volume 35, Issue 1, March 2008, Pages: 3–8, Marian F. MacDorman, 1 Eugene Declercq, 2 Fay Menacker and 1 Michael H. Malloy 3

    Version of Record online : 27 FEB 2008, DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2007.00205.x

  6. Emergency cesarean delivery in induction of labor: an evaluation of risk factors

    Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

    Volume 84, Issue 5, May 2005, Pages: 456–462, Ragnhild Cnattingius, Berit Höglund and Helle Kieler

    Version of Record online : 12 APR 2005, DOI: 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2005.00620.x

  7. Effect of Managed Care Enrollment on Primary and Repeat Cesarean Rates Among U.S. Department of Defense Health Care Beneficiaries in Military and Civilian Hospitals Worldwide, 1999–2002


    Volume 31, Issue 4, December 2004, Pages: 254–264, Andrea Linton and Michael R. Peterson

    Version of Record online : 25 NOV 2004, DOI: 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2004.00317.x

  8. Analysis of cesarean delivery at Assiut University Hospital using the Ten Group Classification System

    International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics

    Volume 123, Issue 2, November 2013, Pages: 119–123, Hany Abdel-Aleem, Omar M. Shaaban, Ahmed I. Hassanin and Alaa A. Ibraheem

    Version of Record online : 31 JUL 2013, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.05.011

  9. Women's Request For a Cesarean Section: A Critique of the Literature


    Volume 27, Issue 4, December 2000, Pages: 256–263, Jenny A Gamble and Debra K Creedy

    Version of Record online : 24 DEC 2001, DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-536x.2000.00256.x

  10. Evaluation of neonatal outcomes in elective repeat cesarean delivery at term according to weeks of gestation

    Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research

    Volume 39, Issue 1, January 2013, Pages: 105–112, Serkan Ertuğrul, İsmet Gün, Ercüment Müngen, Murat Muhçu, Selim Kılıç and Vedat Atay

    Version of Record online : 13 AUG 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2012.01951.x

  11. Postpartum adverse effects and sexual satisfaction following cesarean delivery in Beijing

    International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics

    Volume 132, Issue 2, February 2016, Pages: 200–205, Ruiya Qian, Zhenghong Chen, Lirong Tang and Weiyuan Zhang

    Version of Record online : 26 OCT 2015, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.07.010

  12. The effect of the obstetrician group and epidural analgesia on the risk for cesarean delivery in nulliparous women

    Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica

    Volume 44, Issue 8, September 2000, Pages: 959–964, Y. Beilin, F. Friedman JR., L. A. Andres, S. Hossain and C. A. Bodian

    Version of Record online : 24 DEC 2001, DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2000.440811.x

  13. Estimating the Rate of Cesarean Section by Maternal Request: Anonymous Survey of Obstetricians in Australia


    Volume 36, Issue 3, September 2009, Pages: 208–212, Stephen J. Robson, Woo Syong Tan, Adebayo Adeyemi and Keith B. G. Dear

    Version of Record online : 8 SEP 2009, DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2009.00331.x

  14. You have free access to this content
    Clinical and sonographic parameters at 37 weeks' gestation for predicting the risk of primary Cesarean delivery in nulliparous women

    Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology

    Volume 36, Issue 4, October 2010, Pages: 486–492, S. N. Kim, K. H. Park, H. J. Jung, J. S. Hong, D. M. Shin and W. S. Kang

    Version of Record online : 9 SEP 2010, DOI: 10.1002/uog.7734

  15. Women's opinions and experiences with induction of labor and cesarean delivery on request in south eastern Nigeria

    International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics

    Volume 103, Issue 2, November 2008, Pages: 158–161, Chibuike Ogwuegbu Chigbu and Cyril Chukwuma Ezenyeaku

    Version of Record online : 20 AUG 2008, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2008.06.006

  16. Cesarean delivery on maternal request in Italy

    International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics

    Volume 84, Issue 2, February 2004, Pages: 169–170, A.L Tranquilli and S.R Giannubilo

    Version of Record online : 25 SEP 2003, DOI: 10.1016/S0020-7292(03)00319-9

  17. Cesarean delivery outcomes from the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Africa

    International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics

    Volume 107, Issue 3, December 2009, Pages: 191–197, Archana Shah, Bukola Fawole, James Machoki M'Imunya, Faouzi Amokrane, Idi Nafiou, Jean-José Wolomby, Kidza Mugerwa, Isilda Neves, Rosemary Nguti, Marius Kublickas and Matthews Mathai

    Version of Record online : 27 SEP 2009, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.08.013

  18. You have free access to this content
    IN THE LITERATURE:Patient-Choice Cesarean Delivery: Really a Choice?


    Volume 34, Issue 1, March 2007, Pages: 89–90, Peter S. Bernstein

    Version of Record online : 26 FEB 2007, DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2006.00151.x

  19. “Cesarean Delivery on Maternal Request”: Was the NIH Conference Based on a Faulty Premise?


    Volume 33, Issue 3, September 2006, Pages: 171–174, Diony Young

    Version of Record online : 29 AUG 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2006.00101.x

  20. Physicians’ Responses to Patient-Requested Cesarean Delivery


    Volume 31, Issue 4, December 2004, Pages: 280–284, Chiara Ghetti, Benjamin K.S. Chan and Jeanne-Marie Guise

    Version of Record online : 25 NOV 2004, DOI: 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2004.00320.x