Search Results

There are 25354 results for: content related to: Neonatal Mortality for Primary Cesarean and Vaginal Births to Low-Risk Women: Application of an “Intention-to-Treat” Model

  1. Practice of Primary Elective Cesarean Upon Maternal Request in the Commonwealth of Virginia

    Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing

    Volume 41, Issue 6, November/December 2012, Pages: 738–746, Bunan Alnaif and Hind Beydoun

    Article first published online : 12 JUL 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2012.01387.x

  2. A Review of Issues Surrounding Medically Elective Cesarean Delivery

    Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing

    Volume 36, Issue 6, November/December 2007, Pages: 605–615, Susan R. Miesnik and Barbara J. Reale

    Article first published online : 26 OCT 2007, DOI: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2007.00196.x

  3. PLANNED PRIMARY CESAREANS RESULT IN MORE HOSPITAL READMISSIONS AND GREATER COSTS COMPARED WITH PLANNED VAGINAL BIRTHS

    Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health

    Volume 52, Issue 4, July-August 2007, Pages: 420–421,

    Article first published online : 24 DEC 2010, DOI: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2007.04.004

  4. You have free access to this content
    Requesting Cesareans without Medical Indications: An Option Being Considered by Young Canadian Women

    Birth

    Volume 39, Issue 1, March 2012, Pages: 39–47, Frances Gallagher, Linda Bell, Guy Waddell, Annie Benoît and Nathalie Côté

    Article first published online : 9 JAN 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2011.00511.x

  5. Clinical Indications Associated With Primary Cesarean Birth

    Nursing for Women's Health

    Volume 18, Issue 3, June/July 2014, Pages: 243–249, Joyce K. Edmonds

    Article first published online : 17 JUN 2014, DOI: 10.1111/1751-486X.12126

  6. Mothers’ Reports of Postpartum Pain Associated with Vaginal and Cesarean Deliveries: Results of a National Survey

    Birth

    Volume 35, Issue 1, March 2008, Pages: 16–24, Eugene Declercq, 1 Deborah K. Cunningham, 1 Cynthia Johnson and 2 Carol Sakala 3

    Article first published online : 27 FEB 2008, DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2007.00207.x

  7. “Cesarean Delivery on Maternal Request”: Was the NIH Conference Based on a Faulty Premise?

    Birth

    Volume 33, Issue 3, September 2006, Pages: 171–174, Diony Young

    Article first published online : 29 AUG 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2006.00101.x

  8. Effect of Preexisting Chronic Disease on Primary Cesarean Delivery Rates by Race for Births in U.S. Military Hospitals, 1999–2002

    Birth

    Volume 31, Issue 3, September 2004, Pages: 165–175, Andrea Linton and Michael R. Peterson

    Article first published online : 27 AUG 2004, DOI: 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2004.00301.x

  9. Patient Choice Cesarean—The Maine Experience

    Birth

    Volume 32, Issue 3, September 2005, Pages: 203–206, Joseph R. Wax, Angelina Cartin, Michael G. Pinette and Jacquelyn Blackstone

    Article first published online : 9 MAR 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2005.370_1.x

  10. You have free access to this content
    IN THE LITERATURE:Patient-Choice Cesarean Delivery: Really a Choice?

    Birth

    Volume 34, Issue 1, March 2007, Pages: 89–90, Peter S. Bernstein

    Article first published online : 26 FEB 2007, DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2006.00151.x

  11. “Suffering Twice”: The Gender Politics of Cesarean Sections in Taiwan

    Medical Anthropology Quarterly

    Volume 28, Issue 3, September 2014, Pages: 399–418, Chen-I Kuan

    Article first published online : 13 JUN 2014, DOI: 10.1111/maq.12103

  12. The University of British Columbia

    Birth

    Volume 40, Issue 2, June 2013, Pages: 143–145, Michael C. Klein

    Article first published online : 14 JUN 2013, DOI: 10.1111/birt.12047

    Corrected by:

    Erratum: Erratum

    Vol. 40, Issue 3, 214, Article first published online: 6 AUG 2013

  13. Surveillance of Cesarean Section Deliveries, New Jersey, 1999–2004

    Birth

    Volume 33, Issue 3, September 2006, Pages: 203–209, Charles E. Denk, Lakota K. Kruse and Neetu J. Jain

    Article first published online : 29 AUG 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2006.00105.x

  14. A Case Study of Maternal Response to the Implied Antepartum Diagnosis of Inevitable Labor Dystocia

    Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing

    Volume 42, Issue 2, March/April 2013, Pages: 138–147, Barbara S. McAlister

    Article first published online : 16 JAN 2013, DOI: 10.1111/1552-6909.12005

  15. Women’s Autonomy and Scheduled Cesarean Sections in Brazil: A Cautionary Tale

    Birth

    Volume 35, Issue 1, March 2008, Pages: 33–40, Joseph E. Potter, 1 Kristine Hopkins, 1 Anibal Faúndes and 2 Ignez Perpétuo 3

    Article first published online : 27 FEB 2008, DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2007.00209.x

  16. Potential avoidability of planned cesarean sections in a French national database

    Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

    Volume 93, Issue 9, September 2014, Pages: 905–912, Benedicte Coulm, Beatrice Blondel, Sophie Alexander, Michel Boulvain and Camille Le Ray

    Article first published online : 23 JUL 2014, DOI: 10.1111/aogs.12439

  17. Effect of Managed Care Enrollment on Primary and Repeat Cesarean Rates Among U.S. Department of Defense Health Care Beneficiaries in Military and Civilian Hospitals Worldwide, 1999–2002

    Birth

    Volume 31, Issue 4, December 2004, Pages: 254–264, Andrea Linton and Michael R. Peterson

    Article first published online : 25 NOV 2004, DOI: 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2004.00317.x

  18. Putting Mothers and Babies at Risk: Promoting the Elusive “Cesarean Delivery on Maternal Request”

    Birth

    Volume 36, Issue 3, September 2009, Pages: 254–257, Nicette Jukelevics

    Article first published online : 8 SEP 2009, DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2009.00332.x

  19. Is a planned cesarean necessary in twin pregnancies?

    Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

    Volume 90, Issue 10, October 2011, Pages: 1147–1156, FRANÇOISE VENDITTELLI, OLIVIER RIVIÈRE, CATHERINE CRENN-HÉBERT, DIDIER RIETHMULLER, JEAN-PATRICK SCHAAL, MICHEL DREYFUS and FOR THE PERINATAL SENTINEL NETWORK AUDIPOG

    Article first published online : 20 MAY 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2011.01130.x

  20. Primigravid Women's Views of Being Approached to Participate in a Hypothetical Term Cephalic Trial of Planned Vaginal Birth versus Planned Cesarean Birth

    Birth

    Volume 36, Issue 3, September 2009, Pages: 213–219, Tina Lavender and Carol Kingdon

    Article first published online : 8 SEP 2009, DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2009.00325.x