Search Results

There are 76882 results for: content related to: Women’s Autonomy and Scheduled Cesarean Sections in Brazil: A Cautionary Tale

  1. Putting Mothers and Babies at Risk: Promoting the Elusive “Cesarean Delivery on Maternal Request”


    Volume 36, Issue 3, September 2009, Pages: 254–257, Nicette Jukelevics

    Version of Record online : 8 SEP 2009, DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2009.00332.x

  2. “Suffering Twice”: The Gender Politics of Cesarean Sections in Taiwan

    Medical Anthropology Quarterly

    Volume 28, Issue 3, September 2014, Pages: 399–418, Chen-I Kuan

    Version of Record online : 13 JUN 2014, DOI: 10.1111/maq.12103

  3. Recommendations for Routine Reporting on Indications for Cesarean Delivery in Developing Countries


    Volume 35, Issue 3, September 2008, Pages: 204–211, Cynthia Stanton, 1 Carine Ronsmans and 2 the Baltimore Group on Cesarean

    Version of Record online : 20 AUG 2008, DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2008.00241.x

  4. Effect of Managed Care Enrollment on Primary and Repeat Cesarean Rates Among U.S. Department of Defense Health Care Beneficiaries in Military and Civilian Hospitals Worldwide, 1999–2002


    Volume 31, Issue 4, December 2004, Pages: 254–264, Andrea Linton and Michael R. Peterson

    Version of Record online : 25 NOV 2004, DOI: 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2004.00317.x

  5. Requesting Cesareans without Medical Indications: An Option Being Considered by Young Canadian Women


    Volume 39, Issue 1, March 2012, Pages: 39–47, Frances Gallagher, Linda Bell, Guy Waddell, Annie Benoît and Nathalie Côté

    Version of Record online : 9 JAN 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2011.00511.x

  6. Practice of Primary Elective Cesarean Upon Maternal Request in the Commonwealth of Virginia

    Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing

    Volume 41, Issue 6, November/December 2012, Pages: 738–746, Bunan Alnaif and Hind Beydoun

    Version of Record online : 12 JUL 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2012.01387.x

  7. Effect of Preexisting Chronic Disease on Primary Cesarean Delivery Rates by Race for Births in U.S. Military Hospitals, 1999–2002


    Volume 31, Issue 3, September 2004, Pages: 165–175, Andrea Linton and Michael R. Peterson

    Version of Record online : 27 AUG 2004, DOI: 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2004.00301.x

  8. Six Years' Experience with Vaginal Births after Cesareans at Booth Maternity Center in Philadelphia


    Volume 11, Issue 1, March 1984, Pages: 5–9, Ruth T. Wilf and John B. Franklin

    Version of Record online : 31 MAR 2007, DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.1984.tb00733.x

  9. Neonatal Mortality for Primary Cesarean and Vaginal Births to Low-Risk Women: Application of an “Intention-to-Treat” Model


    Volume 35, Issue 1, March 2008, Pages: 3–8, Marian F. MacDorman, 1 Eugene Declercq, 2 Fay Menacker and 1 Michael H. Malloy 3

    Version of Record online : 27 FEB 2008, DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2007.00205.x

  10. Vaginal Birth after Cesarean Delivery

    Queenan's Management of High-Risk Pregnancy: An Evidence-Based Approach, Sixth Edition

    John T. Queenan, Catherine Y. Spong, Charles J. Lockwood, Pages: 414–423, 2012

    Published Online : 4 JAN 2012, DOI: 10.1002/9781119963783.ch49

  11. Can the use of cesarean section be regulated?, A review of methods and results

    Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

    Volume 77, Issue 10, October 1998, Pages: 951–960, MereteØstergård Kristensen, Morten Hedegaard and Niels Jørgen Secher

    Version of Record online : 10 JUN 2003, DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0412.1998.771001.x

  12. Efforts to promote vaginal delivery after a previous cesarean section

    Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research

    Volume 38, Issue 1, January 2012, Pages: 113–117, Yoko Hamai and Yukio Imanishi

    Version of Record online : 15 SEP 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2011.01630.x

  13. Potential avoidability of planned cesarean sections in a French national database

    Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

    Volume 93, Issue 9, September 2014, Pages: 905–912, Benedicte Coulm, Beatrice Blondel, Sophie Alexander, Michel Boulvain and Camille Le Ray

    Version of Record online : 23 JUL 2014, DOI: 10.1111/aogs.12439

  14. Increasing Cesarean Section Rates: Exploring the Role of Culture in an Australian Community


    Volume 31, Issue 2, June 2004, Pages: 117–124, Ruth Walker, Deborah Turnbull and Chris Wilkinson

    Version of Record online : 21 MAY 2004, DOI: 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2004.00289.x

  15. Mothers’ Reports of Postpartum Pain Associated with Vaginal and Cesarean Deliveries: Results of a National Survey


    Volume 35, Issue 1, March 2008, Pages: 16–24, Eugene Declercq, 1 Deborah K. Cunningham, 1 Cynthia Johnson and 2 Carol Sakala 3

    Version of Record online : 27 FEB 2008, DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2007.00207.x

  16. Patient-Perceived Pressure from Clinicians for Labor Induction and Cesarean Delivery: A Population-Based Survey of U.S. Women

    Health Services Research

    Volume 50, Issue 4, August 2015, Pages: 961–981, Judy Jou, Katy B. Kozhimannil, Pamela Jo Johnson and Carol Sakala

    Version of Record online : 23 SEP 2014, DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12231

  17. Is the Patient Always Right?

    Hastings Center Report

    Volume 34, Issue 2, March-April 2004, Pages: 13–14,

    Version of Record online : 6 MAR 2012, DOI: 10.2307/3527680

  18. Fear of Childbirth and Risk of Cesarean Delivery: A Cohort Study in Six European Countries


    Volume 42, Issue 1, March 2015, Pages: 48–55, Elsa Lena Ryding, Mirjam Lukasse, An-Sophie Van Parys, Anne-Marie Wangel, Helle Karro, Hildur Kristjansdottir, Anne-Mette Schroll, Berit Schei and on behalf of the Bidens Group

    Version of Record online : 13 FEB 2015, DOI: 10.1111/birt.12147

  19. Surveillance of Cesarean Section Deliveries, New Jersey, 1999–2004


    Volume 33, Issue 3, September 2006, Pages: 203–209, Charles E. Denk, Lakota K. Kruse and Neetu J. Jain

    Version of Record online : 29 AUG 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2006.00105.x

  20. A Case Study of Maternal Response to the Implied Antepartum Diagnosis of Inevitable Labor Dystocia

    Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing

    Volume 42, Issue 2, March/April 2013, Pages: 138–147, Barbara S. McAlister

    Version of Record online : 16 JAN 2013, DOI: 10.1111/1552-6909.12005