Search Results

There are 53351 results for: content related to: Politics and Scientific Expertise: Scientists, Risk Perception, and Nuclear Waste Policy

  1. Perceived Risk and Benefit of Nuclear Waste Repositories: Four Opinion Clusters

    Risk Analysis

    Volume 33, Issue 6, June 2013, Pages: 1038–1048, Roman Seidl, Corinne Moser, Michael Stauffacher and Pius Krütli

    Version of Record online : 28 SEP 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01897.x

  2. Trust in Risk Management: A Model-Based Review of Empirical Research

    Risk Analysis

    Volume 30, Issue 4, April 2010, Pages: 541–574, Timothy C. Earle

    Version of Record online : 12 APR 2010, DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01398.x

  3. Risk perception and the location of a repository for spent nuclear fuel

    Scandinavian Journal of Psychology

    Volume 36, Issue 1, March 1995, Pages: 25–36, ANDERS BIEL and ULF DAHLSTRAND

    Version of Record online : 28 JUN 2008, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.1995.tb00965.x

  4. Limits of Knowledge and the Limited Importance of Trust

    Risk Analysis

    Volume 21, Issue 1, February 2001, Pages: 189–198, Lennart Sjöberg

    Version of Record online : 24 MAY 2002, DOI: 10.1111/0272-4332.211101

  5. Three Decades of Social Science Research on High-Level Nuclear Waste: Achievements and Future Challenges

    Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy

    Volume 1, Issue 4, November 2010, Pages: 13–47, Barry D. Solomon, Mats Andrén and Urban Strandberg

    Version of Record online : 10 AUG 2012, DOI: 10.2202/1944-4079.1036

  6. Cultural approach to the perception of risk: analysing concern about the siting of a high-level nuclear waste facility in Finland

    Waste Management and Research

    Volume 17, Issue 3, June 1999, Pages: 212–219, Tapio Litmanen

    Version of Record online : 13 JAN 2002, DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-3070.1999.00023.x

  7. A Framework for Understanding Risk Perception, Explored from the Perspective of the Water Practitioner

    Risk Analysis

    Volume 34, Issue 2, February 2014, Pages: 294–308, Meredith Frances Dobbie and Rebekah Ruth Brown

    Version of Record online : 5 AUG 2013, DOI: 10.1111/risa.12100

  8. Reversing Nuclear Opposition: Evolving Public Acceptance of a Permanent Nuclear Waste Disposal Facility

    Risk Analysis

    Volume 31, Issue 4, April 2011, Pages: 629–644, Hank C. Jenkins-Smith, Carol L. Silva, Matthew C. Nowlin and Grant deLozier

    Version of Record online : 22 DEC 2010, DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01543.x


    Journal of Social Philosophy

    Volume 25, Issue s1, June 1994, Pages: 45–70, K. S. Shrader-Frechette

    Version of Record online : 30 APR 2008, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9833.1994.tb00348.x

  10. Public Opposition To The Siting Of The High-Level Nuclear Waste Repository: The Importance Of Trust

    Review of Policy Research

    Volume 10, Issue 4, December 1991, Pages: 180–194, K. David Pijawka and Alvin H. Mushkatel

    Version of Record online : 24 JUN 2005, DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.1991.tb00289.x

  11. Attitudes and Risk Perceptions of Stakeholders in a Nuclear Waste Siting Issue

    Risk Analysis

    Volume 23, Issue 4, August 2003, Pages: 739–749, Lennart Sjöberg

    Version of Record online : 11 JUL 2003, DOI: 10.1111/1539-6924.00352

  12. An Empirical Study of the Toxic Capsule Crisis in China: Risk Perceptions and Behavioral Responses

    Risk Analysis

    Volume 34, Issue 4, April 2014, Pages: 698–710, Tianjun Feng, L. Robin Keller, Ping Wu and Yifan Xu

    Version of Record online : 16 JUL 2013, DOI: 10.1111/risa.12099

  13. Factors in Risk Perception

    Risk Analysis

    Volume 20, Issue 1, February 2000, Pages: 1–12, Lennart Sjöberg

    Version of Record online : 23 MAY 2002, DOI: 10.1111/0272-4332.00001

  14. Decidedly Different: Expert and Public Views of Risks from a Radioactive Waste Repository

    Risk Analysis

    Volume 13, Issue 6, December 1993, Pages: 643–648, James Flynn, Paul Slovic and C. K. Mertz

    Version of Record online : 29 MAY 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1993.tb01326.x

  15. Perceived Risks of Radioactive Waste Transport Through Oregon: Results of a Statewide Survey

    Risk Analysis

    Volume 14, Issue 1, February 1994, Pages: 5–14, Donald MacGregor, Paul Slovic, Robert G. Mason, John Detweiler, Stephen E. Binney and Brian Dodd

    Version of Record online : 29 MAY 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00022.x

  16. What Do Lay People Want to Know About the Disposal of Nuclear Waste? A Mental Model Approach to the Design and Development of an Online Risk Communication

    Risk Analysis

    Volume 32, Issue 9, September 2012, Pages: 1496–1511, A. Skarlatidou, T. Cheng and M. Haklay

    Version of Record online : 10 FEB 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01773.x

  17. Risk Perception in Context: The Savannah River Site Stakeholder Study

    Risk Analysis

    Volume 19, Issue 6, December 1999, Pages: 1019–1035, Bryan L. Williams, Sylvia Brown, Michael Greenberg and Mokbul A. Kahn

    Version of Record online : 29 MAY 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1999.tb01125.x

  18. Context, Cultural Bias, and Health Risk Perception: The “Everyday” Nature of Pesticide Policy Preferences in London, Calgary, and Halifax

    Risk Analysis

    Volume 31, Issue 5, May 2011, Pages: 847–865, Rachel A. Hirsch and Jamie Baxter

    Version of Record online : 13 JAN 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01560.x

  19. Risk and Climate Change: Perceptions of Key Policy Actors in Canada

    Risk Analysis

    Volume 24, Issue 5, October 2004, Pages: 1395–1406, Richard C. Stedman

    Version of Record online : 2 DEC 2004, DOI: 10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00534.x

  20. Local Acceptance of a High-Level Nuclear Waste Repository

    Risk Analysis

    Volume 24, Issue 3, June 2004, Pages: 737–749, Lennart Sjöberg

    Version of Record online : 22 JUN 2004, DOI: 10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00472.x