Search Results

There are 52434 results for: content related to: Cognitive Biases and the Strength of Political Arguments

  1. The Effect of Acknowledging Mock Jurors' Feelings on Affective and Cognitive Biases: It Depends on the Sample

    Behavioral Sciences & the Law

    Volume 29, Issue 3, May/June 2011, Pages: 331–357, John G. McCabe and Daniel A. Krauss

    Version of Record online : 15 JUL 2011, DOI: 10.1002/bsl.990

  2. Audit Programs and Audit Risk: A Study of Japanese Practice

    International Journal of Auditing

    Volume 10, Issue 1, March 2006, Pages: 41–65, Hironori Fukukawa, Theodore J. Mock and Arnold Wright

    Version of Record online : 31 AUG 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1099-1123.2006.00298.x

  3. Evidence-informed person-centered healthcare part I: Do ‘cognitive biases plus’ at organizational levels influence quality of evidence?

    Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice

    Volume 20, Issue 6, December 2014, Pages: 734–747, Shashi S. Seshia, Michael Makhinson, Dawn F. Phillips and G. Bryan Young

    Version of Record online : 28 NOV 2014, DOI: 10.1111/jep.12280

  4. Can Anchoring and Loss Aversion Explain the Predictability of Housing Prices?

    Pacific Economic Review

    Volume 18, Issue 1, February 2013, Pages: 41–59, Tin Cheuk Leung and Kwok Ping Tsang

    Version of Record online : 3 FEB 2013, DOI: 10.1111/1468-0106.12009

  5. Is There an Informative Effect of Law? An Experimental Test

    Journal of Law and Society

    Volume 41, Issue 4, December 2014, Pages: 576–603, José A. Noguera, Jordi Tena-Sánchez and Francisco J. León

    Version of Record online : 27 NOV 2014, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6478.2014.00686.x

  6. The Persuasiveness of Source Credibility: A Critical Review of Five Decades' Evidence

    Journal of Applied Social Psychology

    Volume 34, Issue 2, February 2004, Pages: 243–281, Chanthika Pornpitakpan

    Version of Record online : 31 JUL 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02547.x

  7. Cognitive Biases and Strategic Decision Processes: An Integrative Perspective

    Journal of Management Studies

    Volume 36, Issue 6, November 1999, Pages: 757–778, T.K. Das and Bing-Sheng Teng

    Version of Record online : 16 DEC 2002, DOI: 10.1111/1467-6486.00157

  8. Does changing the order of threat and efficacy information influence the persuasiveness of threat messages?

    British Journal of Health Psychology

    Volume 11, Issue 2, May 2006, Pages: 333–343, Sue Hall, Amanda J. Bishop and Theresa M. Marteau

    Version of Record online : 24 DEC 2010, DOI: 10.1348/135910705X52282

  9. The Effects of Fraud and Going-concern Risk on Auditors' Assessments of the Risk of Material Misstatement and Resulting Audit Procedures

    International Journal of Auditing

    Volume 11, Issue 3, November 2007, Pages: 149–163, Allen D. Blay, L. Dwight Sneathen Jr and Tim Kizirian

    Version of Record online : 28 NOV 2007, DOI: 10.1111/j.1099-1123.2007.00362.x

  10. Libertarian Paternalism, Externalities, and the “Spirit of Liberty”: How Thaler and Sunstein Are Nudging Us toward an “Overlapping Consensus”

    Law & Social Inquiry

    Volume 36, Issue 1, Winter 2011, Pages: 263–295, Anuj C. Desai

    Version of Record online : 21 FEB 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-4469.2010.01231.x

  11. Social Distance, Framing, and Judgment: A Construal Level Perspective

    Human Communication Research

    Volume 33, Issue 4, October 2007, Pages: 489–514, Xiaoli Nan

    Version of Record online : 17 SEP 2007, DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00309.x

  12. The persuasiveness of online safety cues: The impact of prevention focus compatibility of Web content on consumers' risk perceptions, attitudes, and intentions

    Journal of Interactive Marketing

    Volume 22, Issue 4, Autumn (Fall) 2008, Pages: 58–72, Guda Van Noort, Peter Kerkhof and Bob M. Fennis

    Version of Record online : 5 NOV 2008, DOI: 10.1002/dir.20121

  13. What to Get and What to Give Up: How Different Decision Tasks and Product Types Affect the Persuasiveness of Promotion- versus Prevention-Focused Messages

    Psychology & Marketing

    Volume 32, Issue 9, September 2015, Pages: 920–933, Tilottama Ghosh Chowdhury, Camelia Micu, S. Ratneshwar and Eunjin (Anna) Kim

    Version of Record online : 11 AUG 2015, DOI: 10.1002/mar.20827

  14. A Narrative Policy Framework: Clear Enough to Be Wrong?

    Policy Studies Journal

    Volume 38, Issue 2, May 2010, Pages: 329–353, Michael D. Jones and Mark K. McBeth

    Version of Record online : 23 APR 2010, DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00364.x

  15. Metaphor and Persuasive Communication: A Multifunctional Approach

    Social and Personality Psychology Compass

    Volume 4, Issue 9, September 2010, Pages: 783–794, Victor C. Ottati and Randall A. Renstrom

    Version of Record online : 2 SEP 2010, DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00292.x

  16. A Meta-Analysis of the ELM's Argument Quality × Processing Type Predictions

    Human Communication Research

    Volume 41, Issue 4, October 2015, Pages: 501–534, Christopher J. Carpenter

    Version of Record online : 5 DEC 2014, DOI: 10.1111/hcre.12054

  17. Aging and the effects of emotion on cognition: Implications for psychological interventions for depression and anxiety

    PsyCh Journal

    Volume 4, Issue 1, March 2015, Pages: 11–19, Bob G. Knight and Kelly Durbin

    Version of Record online : 30 JAN 2015, DOI: 10.1002/pchj.84

  18. The Imperative of Non-ideal Theory

    Political Studies Review

    Volume 12, Issue 3, September 2014, Pages: 361–368, Jack Knight

    Version of Record online : 14 AUG 2014, DOI: 10.1111/1478-9302.12061

  19. The Evolution of Cognitive Bias

    The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology

    Martie G. Haselton, Daniel Nettle, Paul W. Andrews, Pages: 724–746, 2015

    Published Online : 8 SEP 2015, DOI: 10.1002/9780470939376.ch25

  20. Approach Bias Modification in Food Craving—A Proof-of-Concept Study

    European Eating Disorders Review

    Volume 23, Issue 5, September 2015, Pages: 352–360, Timo Brockmeyer, Carolyn Hahn, Christina Reetz, Ulrike Schmidt and Hans-Christoph Friederich

    Version of Record online : 2 JUL 2015, DOI: 10.1002/erv.2382