Search Results

There are 54779 results for: content related to: Three Bush Administration Management Reform Initiatives: The President’s Management Agenda, Freedom to Manage Legislative Proposals, and the Program Assessment Rating Tool

  1. Federal Government Reform: Lessons from Clinton’s “Reinventing Government” and Bush’s “Management Agenda” Initiatives

    Public Administration Review

    Volume 68, Issue 6, November|December 2008, Pages: 1009–1026, Jonathan D. Breul and John M. Kamensky

    Version of Record online : 17 OCT 2008, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00950.x

  2. How Credible Is the Evidence, and Does It Matter? An Analysis of the Program Assessment Rating Tool

    Public Administration Review

    Volume 72, Issue 1, January/February 2012, Pages: 123–134, Carolyn J. Heinrich

    Version of Record online : 11 NOV 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02490.x

  3. Playing the Wrong PART: The Program Assessment Rating Tool and the Functions of the President's Budget

    Public Administration Review

    Volume 72, Issue 1, January/February 2012, Pages: 112–121, Joseph White

    Version of Record online : 11 NOV 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02484.x

  4. Does Involvement in Performance Management Routines Encourage Performance Information Use? Evaluating GPRA and PART

    Public Administration Review

    Volume 72, Issue 4, July/August 2012, Pages: 592–602, Donald P. Moynihan and Stéphane Lavertu

    Version of Record online : 10 MAY 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02539.x

  5. Improving the Managerial Capacity of the Federal Government: A Public Administration Agenda for the Next President

    Public Administration Review

    Volume 68, Issue 6, November|December 2008, Pages: 1027–1036, Thomas H. Stanton

    Version of Record online : 17 OCT 2008, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00951.x

  6. The Obama Administration and PBB: Building on the Legacy of Federal Performance-Informed Budgeting?

    Public Administration Review

    Volume 71, Issue 3, May/June 2011, Pages: 356–367, Philip G. Joyce

    Version of Record online : 9 MAY 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02355.x

  7. Performance-Based Budgeting: The Contribution of the Program Assessment Rating Tool

    Public Budgeting & Finance

    Volume 26, Issue 4, Winter 2006, Pages: 79–88, PATRICK R. MULLEN

    Version of Record online : 10 NOV 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5850.2006.00863.x

  8. The Continuity of Change: Public Budgeting and Finance Reforms over 70 Years

    Public Administration Review

    Volume 67, Issue 6, November|December 2007, Pages: 1018–1029, Paul L. Posner

    Version of Record online : 20 NOV 2007, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00793.x

  9. Reinventing Reforms: How to Improve Program Management Using Performance Measures. Really

    Public Budgeting & Finance

    Volume 30, Issue 3, Fall 2010, Pages: 51–78, STUART KASDIN

    Version of Record online : 3 SEP 2010, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5850.2010.00962.x

  10. PART in Retrospect: An Examination of Legislators' Attitudes Toward PART

    Public Budgeting & Finance

    Volume 31, Issue 2, Summer 2011, Pages: 1–21, ODD J. STALEBRINK and VELDA FRISCO

    Version of Record online : 8 JUN 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5850.2011.00977.x

  11. Extending the Theory of Goal Ambiguity to Programs: Examining the Relationship between Goal Ambiguity and Performance

    Public Administration Review

    Volume 74, Issue 2, March/April 2014, Pages: 205–219, Chan Su Jung

    Version of Record online : 27 FEB 2014, DOI: 10.1111/puar.12176

  12. Does Performance Budgeting Work? An Examination of the Office of Management and Budget’s PART Scores

    Public Administration Review

    Volume 66, Issue 5, September|October 2006, Pages: 742–752, John B. Gilmour and David E. Lewis

    Version of Record online : 7 SEP 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00639.x

  13. Public Administration Review

    Public Administration Review

    Volume 67, Issue 6, November|December 2007, Pages: 1098–1111,

    Version of Record online : 7 DEC 2007, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00829.x

  14. Federalist No. 71: Can the Federal Government Be Held Accountable for Performance?

    Public Administration Review

    Volume 71, Issue s1, December 2011, Pages: s128–s134, Beryl A. Radin

    Version of Record online : 14 NOV 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02472.x

  15. NOAA's Resurrection of Program Budgeting: Déjà Vu All Over Again?

    Public Administration Review

    Volume 69, Issue 3, May/June 2009, Pages: 435–447, William F. West, Eric Lindquist and Katrina N. Mosher-Howe

    Version of Record online : 15 APR 2009, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.01990.x

  16. Does Training Matter? Evidence from Performance Management Reforms

    Public Administration Review

    Volume 75, Issue 3, May/June 2015, Pages: 411–420, Alexander Kroll and Donald P. Moynihan

    Version of Record online : 3 FEB 2015, DOI: 10.1111/puar.12331

  17. Measuring How Administration Shapes Citizenship: A Policy Feedback Perspective on Performance Management

    Public Administration Review

    Volume 68, Issue 5, September|October 2008, Pages: 908–920, Amber Wichowsky and Donald P. Moynihan

    Version of Record online : 5 AUG 2008, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00931.x

  18. Transitions in Defense Management Reform: A Review of the Government Accountability Office’s Chief Management Officer Recommendation and Comments for the New Administration

    Public Administration Review

    Volume 68, Issue 6, November|December 2008, Pages: 1043–1049, Philip J. Candreva and Douglas A. Brook

    Version of Record online : 17 OCT 2008, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00953.x

  19. Government Reform, Political Ideology, and Administrative Burden: The Case of Performance Management in the Bush Administration

    Public Administration Review

    Volume 73, Issue 6, November/December 2013, Pages: 845–857, Stéphane Lavertu, David E. Lewis and Donald P. Moynihan

    Version of Record online : 16 OCT 2013, DOI: 10.1111/puar.12132

  20. Business Management Reform in the Department of Defense in Anticipation of Declining Budgets

    Public Budgeting & Finance

    Volume 27, Issue 3, Fall 2007, Pages: 50–70, DOUGLAS A. BROOK and PHILIP J. CANDREVA

    Version of Record online : 30 AUG 2007, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5850.2007.00882.x