Search Results

There are 19430 results for: content related to: Predicting Treatment Effect from Surrogate Endpoints and Historical Trials: An Extrapolation Involving Probabilities of a Binary Outcome or Survival to a Specific Time

  1. Meta-analysis for Surrogacy: Accelerated Failure Time Models and Semicompeting Risks Modeling

    Biometrics

    Volume 68, Issue 1, March 2012, Pages: 226–232, Debashis Ghosh, Jeremy M. G. Taylor and Daniel J. Sargent

    Version of Record online : 13 JUN 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01633.x

  2. Discussions

    Biometrics

    Volume 68, Issue 1, March 2012, Pages: 239–241, Vance W. Berger, Grant Izmirlian and Diana Knoll

    Version of Record online : 22 JUN 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01636.x

  3. Discussion of the Paper of Ghosh, Taylor, and Sargent

    Biometrics

    Volume 68, Issue 1, March 2012, Pages: 236–238, Edward L. Korn

    Version of Record online : 13 JUN 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01635.x

  4. Surrogate Marker Evaluation from an Information Theory Perspective

    Biometrics

    Volume 63, Issue 1, March 2007, Pages: 180–186, Ariel Alonso and Geert Molenberghs

    Version of Record online : 24 AUG 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2006.00634.x

  5. Related Causal Frameworks for Surrogate Outcomes

    Biometrics

    Volume 65, Issue 2, June 2009, Pages: 530–538, Marshall M. Joffe and Tom Greene

    Version of Record online : 27 AUG 2008, DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2008.01106.x

  6. On Assessing Surrogacy in a Single Trial Setting Using a Semicompeting Risks Paradigm

    Biometrics

    Volume 65, Issue 2, June 2009, Pages: 521–529, Debashis Ghosh

    Version of Record online : 27 AUG 2008, DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2008.01109.x

  7. Discussion by O'Quigley and Flandre

    Biometrics

    Volume 68, Issue 1, March 2012, Pages: 242–244, John O'Quigley and Philippe Flandre

    Version of Record online : 13 JUN 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01637.x

  8. An investigation into the two-stage meta-analytic copula modelling approach for evaluating time-to-event surrogate endpoints which comprise of one or more events of interest

    Pharmaceutical Statistics

    Natalie Dimier and Susan Todd

    Version of Record online : 19 MAY 2017, DOI: 10.1002/pst.1812

  9. Validation of Surrogate Markers in Multiple Randomized Clinical Trials with Repeated Measurements: Canonical Correlation Approach

    Biometrics

    Volume 60, Issue 4, December 2004, Pages: 845–853, Ariel Alonso, Helena Geys, Geert Molenberghs, Michael G. Kenward and Tony Vangeneugden

    Version of Record online : 6 DEC 2004, DOI: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2004.00239.x

  10. Surrogate threshold effect: an alternative measure for meta-analytic surrogate endpoint validation

    Pharmaceutical Statistics

    Volume 5, Issue 3, July/September 2006, Pages: 173–186, Tomasz Burzykowski and Marc Buyse

    Version of Record online : 10 MAY 2006, DOI: 10.1002/pst.207

  11. Semiparametric Inference for Surrogate Endpoints with Bivariate Censored Data

    Biometrics

    Volume 64, Issue 1, March 2008, Pages: 149–156, Debashis Ghosh

    Version of Record online : 25 JUL 2007, DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00834.x

  12. Statistical evaluation of surrogate endpoints with examples from cancer clinical trials

    Biometrical Journal

    Volume 58, Issue 1, January 2016, Pages: 104–132, Marc Buyse, Geert Molenberghs, Xavier Paoletti, Koji Oba, Ariel Alonso, Wim Van der Elst and Tomasz Burzykowski

    Version of Record online : 12 FEB 2015, DOI: 10.1002/bimj.201400049

  13. Rejoinder for “Meta-analysis for Surrogacy: Accelerated Failure Time Models and Semicompeting Risks Modeling”

    Biometrics

    Volume 68, Issue 1, March 2012, Pages: 245–247, Debashis Ghosh, Jeremy M. G. Taylor and Daniel J. Sargent

    Version of Record online : 13 JUN 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01638.x

  14. Fitting Conditional Survival Models to Meta-Analytic Data by Using a Transformation Toward Mixed-Effects Models

    Biometrics

    Volume 64, Issue 3, September 2008, Pages: 834–842, Goele Massonnet, Paul Janssen and Tomasz Burzykowski

    Version of Record online : 4 JAN 2008, DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00960.x

  15. Comparing Biomarkers as Principal Surrogate Endpoints

    Biometrics

    Volume 67, Issue 4, December 2011, Pages: 1442–1451, Ying Huang and Peter B. Gilbert

    Version of Record online : 22 APR 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01603.x

  16. Discussion Contribution to 091037PR4 (Ghosh, Taylor, and Sargent)

    Biometrics

    Volume 68, Issue 1, March 2012, Pages: 233–235, Geert Molenberghs

    Version of Record online : 13 JUN 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01634.x

  17. Surrogate Markers

    Standard Article

    Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online

    Geert Molenberghs

    Published Online : 16 SEP 2015, DOI: 10.1002/9781118445112.stat00324.pub2

  18. You have free access to this content
    On the relationship between the causal-inference and meta-analytic paradigms for the validation of surrogate endpoints

    Biometrics

    Volume 71, Issue 1, March 2015, Pages: 15–24, Ariel Alonso, Wim Van der Elst, Geert Molenberghs, Marc Buyse and Tomasz Burzykowski

    Version of Record online : 1 OCT 2014, DOI: 10.1111/biom.12245

  19. Evaluating Correlation-Based Metric for Surrogate Marker Qualification within a Causal Correlation Framework

    Biometrics

    Volume 68, Issue 2, June 2012, Pages: 617–627, Yue Wang, Robin Mogg and Jared Lunceford

    Version of Record online : 7 NOV 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01682.x

  20. Design and Estimation for Evaluating Principal Surrogate Markers in Vaccine Trials

    Biometrics

    Volume 69, Issue 2, June 2013, Pages: 301–309, Ying Huang, Peter B. Gilbert and Julian Wolfson

    Version of Record online : 14 FEB 2013, DOI: 10.1111/biom.12014