Search Results


  1. You have free access to this content
    Do nonattenders in mammography screening programmes seek mammography elsewhere?

    International Journal of Cancer

    Volume 113, Issue 3, 20 January 2005, Pages: 464–470, Allan Jensen, Anne Helene Olsen, My von Euler-Chelpin, Sisse Helle Njor, Ilse Vejborg and Elsebeth Lynge

    Version of Record online : 28 SEP 2004, DOI: 10.1002/ijc.20604

  2. You have free access to this content
    Diagnostic mammography performance and race


    Volume 104, Issue 12, 15 December 2005, Pages: 2671–2681, Bonnie C. Yankaskas and Karminder S. Gill

    Version of Record online : 15 NOV 2005, DOI: 10.1002/cncr.21550

  3. You have free access to this content
    Trends in breast biopsy pathology diagnoses among women undergoing mammography in the United States: A report from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium


    Volume 121, Issue 9, May 1, 2015, Pages: 1369–1378, Kimberly H. Allison, Linn A. Abraham, Donald L. Weaver, Anna N. A. Tosteson, Heidi D. Nelson, Tracy Onega, Berta M. Geller, Karla Kerlikowske, Patricia A. Carney, Laura E. Ichikawa, Diana S. M. Buist and Joann G. Elmore

    Version of Record online : 20 JAN 2015, DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29199

  4. You have free access to this content
    The impact of Medicaid coverage and reimbursement on access to diagnostic mammography


    Volume 115, Issue 23, 1 December 2009, Pages: 5566–5578, Jeremiah D. Schuur, Akash Shah, Zheyang Wu, Howard P. Forman and Cary P. Gross

    Version of Record online : 2 SEP 2009, DOI: 10.1002/cncr.24637

  5. Using Medicare Data to Estimate the Prevalence of Breast Cancer Screening in Older Women: Comparison of Different Methods to Identify Screening Mammograms

    Health Services Research

    Volume 37, Issue 6, December 2002, Pages: 1643–1657, Whitney M Randolph, Jonathan D Mahnken, James S Goodwin and Jean L Freeman

    Version of Record online : 18 DEC 2002, DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.10912

  6. You have free access to this content
    Performance of diagnostic mammography differs in the United States and Denmark

    International Journal of Cancer

    Volume 127, Issue 8, 15 October 2010, Pages: 1905–1912, Allan Jensen, Berta M. Geller, Charlotte C. Gard, Diana L. Miglioretti, Bonnie Yankaskas, Patricia A. Carney, Robert D. Rosenberg, Ilse Vejborg and Elsebeth Lynge

    Version of Record online : 26 JAN 2010, DOI: 10.1002/ijc.25198

  7. You have free access to this content
    Increased Patient Concern After False-positive Mammograms

    Journal of General Internal Medicine

    Volume 16, Issue 3, March 2001, Pages: 150–156, Mary B. Barton, Sara Moore, Sarah Polk, Ernest Shtatland, Joann G. Elmore and Suzanne W. Fletcher

    Version of Record online : 9 JUN 2004, DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2001.00329.x

  8. You have free access to this content
    Characteristics of primary care physicians and their practices associated with mammography rates for older women


    Volume 98, Issue 9, 1 November 2003, Pages: 1822–1829, R. Van Harrison, Nancy K. Janz, Robert A. Wolfe, Philip J. Tedeschi, Jeoffrey K. Stross, Xuelin Huang and Laurence F. McMahon Jr.

    Version of Record online : 25 SEP 2003, DOI: 10.1002/cncr.11744

  9. Variability in Mammography Use Among Older Women

    Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

    Volume 44, Issue 8, August 1996, Pages: 922–926, Risa B. Burns, Ellen P. McCarthy, Karen M. Freund, Sandra L. Marwill, Michael Shwartz, Arlene Ash and Mark A. Moskowitz

    Version of Record online : 27 APR 2015, DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1996.tb01861.x

  10. You have full text access to this Open Access content
    Cost and cost-effectiveness of digital mammography compared with film-screen mammography in Australia

    Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health

    Volume 33, Issue 5, October 2009, Pages: 430–436, Shuhong Wang, Tracy Merlin, Florian Kreisz, Paul Craft and Janet E. Hiller

    Version of Record online : 6 OCT 2009, DOI: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2009.00424.x

  11. Assessing Accuracy of Mammography in the Presence of Verification Bias and Intrareader Correlation


    Volume 61, Issue 1, March 2005, Pages: 259–268, Yingye Zheng, William E. Barlow and Gary Cutter

    Version of Record online : 28 FEB 2005, DOI: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2005.031139.x

  12. You have free access to this content
    Increased mammography use and its impact on earlier breast cancer detection in Vermont, 1975–1999


    Volume 94, Issue 8, 15 April 2002, Pages: 2160–2168, Pamela M. Vacek, Berta M. Geller, Donald L. Weaver and Roger S. Foster Jr.

    Version of Record online : 15 APR 2002, DOI: 10.1002/cncr.10459

  13. Timing the Use of Breast Cancer Risk Information in Biopsy Decision-Making

    Production and Operations Management

    Volume 26, Issue 7, July 2017, Pages: 1333–1358, Mehmet Ulvi Saygi Ayvaci, Mehmet Eren Ahsen, Srinivasan Raghunathan and Zahra Gharibi

    Version of Record online : 23 FEB 2017, DOI: 10.1111/poms.12679

  14. You have free access to this content
    Mammographic density is the main correlate of tumors detected on ultrasound but not on mammography

    International Journal of Cancer

    Volume 139, Issue 9, 01 November 2016, Pages: 1967–1974, Lothar Häberle, Peter A. Fasching, Barbara Brehm, Katharina Heusinger, Sebastian M. Jud, Christian R. Loehberg, Carolin C. Hack, Caroline Preuss, Michael P. Lux, Arndt Hartmann, Celine M. Vachon, Martina Meier-Meitinger, Michael Uder, Matthias W. Beckmann and Rüdiger Schulz-Wendtland

    Version of Record online : 19 JUL 2016, DOI: 10.1002/ijc.30261

  15. You have free access to this content
    Survival of women ages 40-49 years with breast carcinoma according to method of detection


    Volume 79, Issue 10, 15 May 1997, Pages: 1923–1932, Carol P. McPherson, Karen K. Swenson, Gail Jolitz and Charles L. Murray

    Version of Record online : 29 SEP 2000, DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19970515)79:10<1923::AID-CNCR13>3.0.CO;2-X

  16. You have free access to this content
    Why do large breast cancers still present in a population offered screening?

    International Journal of Cancer

    Volume 123, Issue 12, 15 December 2008, Pages: 2907–2914, Anne Kricker, Beth Newman, Dorota M. Gertig, Chris Goumas, Jane Armes and Bruce K. Armstrong

    Version of Record online : 3 SEP 2008, DOI: 10.1002/ijc.23829

  17. Using semi-Markov processes to study timeliness and tests used in the diagnostic evaluation of suspected breast cancer

    Statistics in Medicine

    Volume 35, Issue 27, 30 November 2016, Pages: 4980–4993, R. A. Hubbard, J. Lange, Y. Zhang, B. A. Salim, J. R. Stroud and L. Y. T. Inoue

    Version of Record online : 21 JUL 2016, DOI: 10.1002/sim.7055

  18. You have free access to this content
    American Cancer Society Guidelines for Breast Cancer Screening: Update 2003

    CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians

    Volume 53, Issue 3, May/June 2003, Pages: 141–169, Dr. Robert A. Smith, Dr. Debbie Saslow, Kimberly Andrews Sawyer, Dr. Wylie Burke, Dr. Mary E. Costanza, Dr. W. Phil Evans III, Dr. Roger S. Foster Jr., Dr. Edward Hendrick, Dr. Harmon J. Eyre and Ms., Dr. Steven Sener

    Version of Record online : 31 DEC 2008, DOI: 10.3322/canjclin.53.3.141

  19. The Potential Role of Dedicated 3D Breast CT as a Diagnostic Tool: Review and Early Clinical Examples

    The Breast Journal

    Volume 20, Issue 6, November/December 2014, Pages: 592–605, Avice M. O'Connell, Andrew Karellas and Srinivasan Vedantham

    Version of Record online : 8 SEP 2014, DOI: 10.1111/tbj.12327

  20. You have free access to this content
    Performance of clinical mammography: A nationwide study from Denmark

    International Journal of Cancer

    Volume 119, Issue 1, 1 July 2006, Pages: 183–191, Allan Jensen, Ilse Vejborg, Niels Severinsen, Susanne Nielsen, Fritz Rank, Gerd Just Mikkelsen, Jørgen Hilden, Dorte Vistisen, Uffe Dyreborg and Elsebeth Lynge

    Version of Record online : 31 JAN 2006, DOI: 10.1002/ijc.21811