Search Results

There are 171590 results for: content related to: Individual and Group Decisions in Response to a Mock Trial: A Methodological Note 1

  1. Do Jurors Give Appropriate Weight to Forensic Identification Evidence?

    Journal of Empirical Legal Studies

    Volume 10, Issue 2, June 2013, Pages: 359–397, William C. Thompson, Suzanne O. Kaasa and Tiamoyo Peterson

    Version of Record online : 18 APR 2013, DOI: 10.1111/jels.12013

  2. Damage Anchors on Real Juries

    Journal of Empirical Legal Studies

    Volume 8, Issue s1, December 2011, Pages: 148–178, Shari Seidman Diamond, Mary R. Rose, Beth Murphy and John Meixner

    Version of Record online : 22 NOV 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2011.01232.x

  3. The American Trial Jury on Trial: Empirical Evidence and Procedural Modifications

    Journal of Social Issues

    Volume 34, Issue 4, Fall 1978, Pages: 137–164, Lawrence S. Wrightsman

    Version of Record online : 14 APR 2010, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1978.tb00780.x

  4. Playing the race card: Making race salient in defence opening and closing statements

    Legal and Criminological Psychology

    Volume 15, Issue 2, September 2010, Pages: 293–303, Donald O. Bucolo and Ellen S. Cohn

    Version of Record online : 24 DEC 2010, DOI: 10.1348/135532508X400824

  5. ‘Telling tales’: exploring narratives of life and law within the (mock) jury room

    Legal Studies

    Volume 35, Issue 2, June 2015, Pages: 201–225, Louise Ellison and Vanessa E Munro

    Version of Record online : 28 APR 2014, DOI: 10.1111/lest.12051

  6. Social Psychology and Law

    Chapter

    Handbook of Social Psychology

    Margaret Bull Kovera and Eugene Borgida

    Published Online : 30 JUN 2010, DOI: 10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy002035

  7. Jury decision making research: Are researchers focusing on the mouse and not the elephant in the room?

    Behavioral Sciences & the Law

    Volume 29, Issue 3, May/June 2011, Pages: 439–451, Narina Nuñez, Sean M. McCrea and Scott E. Culhane

    Version of Record online : 23 FEB 2011, DOI: 10.1002/bsl.967

  8. The Effect of Blinded Experts on Juror Verdicts

    Journal of Empirical Legal Studies

    Volume 9, Issue 4, December 2012, Pages: 765–794, Christopher T. Robertson and David V. Yokum

    Version of Record online : 6 NOV 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2012.01273.x

  9. Emotion, Authority, and Death: (Raced) Negotiations in Mock Capital Jury Deliberations

    Law & Social Inquiry

    Volume 40, Issue 2, Spring 2015, Pages: 377–405, Mona Lynch and Craig Haney

    Version of Record online : 11 DEC 2014, DOI: 10.1111/lsi.12099

  10. Juror Perceptions of the Legitimacy of Legal Authorities and Decision Making in Criminal Cases

    Law & Social Inquiry

    Volume 38, Issue 4, Fall 2013, Pages: 773–802, Amy Farrell, Liana Pennington and Shea Cronin

    Version of Record online : 7 SEP 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-4469.2012.01323.x

  11. Information Integration Theory, Juror Bias, and Sentence Recommendations Captured Over Time in a Capital Trial

    Applied Cognitive Psychology

    Volume 29, Issue 5, September/October 2015, Pages: 713–722, Victoria C. Estrada-Reynolds, Jennifer M. Gray and Narina Nuñez

    Version of Record online : 24 JUL 2015, DOI: 10.1002/acp.3155

  12. Jury decision-making biases and methods to counter them

    Legal and Criminological Psychology

    Volume 15, Issue 1, February 2010, Pages: 133–154, Tarika Daftary-Kapur, Rafaele Dumas and Professor Steven D. Penrod

    Version of Record online : 10 JAN 2011, DOI: 10.1348/135532509X465624

  13. The Impact of Case Characteristics and Prior Jury Experience on Jury Verdicts

    Journal of Applied Social Psychology

    Volume 15, Issue 7, November 1985, Pages: 409–427, Carol M. Werner, Michael J. Strube, Allen M. Cole and Dorothy K. Kagehiro

    Version of Record online : 31 JUL 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1985.tb02262.x

  14. Constructing insanity: jurors' prototypes, attitudes, and legal decision-making

    Behavioral Sciences & the Law

    Volume 25, Issue 4, July/August 2007, Pages: 449–470, Jennifer Eno Louden and Jennifer L Skeem

    Version of Record online : 15 MAY 2007, DOI: 10.1002/bsl.760

  15. Representation through Participation: A Multilevel Analysis of Jury Deliberations

    Law & Society Review

    Volume 45, Issue 3, September 2011, Pages: 667–698, Erin York Cornwell and Valerie P. Hans

    Version of Record online : 19 SEP 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5893.2011.00447.x

  16. Voir Dire and Jury Selection

    Chapter

    Handbook of Psychology, Second Edition

    Margaret Bull Kovera

    Published Online : 26 SEP 2012, DOI: 10.1002/9781118133880.hop211026

  17. Disjunction Between Probability and Verdict in Juror Decision Making

    Journal of Behavioral Decision Making

    Volume 25, Issue 3, July 2012, Pages: 276–294, Hal R. Arkes, Brittany Shoots-Reinhard and Ryan S. Mayes

    Version of Record online : 1 MAR 2011, DOI: 10.1002/bdm.734

  18. “Recipe for a Jury” Revisited: A Balance Theory Prediction

    Journal of Applied Social Psychology

    Volume 9, Issue 4, August 1979, Pages: 335–349, Stuart Fischoff

    Version of Record online : 31 JUL 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1979.tb00808.x

  19. Criminal Case Complexity: An Empirical Perspective

    Journal of Empirical Legal Studies

    Volume 1, Issue 2, July 2004, Pages: 331–369, Michael Heise

    Version of Record online : 14 JUN 2004, DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2004.00010.x

  20. Jurors’Evaluations of Expert Testimony: Judging the Messenger and the Message

    Law & Social Inquiry

    Volume 28, Issue 2, April 2003, Pages: 441–482, Sanja Kutnjak Ivković and Valerie P. Hans

    Version of Record online : 28 JUL 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-4469.2003.tb00198.x