Search Results

There are 7860955 results for: content related to: Patch tests in children: a review of 14 years experience

  1. Contact dermatitis from jojoba oil and myristyl lactate/maleated soybean oil

    Contact Dermatitis

    Volume 34, Issue 1, January 1996, Pages: 71–72, F. Wantke, W. Hemmer, M. Gorz and R. Jarisch

    Version of Record online : 11 APR 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1996.tb02126.x

  2. Contact Dermatitis: Allergic

    Rook's Textbook of Dermatology, Seventh Edition

    M. H. Beck, S. M. Wilkinson, Pages: 817–940, 2008

    Published Online : 4 FEB 2008, DOI: 10.1002/9780470750520.ch20

  3. Maleated soybean oil, a new cosmetic allergen

    Contact Dermatitis

    Volume 32, Issue 1, January 1995, Pages: 49–51, A. Dooms-Goossens, L. Buyse and H. Stals

    Version of Record online : 11 APR 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1995.tb00845.x

  4. Patch testing in children

    Contact Dermatitis

    Volume 34, Issue 5, May 1996, Pages: 341–344, G. I. Stables, A. Forsyth and R. S. Lever

    Version of Record online : 11 APR 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1996.tb02219.x

  5. Poster

    Contact Dermatitis

    Volume 70, Issue s1, June 2014, Pages: 73–120,

    Version of Record online : 25 JUN 2014, DOI: 10.1111/cod.12263

  6. You have free access to this content
    Adverse reactions to fragrances

    Contact Dermatitis

    Volume 36, Issue 2, February 1997, Pages: 57–86, Anton C. de Groot and Peter J. Frosch

    Version of Record online : 11 APR 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1997.tb00418.x

  7. Simultaneous occurrence of immediate and delayed allergy as a cause of contact dermatitis

    Contact Dermatitis

    Volume 3, Issue 1, February 1977, Pages: 27–36, Gösta Krook

    Version of Record online : 11 APR 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1977.tb03583.x

  8. Allergic contact dermatitis from natural latex without contact urticaria

    Contact Dermatitis

    Volume 28, Issue 3, March 1993, Pages: 154–156, M. Wyss, P. Elsner, B. Wüthrich and G. Burg

    Version of Record online : 11 APR 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1993.tb03377.x

  9. Contact dermatitis caused by allergy to ophthalmic drugs and contact lens solutions

    Contact Dermatitis

    Volume 25, Issue 5, November 1991, Pages: 305–312, Rudole A. Herbst and Howard I. Maibagh

    Version of Record online : 11 APR 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1991.tb01879.x

  10. Allergic contact dermatitis from 1,6-diisocyanatohexane in an anti-pill finish

    Contact Dermatitis

    Volume 25, Issue 2, August 1991, Pages: 94–96, S. M. Wilkinson, P H. Cartwright, J. Armitage and J. S. C. English

    Version of Record online : 11 APR 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1991.tb01795.x

  11. Occupational dermatitis in shoemakers

    Contact Dermatitis

    Volume 34, Issue 1, January 1996, Pages: 17–22, G. Mancuso, M. Reggiani and R. M. Berdondini

    Version of Record online : 11 APR 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1996.tb02105.x

  12. Case Reports

    Contact Dermatitis

    Volume 70, Issue s1, June 2014, Pages: 41–51,

    Version of Record online : 25 JUN 2014, DOI: 10.1111/cod.12261

  13. Possible cosmetic dermatitis due to mercaptobenzothiazole

    Contact Dermatitis

    Volume 34, Issue 1, January 1996, Page: 72, H. I. Maibach

    Version of Record online : 11 APR 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1996.tb02127.x

  14. Anaphylactic shock from chlorobutanol-preserved oxytocin

    Contact Dermatitis

    Volume 15, Issue 4, September 1986, Page: 241, H. Hofmann, G. Goerz and G. Plewig

    Version of Record online : 11 APR 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1986.tb01344.x

  15. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from amethocaine

    Contact Dermatitis

    Volume 19, Issue 1, July 1988, Pages: 69–70, L. Condé-Salazar, M. G. Llinás, D. Guimaraens and L. Romero

    Version of Record online : 11 APR 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1988.tb02879.x

  16. Allergic contact dermatitis from para-tertiary-butylphenol-formaldehyde resin (PTBP-F-R) in Northern Ireland

    Contact Dermatitis

    Volume 29, Issue 3, September 1993, Pages: 144–146, J. Handley, D. Todd, A. Bingham, R. Corbett and D. Burrows

    Version of Record online : 11 APR 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1993.tb03512.x

  17. Double-blind placebo-controlled peroral challenges in patients with delayed-type allergy to balsam of Peru

    Contact Dermatitis

    Volume 33, Issue 2, August 1995, Pages: 78–83, Aila Niinimäki

    Version of Record online : 11 APR 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1995.tb00505.x

  18. Posters Basic and Clinical Research

    Contact Dermatitis

    Volume 58, Issue s1, May 2008, Pages: 47–80,

    Version of Record online : 27 MAY 2008, DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2008.01383.x

  19. Pre-treatment of nickel test areas with sodium lauryl sulfate detects nickel sensitivity in subjects reacting negatively to routinely performed patch tests

    Contact Dermatitis

    Volume 34, Issue 2, February 1996, Pages: 88–92, Stefania Seidenari, Alberico Motolese and Barbara Belletti

    Version of Record online : 11 APR 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1996.tb02136.x

  20. Results of patch testing in children

    Contact Dermatitis

    Volume 27, Issue 5, May 1992, Pages: 326–328, M. Pambor, G. Krüger and S. Winkler

    Version of Record online : 11 APR 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1992.tb03292.x